| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 14, 09, 12:37PM
| #1 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Today the website of SuperiorPapers.com was modified. What was deleted/altered?
Logos or trademarks (previously) appearing on the extreme lower/bottom right of the website belonging to 6 companies/entities--All with the heading "As Seen On." This was placed under "We can do it . . .Need your paper tomorrow." You replaced the "As Seen On" and the logos with the credit cards and authorize.net recently.
You did remove the logos based on the demands of the respective companies. You may also desire to block the way back machine with a bot BUT you see, we have ALL the evidence already. So please stop trying to fool us.
Changing address posted at websites, deleting logos of companies . . .what is happening with you people? You used to display 'infallibility' to a point that we thought you are above the law.
WB, time to be vigilant.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Jan 14, 09, 01:01PM
| #2 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
The Mizyuk crooks at EssayWriters.net are beginning to realize that we don't have to go after them in Ukraine. American authorities will do perfectly fine. Link providers and search engines should be our focus.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 14, 09, 01:16PM
| #3 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
WritersBeware: Link providers and search engines should be our focus.
agree :)
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 17, 09, 01:27PM
| #4 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Hey everyone, please hurry be a witness before this disappears:
lower/bottom extreme right.
http://209.85.175.132/search?q=cache:YkADyg688cgJ:www.superiorpapers.com/+a s+seen+on+by+superiorpapers.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1
http://209.85.175.132/search?q=cache:sO7iU1r91WAJ:www.superiorpapers.com/cu stomersupport.php+as+seen+on+by+superiorpapers.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2
It used to be 6 companies but one made a demand to 'take down' so SuperiorPapers took it down. Then the rest followed suit, so now it did not have a choice except to take it all down.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Jan 17, 09, 01:45PM
| #5 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
Scumbags!
Archives saved.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 17, 09, 10:21PM
| #6 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Mod, why was my earlier post immediately after the post of 'trymedave' deleted.
My post in substance:
1. I replied to WB and thanked her for saving the archives.
2. Reply to 'trymedave's' post of accusing WB to be working for a fraudulent company: if true, he should secure evidence to show the alleged fraud and gather all the persons allegedly defrauded and ask them to complain.
I am aware of one of the policies:
"9. Any post may be removed or edited without warning by forum moderators or administrators."
May I know why my post was deleted together with 'trymedave'?
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Jan 17, 09, 10:29PM
| #7 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
Since the original post was deleted, your responses became unnecessary, especially since they now lacked any context or relation to previous posts. All such posts are completely unrelated to the thread's topic, anyway. Why would you re-hash false accusations? You've now replaced the same nonsense, which completely defeats the purpose of the mod's deletions.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 17, 09, 10:52PM
| #8 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
WritersBeware: Since the original post was deleted, your responses became unnecessary, especially since they now lacked any context or relation to previous posts. All such posts are completely unrelated to the thread's topic, anyway. Why would you re-hash false accusations? You've now replaced the same nonsense, which completely defeats the purpose of the mod's deletions.
I welcome your contention. Does the Moderator share the same opinion? Please note that my post was not ENTIRELY referring to trymedave's post. Part of it was a reply to your post.
I would disagree with you on your claim that I "replaced the same nonsense," I merely made a description of fact. By 'replacing the same nonsense' would mean accusing you the same way as 'trymedave' did which I HAD NO intention of doing. Thus, from the points of view of nature and purpose, my post was different from what you claim as nonsensical post of trymedave.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Jan 17, 09, 11:14PM
| #9 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
My contention is that there is no reason to put his blatant lies back in the public eye. Plus, I am making no "claim" that it is nonsense. I am stating fact. It's pure nonsense. By rehashing it, all you're doing is validating his defamatory accusations. If he had any proof whatsoever, you don't think he would have posted it already, especially since I challenged the moron to do so 100 times? You don't think that any of the DOZENS of frauds before him would have posted evidence if it existed? Their false accusations are the result of frustrated desperation.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 12:35AM
| #10 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
WritersBeware: My contention is that there is no reason to put his blatant lies back in the public eye.
