| rat289 |
|
Apr 13, 07, 11:35PM
| #361 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
One last thing I forgot to put in the above post... I didn't see it on my clipboard when I was proofing.
On a different thread an ESL writer asked this question:
Quoting: Zahar, Post #1 Is it possible to make $1000 or more a month as an ESL writer? I've been learning English for 10+ years and I think I'm not worse than most American "native" writers. But I live in Philippines - does it automatically disqualify me from getting an academic freelance writing position in a good American company? Thanks, Zahar
Post #2 answered his question and was completely on topic.
This was Amy's answer to his question:
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #3 My advice is to never work for a company that tells potential customers that your skill level in English language writing is higher than what is really is. In doing so, they are paying you FAR LESS than what a person with those true skills should earn, and they are deceiving customers at the same time.
This is the same theme over and over again from her. With every question put on the forum she makes sure she posts something to that effect. How can she say she has no agenda? I'm sure she'll be able to twist it into relevance
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 13, 07, 11:38PM
| #362 |
|
Rat, OPEN YOUR EYES. Can you not see that he TYPED "rat," not "Amy"? Wow--you make your living as a WRITER?
Rat, how much is EssayWriters.net paying you to be their "typing head"?
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 13, 07, 11:41PM
| #363 |
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #362 My advice is to never work for a company that tells potential customers that your skill level in English language writing is higher than what is really is. In doing so, they are paying you FAR LESS than what a person with those true skills should earn, and they are deceiving customers at the same time.
Rat, are you claiming that I am WRONG? Yes, I'm sure you will, seeing as though disagreeing with me helps your partners at EssayWriting.net.
Again, how much is EssayWriters.net paying you to be their "typing head"? I'm not the only one wondering.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 13, 07, 11:55PM
| #364 |
|
"EssayWriters.net holds a five-year experience in operating in the research industry and is entitled to produce genuine and exclusive pieces of writing and content."
http://www.thejobspider.com/job/view-job-1946503.html
LOL! What?
That is a quote from "Paul Jones," one of many "apple pie" Americans with perfect writing skills who work for EssayWriters.net.
Oh, almost forgot:
"Whether with experience or with burning desire to improve writing skills and find the ways to achieve your goals, EssayWriters.net will gladly welcome writers, journalists, content writers, and college students possessing research and writing skills on our impressively large and friendly team."
Hmmm, this doesn't seem to jive with the "Master or PhD only" promises to CUSTOMERS on the BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com Web sites.
Of course, rat would have everyone believe that this isn't consumer fraud.
|
|
| gibreel |
|
Edited by: gibreel Apr 14, 07, 12:00AM
| #365 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Posts: 9
|
3 posts since Rat and I asked for your story and there's STILL no response.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 12:10AM
| #366 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
<div class="quoting">Quoting: Amy1978, Post #362 Rat, OPEN YOUR EYES. Can you not see that he TYPED "rat," not "Amy"? Wow--you make your living as a WRITER?
Rat, how much is EssayWriters.net paying you to be their "typing head"?</div>
Ok, let's try this again. Please use your eyes and engage your brain as I explain this quote to you again...
<div class="quoting">Quoting: paperchasefraud, Post #348 I agree with you Rat, it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC but surely there are other documentary evidence egalzoom.com/LLC/Virginia-LLC-Formation.html These filings/documents once approved by the State would enjoy the presumption of regularity. Such legal presumption CANNOT be overthrown by self-serving, unsubstantiated personal assertions.</div>
The part he is agreeing with me on is with my fight agianst your assault against a company without any substantial evidence.
"Such legal presumption CANNOT be overthrown by self-serving, unsubstantiated personal assertions." Hasn't that been my position all along? It for sure hasn't been yours, it still isn't yours.
Again you're only seeing what you want and trying to pass off made up evidence agian. YOU claim to be a writer. Is that not a paragraph? The last sentence of the paragraph is the conclusion; the first sentence his position...
