FIND OUT ABOUT THESE ESSAY SCAMMERS!

Doh. Could it be WB that you are guilty of name dropping?

For anyone who is actually interested, you can click here to read the post to get a feel of the PRETEXT under which I made that "name-dropping" post. After having not provided any names initially, I was specifically asked to provide the names by another, long-time member, EW_writer. I was then careful not to SINGLE-OUT any particular company, as I named FIVE (5). It may also be useful to note that I made that post about 18 months ago (September 5, 07)! Things have changed around here since then, and I have adopted stricter policies that I think better serve the forum.

Bambi, anyone who KNOWINGLY violates forum guidelines has BAD intentions. There is no excuse. .

There is just always a good excuse for you to break the rules!

Show me the member who has been posting for longer than me

True or not (and I really don't care, because I'm not here to "friend" people in Facebook), it's not any business of yours.

Did I criticize you when you attacked FreelanceWriter without provocation?

What? I don't think that he was a writer for ANY company, let alone a legit company.

The guy deserved that and a lot more. If I recall correctly, most everyone (except the resident hecklers) was staunchly on my side. The guy was so bad that the mod eventually banned his entire account, which is EXTREMELY rare.

Where have I used "foul and abusive language, including profanity" anywhere in this thread? Can I trouble you for a quote (as if it matters)?

Stop with the bullsh*t.

I understand that you miserably lost the main argument

Has the RULE changed in those 18 months? No, it hasn't.

"both the tone of the forum and my posting practices have changed since then"

WritersBeware:
Show me the member who has been posting for longer than me

I'll name two: Stu4 and Major. I believe Pious and others as well, but those are enough.
Proof that you LIED.
Like you LIED about "that site" being my favorite.
We'll use this post to keep a running tally of your lies in this thread. That's 2 so far.

WritersBeware:
True or not (and I really don't care, because I'm not here to "friend" people in Facebook), it's not any business of yours.

You correct people when they break the rules all the time. How is that any business of yours? Stop breaking the rules.

WritersBeware:
Did I criticize you when you attacked FreelanceWriter without provocation?


I told FW to shut up WITH provocation. He was using the forum to advertise his services, like he had multiple times in the past. You tell people who use this forum to advertise to stop all the time, I was no different.

So, another LIE by you. We're up to what, 3 in this thread alone?

WritersBeware:
What? I don't think that he was a writer for ANY company, let alone a legit company.

Another LIE WB. I can post quotes of you talking about the company that FreelanceWriter works for. Want to see them?

That's lie number 4, ouch.

WritersBeware:
The guy deserved that and a lot more. If I recall correctly, most everyone (except the resident hecklers) was staunchly on my side. The guy was so bad that the mod eventually banned his entire account, which is EXTREMELY rare.


You've used animal names to attack more than one person on this forum. Monkey-related phrases are one of your favorite default insults.

We'll call that half a life b/c maybe you're just misremembering. Up to 4.5.

WritersBeware:
Where have I used "foul and abusive language, including profanity" anywhere in this thread? Can I trouble you for a quote (as if it matters)?


WritersBeware:
Stop with the bullsh*t.


WritersBeware:
I understand that you miserably lost the main argument

The main argument is that you're abrasive, loud, obnoxious, foul-tempered and crude. You could make the forum a better place by posting helpful information without consistently hurling insults. I won that argument long ago, you aren't even trying to argue it.

Total LIE count by WB this thread: 4.5.

I'll name two: Stu4 and Major. I believe Pious and others as well, but those are enough.
Proof that you LIED.

Like you LIED about "that site" being my favorite.

You correct people when they break the rules all the time. How is that any business of yours? Stop breaking the rules.

Another LIE WB. I can post quotes of you talking about the company that FreelanceWriter works for. Want to see them?

You've used animal names to attack more than one person on this forum. Monkey-related phrases are one of your favorite default insults.

The main argument is that you're abrasive, loud, obnoxious, foul-tempered and crude. You could make the forum a better place by posting helpful information without consistently hurling insults. I won that argument long ago, you aren't even trying to argue it.

I've been around for longer than that and I don't think it has.

Obviously, by "longest-standing" I mean the most contributions over a long period of time, which I went on to clarify but you conveniently failed to mention, of course.

Um, hello? The husband/fight thing was NOT with FreelanceWriter.

YOU were defending me!

Give me a break. This shows how clueless you are on the subject. Since then, many of the existing members have jointly agreed that name-dropping and self-promotion by freelance writers is not in the best interests of this forum. It was a PUBLIC DISCUSSION. Feel free to do some searching.

Again, you fail to mention that I was attacked first. Spinning is fun, isn't it?

You broke the rules then, like you are continuing to do now. Why doesn't that bother you? You point out all the time that people are breaking the rules but do so yourself with impunity: it's quintessential hypocrisy.