I respect your opinion. I think we both are broad-minded people to recognise that difference of opinions exists in a civilised society. And as I have explained--it was merely a description of fact, thus different in nature and purpose.
WritersBeware: By rehashing it, all you're doing is validating his defamatory accusations.
Like I said, I was NOT rehashing. It was merely a description of fact. When one describes the contents and recounts the incidents from the point of personal knowledge of its existence, it is NOT TANTAMOUNT to validating the contents. The existence of incidents/events and the existence of the contents are not equivalent to proving the contents as TRUE. Validating is giving legitimacy to a statement and this can only be POSSIBLE with credible corroborating evidence. This was the reason why I asked 'trymedave' poster to prove his statement.
WritersBeware: If he had any proof whatsoever, you don't think he would have posted it already, especially since I challenged the moron to do so 100 times? You don't think that any of the DOZENS of frauds before him would have posted evidence if it existed? Their false accusations are the result of frustrated desperation.
I do not want to speculate. Proof can be presented here at the forum like what you and others have been doing here or it may be presented in court or by employing other means in other venues. Thus, since trymedave made his statement here, it would be wise for him to post his personal proof. But that is of course left to his sound discretion. I just want to maintain my independence of thought and what I should believe in guided by the precepts I have learned in life.
The way I see it, he was promoting his own services and you were preventing that. In good faith, you wanted the poster to abide by the rules. Compliance to the forum rules is largely (not solely) within the interest of the Mod and the forum-"6. The EssayScam Forum is not a place for advertisements or publicity in any way. EssayScam and its moderators have the sole discretion to determine what constitutes an advertisement."
Besides WB, the forum itself prescribes as one of its policies stated in its 'Disclaimer and Privacy Policy,' " We believe all information at EssayScam.org has been gathered to the best of the ability and knowledge of the authors. However, EssayScam.org cannot and will not guarantee the correctness, completeness, truthfulness, or helpfulness of any message or complaint posted at this website. We encourage you to use your own judgment and do your own research to decide whether or not the provided information is true and unbiased."
Information is very broad as to include any statement of fact made by a poster which is not necessarily limited to evidence alone. Now, how credible the evidence is, is something that will be passed upon by the courts and administrative agencies and not by public opinion.
Have more confidence in TRUTH. After all, what makes a person is NOT what a few others declare him to be. Have faith in your track record.
|
|
| trymedave |
|
Jan 18, 09, 02:36AM
| #11 |
Joined: Dec 25, 08
Posts: 88
|
WritersBeware: Their false accusations are the result of frustrated desperation.
All of us are well aware of who is frustrated and cranky
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Jan 18, 09, 02:43AM
| #12 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
Great--return of the moron.
Most of your recent posts have been rightfully deleted. Keep it up and I'm sure you'll be gone permanently.
|
|
| trymedave |
|
Jan 18, 09, 04:11AM
| #13 |
Joined: Dec 25, 08
Posts: 88
|
WritersBeware: Most of your recent posts have been rightfully deleted
Most of your posts were deleted too you scumbag.......
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 18, 09, 04:40AM
| #14 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
trymedave, please just let WB be. If you want to promote your services then do as you please. But should the Mod. decide to ban you, I am sure you would have to face such consequence. It is only a suggestion.
I am sure that more people would appreciate your efforts if you use more of it in giving information so that others can avoid being victimised. Besides, do you not think that people who may need your services would be hesitant after reading a few of your posts?
There is no contest or competition in exposing scams or in relating how one was duped. Any information, no matter how insignificant it may appear is as VITAL as those that appear to be a result of an exhaustive investigation. They all link together.
One posts information for the public--not to prove or out prove anyone here. Allow the public (members or readers) to decide how they would take stock of the information.
|
|
| trymedave |
|
Jan 18, 09, 04:54AM
| #15 |
Joined: Dec 25, 08
Posts: 88
|
voir_dire: do you not think that people who may need your services would be hesitant after reading a few of your posts?
