Lawteacher.net - legit, feedback?

did u realize they are alllllll scams and fauds to her?

I follow the RULES

do not promote sites that I know to be legitimate. This forum exists to PROTECT people from FRAUDULENT sites, NOT to promote legitimate sites. Understand, Braniac?

did u ever protect suck a company ?? ;)

Lawteacher.net is owned by what is probably the most overpriced company on the Internet. Beware.

Please can I just ask, why should she beware of using an 'overpriced' company?

I think it's scaremongering, and is not entirely necessary.

I have no interest in defending AA's sites, but at the same time perhaps it's not lawteacher.net that's over-priced, but sites like essaywriters.net that are ridiculously under-priced?

as Yuri will inevitably discover, make their illegal activities eligible for some of the most harsh penalties at the Federal level.

foreign companies that would never be compelled to sell them out

I already owned you in that side debate. Would you like me to layeth the smacketh down upon you once again?

Oh, shut up. You didn't own anybody. I kicked your ass to kingdom come and pulled you back to do it again. :D

I can easily prove both of your absurd claims wrong simply by pointing to ET's advertised policy of deleting customers' order information after a short period. If a university were to "ask" for a customer's information, I am quite positive that ET or any other company would simply laugh at the request and not respond. Even if your IMAGINARY, WILL-NEVER-HAPPEN-IN-MILLION-YEARS action by "the American government" were to take place and "compel" ET to provide such information, the company could only "give up" what its systems have saved, which is basically nothing. Nice try, genius. YOU GET OWNED AGAIN—what's new?

I ask one more time—what's your obsession with ET? What, exactly, does YOUR Ukrainian employer's filthy fraud have to do with ET or any other legitimate company? Why do you keep dragging ET into every thread and trying to deflect focus away from your employer's multitude of scams, deception, and fraud?

I can easily prove both of your absurd claims wrong simply by pointing to ET's advertised policy of deleting customers' order information after a short period. If a university were to "ask" for a customer's information, I am quite positive that ET or any other company would simply laugh at the request and not respond. Even if your IMAGINARY, WILL-NEVER-HAPPEN-IN-MILLION-YEARS action by "the American government" were to take place and "compel" ET to provide such information, the company could only "give up" what its systems have saved, which is basically nothing. Nice try, genius. YOU GET OWNED AGAIN—what's new?

I ask one more time—what's your obsession with ET? What, exactly, does YOUR Ukrainian employer's filthy fraud have to do with ET or any other legitimate company? Why do you keep dragging ET into every thread and trying to deflect focus away from your employer's multitude of scams, deception, and fraud?

EW_moron, why don't you post a thread asking for people to vote on who dominates all of our debates? Got the balls?

ordering from us

EW_moron, why don't you post a thread asking for people to vote on who dominates all of our debates? Got the balls?

Here comes "the whitegrim and all the other posters who are with you don't count"

You brought it up because you know that it's relevant and true.

EW_writer's fraud- and crime-supporting allies:

chacha
Researcher
whitegrim
stu4

Hey, EW_writer, did I miss anyone?

how you treat posters in general on this message board

Care to tell us who categorically supported you in your own thread?

Following is a list of members who support, acknowledge, and confirm as valid both my legal statements and position on business ethics in the essay industry:

pheelyks
OR
FreelanceWriter
exwriter
boom

IMO, while people here may find your crap useful to them on one occasion or another, they would certainly not stand by you on how you treat posters in general on this message board. Hey, I actually have evidence to support this one, but I'd rather not show it. ~_^

Why not try to call them to support you on this very thread to see if any of them respond?

EW_writer, I receive an instant message every time the forum home page changes.

In fact, pheelyks, OR, and boom8088 have already clearly communicated support of my legal information and stance on business ethics.

Oh, EW_writer, I'm still waiting for you to post your list of supporters.

(Here comes "the whitegrim and all the other posters who are with you don't count" excuse followed up with the "only the votes of myself and all the posters who agree with me count" crap. Before you pull it off, mind saying how many people actually directly voted for you in your own thread? :p)

In fact, pheelyks, OR, and boom8088

Wow... someone's obsessed... or working

P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C

^_^

OR specifically voted that I and others like me are not criminals

What's truly pathetic is a grown man including childish faces and ridiculous symbols in practically every post.

OR, can you please explain to the buffoon—once and for all—the stark difference between "sentimental opinion" and "legal reality," and where you stand on each? Thank you.