Yes, default to the personal attacks when you have nothing of substance to say.

Way to keep consistent WB.

Yes, coming from the person who just called me a liar about 50 times.

Again, you're desperate and boring.

Lavinia's argument = "You're a meanie."

Whhaaaaaaaaah!

You broke the rules then, like you are continuing to do now. Why doesn't that bother you? You point out all the time that people are breaking the rules but do so yourself with impunity: it's quintessential hypocrisy.

Tell me—are you still denying that you LIED first and tried to smear my character? I'd be happy to post the IRREFUTABLE PROOF for everyone again.

Folks can read the first post, the conclusion and the bolded argument , and the thread to see that I'm right and that you are obfuscating.

I won't hold my breath waiting for an apology for your calling me a liar. I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt but it was obviously wasted.

Tell me—are you still denying that you LIED first and tried to smear my character? I'd be happy to post the IRREFUTABLE PROOF for everyone again.

You claimed that I NEVER stated that my thread was in reference to Ukrainian and Pakistani sites.

Dear WB,

Thank you so much for pointing out that the thread still exists so I have evidence.

For anyone who cares to read it, the thread is here:
http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/9_747_0.html

Your argument (which you were so kind to bold) was this:

WritersBeware:
Legitimate companies in the United States provide 300+ words per page, written by QUALIFIED writers like me, which is a much better value.


As the statement above proves, you did not leave ANY room for the existence of legit companies that provide less than 300 words a page, which was MY ARGUMENT.

And then you concluded with:


WritersBeware:
CONCLUSION:

1. Avoid sites that provide only 225-275 words per page.

2. Avoid sites that charge less than $17 per page for delivery in 1 week. ]


Your conclusion, again, said nothing about the argument being specific to foreign ripoffs. You made a blanket statement to avoid any sites that only provide 225-275 words. The problem with your argument is that there are legit companies who do provide less then 300 words a page, proving that your guideline was clearly flawed.

Therefore, I was correct when I wrote this:

Lavinia:
I'll refresh your memory: In your first post, you did NOT specify that your argument was specific to frauds from the Ukraine and Pakistan.


Folks can read the first post, the conclusion and the bolded argument , and the thread to see that I'm right and that you are obfuscating.

I am the longest-standing member.

I said that you didn't limit your argument to those foreign sites.

I'd like to call attention to Stu4's join date: March 13, 2006. Note that Stu4 joined the forum before WB, making this claim a lie:

I am the longest-standing member.

1. To slander and discredit the competition of his own website (check point #13 of the disclaimer to get the idea).

2. Not to allow to mention any other website in a positive light, even if posted by a genuine customer or customer service person because by any chance his website (which - I don't know why - still has a strong market position) could lose a client.

3. To bully other legitimate posters into believing he always knows best (which in some aspect might be the case IF he didn't have a financial reason to post here, but that's obviously not the case).

Get help. There have been great strides in the development of medications for whatever pervasive developmental disorder you have.

Secondly, I neither own nor promote any site. Do you have even the slightest evidence to show that I own ANYTHING? No. You lose.

Lavinia, are you there? Are these false accusations acceptable to you? Are you going to stand by and let him trash me with false accusations, or are you going to defend me as I did for you the other day when someone accused you of working for "foreign scam sites"?

I hope everyone takes notice of exactly which hypocritical member is engaging in "rude," "insulting" behavior.

Secondly, I neither own nor promote any site. Do you have even the slightest evidence to show that I own ANYTHING? No. You lose.

Take your meds.

I know what it means. I also know that you wrote the sentence as a condescending command, written with all your authority as the not quite "longest-standing" member of the forum.

You can keep engaging in this childishness for as long as you like.

In the meantime, I'll continue to work on my latest investigation that will contribute actual value to the forum, something for which you have applauded me in the past.

REALLY SAD! esp. the racist comments...

to the mod: is there a 'required' number of post so that one can be a premium member or something? seems like there are people who just post for the sake of posting with no regard to the consequences of their actions/opinions.

I was hoping to get some information that can help me in my pursuit of a telecommuting job but what ever data I gather from here is so minute compared to the amount of wrangling and power struggle happening between a very few number of people...

I thought i finally found what i want... but it's proving to be
a waste of my time... SAD.

do all posts here end up in bickering and petty squabbling? i was hoping this site will be a venue for freelance, online writers to share and exchange views. SAD.

Opinions are like as*holes—everybody's got one and they all stink.

Feel free to leave if you do not appreciate the help that I and others have posted in this forum.

I'm reading around here, and can't help but notice that WriterBeware is remarkably rude. On many occasions. Does anybody know why is that? Is it tolerable in this forum?

Seems to me rudeness is your second nature.
Isn't it rules braking on it's own? Is insult a part of your consumers protection strategy?
I read your posts, because they seem to be everywhere.