I don't think so because scumbags like WB aren't trusted by the other people who frequently visit this website. All of us are familiar with the way she behaves with everyone and I have better work to do than to talk about that scumbag all day long......
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 05:11AM
| #16 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Well, I think you know that we cannot change specific behavior or traits which we dislike in a person. So it is futile trying to do that. You would only drag yourself down. I can sense that you are an educated person.
I am certain that each and everyone has drawn their respective conclusions about all or most of the members here. Truth will always come out--albeit it may take some time in certain instances but it will always prevail.
So, have a better day than yesterday :)
|
|
| trymedave |
|
Jan 18, 09, 05:20AM
| #17 |
Joined: Dec 25, 08
Posts: 88
|
voir_dire: So, have a better day than yesterday :)
Sure, you too
|
|
| akuma |
|
Jan 18, 09, 06:34AM
| #18 |
Joined: Dec 1, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 66
|
voir_dire: I can sense that you are an educated person.
how did you come to this illogical conclusion? Trymedave is of no use on this site, he's nothing more than a scam artist who contributes zilch other than forwarding his own agenda against WB and should be rightfully banned.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 18, 09, 07:11AM
| #19 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
voir_dire: Allow the public (members or readers) to decide how they would take stock of the information.
Maybe you should take a leaf out of your own book after your attack on me when I tried warning people on here of the pitfalls involved in legal action, from which you concluded I had a hidden agenda.
voir_dire: Truth will always come out
If that is true then eventually everyone will realise that allegations you made against me were untrue, for example
1. you alleged i was male
2. you alleged i was not a barrister
3. you alleged that i was not a writer
4. you alleged i was several people posting under 1 name
5. you alleged i was working for one of the scam companies.
All of the above are false- so who will look a fool when the TRUTH does come out lol
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 18, 09, 08:05AM
| #20 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
'Stealing the show and limelight' as usual. I really feel sorry that you feel threatened again!
exwriter: Maybe you should take a leaf out of your own book after your attack on me when I tried warning people on here of the pitfalls involved in legal action, from which you concluded I had a hidden agenda.
I do not have to do that because the public knows how to read. My attack on you? Again, the posts are self explanatory unless of course, you attach a different meaning to words which are found in your own version of dictionary.
That is self serving for you. I have explained thoroughly the reasons. Now, with all of that you still cannot comprehend the self explanatory posts notwithstanding the fact that the entire world understood. Then it is your PROBLEM--perhaps, you should spend more of your £ on educating yourself.
NOW STOP addressing me. YOU are a dreadful, disgusting piece of existence who makes use of this FORUM to make yourself feel SOMEBODY. You strive woefully to 'compete' and make yourself the 'star' to uplift your low self-esteem at the expense of others. Find yourself a lackey to use for your GRANDSTANDING.
Obviously today, you are in dire frantic need to display your legal expertise (sic), your ethics (sic), the amount of money you spent on your career (sic), the pathetic need to bully and put pressure on people you are in personal dispute by using your claim to be a 'barrister.' Go ahead and make this forum YOUR SHOWCASE.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 08:22AM
| #21 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
akuma: how did you come to this illogical conclusion?
My statement is clear. I quote myself: voir_dire: I can sense that you are an educated person.
Logic proceeds from a different faculty, that is different from where 'sense' proceeds from.
akuma: should be rightfully banned.
Perhaps, you should take it up with the Moderator.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 18, 09, 09:45AM
| #22 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
Oh how easy it is to wind you up LOL my work here is complete!!
|
|
| trymedave |
|
Jan 18, 09, 09:49AM
| #23 |
Joined: Dec 25, 08
Posts: 88
|
akuma: how did you come to this illogical conclusion? Trymedave is of no use on this site
Oh really, Are you making a difference here?????
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 10:12AM
| #24 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
exwriter: my work here is complete
I am SURE you got paid! I hope the amount is a little higher than 'peanuts' which you were so used to receiving from those you worked for before the imposition of fines. I was merely making you earn HERE.
exwriter: easy it is to wind you up
Stop your delusions of grandeur--you? why you can't even spell correctly but have loads of nerves to even correct me. An alleged 'barrister' who does not even know the basic difference between jurisprudence and jurisdiction.
Now that you have earned a bit more because of your WORK HERE--try educating yourself.
You have long destroyed yourself already.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 18, 09, 12:03PM
| #25 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
voir_dire: I am SURE you got paid! I hope the amount is a little higher than 'peanuts' which you were so used to receiving from those you worked for before the imposition of fines. I was merely making you earn HERE.
Oh i don't get paid for winding you up! that i do for fun lol!
In fact the only work I do get paid for is presenting in court, prosecuting low life individuals who break the law, speaking of which off to do some case prep, got a 5 day case starting tomorrow, unless I persuade him to plead guilty seeing the evidence stacked against him.
Least I work for the good guys, would hate defending some of the scum I see on a daily basis.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 12:37PM
| #26 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
exwriter: i don't get paid
poor you! for just a few hundreds of £ not paid, you scream your tonsils out. you must do poorly on your work that you have to write for students.
I am not surprised, the species you belong to are known for a very shallow gratification level--no comprehension and no reading and spelling skills.
exwriter: In fact the only work I do get paid for is presenting in court, prosecuting low life individuals who break the law, speaking of which off to do some case prep, got a 5 day case starting tomorrow, unless I persuade him to plead guilty seeing the evidence stacked against him. Least I work for the good guys, would hate defending some of the scum I see on a daily basis.
Volunteering self serving information--no one asked you. But go ahead with your grandstanding. The companies you worked for did not even value your writing services and they all treated you like dung. So the forum is your bastion to make up for what is lacking in your low self-esteem. Pathetic bully.
With your ethics, the good guys are in trouble. you only bring disrepute and disgrace to the legal profession.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Jan 18, 09, 01:29PM
| #27 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
trymedave: I don't think so because scumbags like WB aren't trusted by the other people who frequently visit this website.
Really? Is that why I FREQUENTLY receive "thank you" notes via private message? Is that why DOZENS of members have also posted "thank you" messages in this forum? For every person who actually takes the time to contact me, there are probably THOUSANDS who see my messages and avoid being SCAMMED by idiots like you.
I'm not surprised that you would claim that I am a "scumbag." Crooks and criminals always create derogatory names for the people and organizations that bring them to justice and/or educate their would-be victims. You're no different. You're a louse.
Once again, I challenge you: show everyone just ONE general claim that I have posted on this board that is false.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Jan 18, 09, 01:33PM
| #28 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
akuma: how did you [voir_dire] come to [the] illogical conclusion [that trymedave is an intelligent person]? Trymedave is of no use on this site, he's nothing more than a scam artist who contributes zilch other than forwarding his own agenda against WB and should be rightfully banned.
Akuma, you beat me to it.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 18, 09, 01:46PM
| #29 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
voir_dire: poor you! for just a few hundreds of £ not paid, you scream your tonsils out. you must do poorly on your work that you have to write for students.
Oh i get paid well for my work in court, very well lol and as for students - I dont work as a writer now (hence the title ex writer) I jut tutor and proof read and edit work.
Actually I am very successful in what I do. I am after all a QC and very well respected by my colleagues. Please enlighten me as to when I have ever been a BULLY lol
If you were not sso hypersensitive you would not rise to the bait all the time lol
Lighten up life is too short to get your knickers in a twist over a forum chat! lol
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 18, 09, 02:13PM
| #30 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Does not make any difference--now or before.
exwriter: I jut tutor and proof read and edit work.
Students, you are in big trouble!
exwriter: Actually I am very successful in what I do. I am after all a QC and very well respected by my colleagues
Yeah, right. Self-serving--not credible at all. Yeah, successful--if you say so. People, be careful--you might step on the tonsils!
It will take decades for someone to do that to you.
Hypersensitive? You are the one who lacks refinement, breeding, manners, ethics and very crude.
Over compensating again--shallow gratification level. You are such a pathetic old fool who needs to grandstand all the time to make up for your low self-esteem. I am not surprised why the companies you have written for treated you like dung.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 18, 09, 02:33PM
| #31 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
Note no matter how much you insult I refuse to drop to your level of name calling, I guess that's down to self respect.
Anyway i'm bored with winding you up now, it was fun for a while, a bit like eating cold soup, but then it becomes tedious, so i'll bid you adieu until next time I feel like pulling your chain.
Oh and remember your own previous comment about people who like to have the last word ha ha!
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 18, 09, 03:12PM
| #32 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
You must be suffering from senility? Read your previous posts. After your insults and name calling, you have the audacity to even engage me in a conversation here. You must have a very thick face!
The only respect you know is for yourself. I do not even call it that but EGO. You are FULL of it.
exwriter: then it becomes tedious
Sure, you are having a hard time spelling, comprehending and reading! So let me give this back to you--Buffoon!
Next time, I hope you are censured already for dragging and bringing disrepute to the legal profession.
exwriter: Oh and remember your own previous comment about people who like to have the last word ha ha!
Senile, it was your comment. I merely gave it back to you. And since, it seemed not to have registered in your failing mind, you might as well shove it down your filthy throat!
You claim to be a barrister--for what? when after you have been allegedly duped of your earnings as a writer, you cannot even seek vindication of your own rights? So instead, you come to this forum and make your personal attacks, brandishing your qualifications, your being a barrister, the amount you spent on your career, the amount you are making, and how successful and respected you are (sic); questioning people you handpick of their qualifications and using your being a barrister to gain advantage and put pressure on them on matters you are in personal dispute.
And have you declared the income you earned as a writer? Do not respond anymore as I am sure it would be self-serving.
You shameless, stinking piece of dirt.
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 19, 09, 12:01AM
| #33 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Now, read again my post today at link: http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/12_825_2.html (This site is as fraudulent as the others!)
voir_dire: "exwriter:
that was your post moron not mine lol"You thick-faced imbecile! My post of January 12, 2009: voir_dire: a dose of your own medicine "http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/298096" contained a hyperlink of text 'a dose of your own medicine' AND it referred to LINK: http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/12_752_1.htmlwhere you addressed WB on Dec 3, 08, 11:44PM in YOUR POST: "exwriter:
Hey WB someone on another forum has asked a question about you lol x x x x x x xhttp://www.answerbag.com/q_view/298096"ENLIGHTEN your failing mind and shove this down in your filthy throat--it WAS YOUR POST! YOU humiliated YOURSELF. YOU made an Arse of YOURSELF so many many times here but you still have the temerity to call people morons, buffoons; correcting the manner of spelling words when they were spelled correctly, erroneously commenting on the usage between jurisprudence and jurisdiction--basic legal terminologies that even a law student knows! NOW, your [b]very OWN POST of a little over a month had completely evaporated from your thick skull![/b]EAT and CHOKE on YOUR VERY WORDS--you are the moron. Go back to your hole, arse!
You even dared to USE your being a 'barrister' to put pressure and gain advantage over those people you are in personal dispute when you are so deficient in BASIC HUMAN SKILLS. Did you declare the income you earned as a writer?! This was the SOLE REASON why you railroaded any move to mobilise other victimised writers to vindicate their own rights! You have something PERSONAL AT STAKE to protect.
You are a complete waste of anyone's time! You shameless NINCOMPOOP go back to your hellhole!
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Edited by: exwriter Jan 19, 09, 11:32PM
| #34 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
voir_dire: You have something PERSONAL AT STAKE to protect.
Like the writers from losing MORE money. Name 1 decided case against an essay writing company that has been won by a disgruntled writer - the absence of ANY high;ights the likelihood of success - oh and OF COURSE I declared my earnings from writing- least my accountant did- which amounts to the same thing. I don't need to hide from the taxman- in my job it would be porofessional suicide to try to hide extra income- I don't intend to gey myself debarred for a few measly pounds.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Jan 19, 09, 11:38PM
| #35 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,682
|
I'm just posting to get the "last word."
Thanks
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 20, 09, 01:00AM
| #36 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
It is a good thing that you edited your post. I read it before the modification where you raised the issue of my (low) comprehension skills referring to "a dose of your own medicine
"http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/298096" as something merely directed to me. This was the very reason why the subsequent post of WB contained a comment on having the "last word." Thus, I reproduce verbatim WB's comment as,
WritersBeware: I'm just posting to get the "last word." Thanks
You deleted that portion of your post because you knew how stupid you would appear-trying to find a small-hole-out for escape in an argument you have placed yourself in and which you have lost!
The small-hole-out was that you meant this-->"http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/298096" to simply to refer to me but as an afterthought, you remembered your previous post exwriter: exwriter:
that was your post moron not mine lol
on another thread http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/15_825_2.html. Your use of possessive pronoun 'your' would only contradict that portion of your post-so you edited. WE have ALL seen.
Be that as it may, your lack of comment on the subject matter of your comment "your post moron not mine lol" is PROOF that you MUNCHED AND CHOKED ON YOUR VERY OWN WORDS ALREADY.
exwriter: Name 1 decided case against an essay writing company that has been won by a disgruntled writer - the absence of ANY high;ights the likelihood of success
Do your assignment! There are cases! People who are not as ill-informed as you are, are laughing at your post. Your lack of information on the matter including the way you posted your first thread of http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/14_824_0.html of 'your-infamous-I-doubt-I-suspect-I-doubt" showcase are PROOF enough that you did not even LIFT A FINGER to find out BECAUSE YOU NEVER HAD ANY INTENTIONS OF VINDICATING YOUR RIGHTS WHICH YOU ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED by the essay writing website and you NEVER HAD ANY INTENTIONS OF HELPING OTHERS!
exwriter: OF COURSE I declared my earnings from writing- least my accountant did- which amounts to the same thing. I don't need to hide from the taxman- in my job it would be porofessional suicide to try to hide extra income- I don't intend to gey myself debarred
ALL ISSUES including your identification of yourself as a 'barrister' (and a QC)and how you allegedly used it in personal disputes here at this website/forum to gain advantage and put pressure on people have been brought and raised before the UK authorities. Evidence of posts have been submitted.
I have NO intentions of wasting my time on you anymore. You only have yourself to blame for destroying yourself and choking on your very own words
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 20, 09, 01:37PM
| #37 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
voir_dire: gain advantage and put pressure on people have been brought and raised before the UK authorities.
Ha ha ha ha ha Thanks for making me laugh! Do you really think anyone is interested in the ramblings of an idiot like you lol
Damn WB I was going to let you have the last word but this post is just so funny I had to respond lol
Does Voir really think I care who he has supposedly raised this with lol especially since I CAN prove everything I have stated about myself lol
Get a life voir! lol
Damn knew I should have bought some more fly spray when I went shopping lol
SWAT SWAT lol
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Jan 20, 09, 02:40PM
| #38 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Over compensating again. No one like you will be interested in what I have to say. You do not even know how to spell and comprehend.
Idiot? You were the one who choked on your words so many many times.
Prove everything? No need--all your admissions are here. How could you remember when comments you made in a little over a month you have forgotten, Senile.You are just a thick-faced, shameless nincompoop to notice. I have a life and definitely not like the miserable one you have. You lost your money, screamed out your tonsils and you were treated like dung--poor you lol! You deserved it!
The alleged 'barrister' is acting like a crazed wild boar. Truly, you have shown everyone how you dragged and disgraced the legal profession.
|
|
| exwriter |
|
Jan 20, 09, 03:47PM
| #39 |
Joined: Nov 5, 08
Threads: 4
Posts: 289
|
fly swat anyone? lol
You are truly boring lol!
|
|
| voir_dire |
|
Edited by: voir_dire Jan 20, 09, 04:27PM
| #40 |
Joined: Nov 26, 08
Threads: 2
Posts: 82
|
Your son must be ashamed of you. You are acting like a crazed sl*t in dire need of s*x. You must have finished cleaning the toilets, dung. Now, get lost you stink the forum with your ignorance and senility!
|
|