I agree with you rat, Such legal presumption CANNOT be overthrown by self-serving, unsubstantiated personal assertions. which was the point of my argument. The rest of the paragraph was filler to qualify and emphasise the final sentence. Christ Amy, that's one of the first lessons we learn in grammar class.
"it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC" what's missing in this fragment is the tagline of "as Amy claims". However, the tagline isn't needed because of the placement of "may" and "but" in the sentence. If you're as skilled a writer as you claim to be you would've seen this. Perhaps some of this forums writers could verify this.
I find it funny that out of a 2000 (est.) word post that paticular thing was the only thing you can find to comment on.
As for your inflamitory comment that I am a paid rep of that company... find a way to send a private message on this forum or direct me to another forum and I will give you my contact information, real name and just for good messure my accountant's number so you can verify that no money I recieve comes from them or any other company they own or are involved with. I have no problem allowing you to troll around in my world to satisfy your doubt about my motive, do you have the ethics to come here and say you were wrong about my motives or will you just twist things around and begin slamming me as you are that company?
Consider your punk card pulled. If you fail to take up my offer then you have no place questioning my motives. And you know what else, screw proofing this post, you can deal with the typos and miscues of spelling!
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 12:36AM
| #367 |
|
He typed:
"I agree with you Rat, it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC [online]"
He SHOULD have typed:
"I agree with you Amy, it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC [online]"
I am the one who stated that is is EASY. You stated that it is IMPOSSIBLE.
You are wrong. I am right. End of story.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 12:40AM
| #368 |
|
I'm not surprisd that you COMPLETELY IGNORED post #364. Here it is again, in case you'd like to make more excuses for the crooks:
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #364 "EssayWriters.net holds a five-year experience in operating in the research industry and is entitled to produce genuine and exclusive pieces of writing and content." http://www.thejobspider.com/job/view-job-1946503.htmlLOL! What? That is a quote from "Paul Jones," one of many "apple pie" Americans with perfect writing skills who work for EssayWriters.net. Oh, almost forgot: "Whether with experience or with burning desire to improve writing skills and find the ways to achieve your goals, EssayWriters.net will gladly welcome writers, journalists, content writers, and college students possessing research and writing skills on our impressively large and friendly team." http://www.thejobspider.com/job/view-job-1946503.htmlHmmm, this doesn't seem to jive with the "Master or PhD only" promises to CUSTOMERS on the BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com Web sites. Of course, rat would have everyone believe that this isn't consumer fraud. |
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 12:43AM
| #369 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #367 He typed: "I agree with you Rat, it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC [online]" He SHOULD have typed: "I agree with you Amy, it may be easy to file for incorporation of an LLC [online]" I am the one who stated that is is EASY. You stated that it is IMPOSSIBLE. You are wrong. I am right. End of story.
Thank you for proving my point Amy. You're only paying attention to the words you feel will help you and ignoring the rest because they go against you. I suspect when he sees this he will set you straight. You go on trying to frame this very minor issue as a victory for you, it doesn't matter to me nor does it take away from the fact that your opinion of that company is just that... an opinion; not fact.
With that I am out of this discussion. I'm sure Amy will post some half-baked interpretation of my latest post and I just want to let all who are reading this, know that my lack of a reply isn't in any way, shape or form me conceding her point. It does mean that all that needs to be said on this topic has been said and I will not indulge her warped definition of evidence.
I'm sure by now most of you realize what she stands for and what lengths she'll go to just to pass her personal feelings off as fact. Reasoning with a person emotionally charged as Amy is pointless. She's only going to see what she wants and she will continue to ignore reason. She will continue to see only the few words she can twist in her favor and ignore the many words that go against her. She is neither fair or balanced in her opinions and as such nobody should give them any credence. I would suggest you approach any comment she makes on any topic as you would approach one made by a child.
I've seen this type of person before. Usually they turn out to be a kid trying to play in the adult world. I highly doubt she holds the job of editor as she claimed in a post. I'd even be willing to go as far to say she is more than likely a high school student playing around. It is the only thing that makes sense given her actions throughout this site. Only a kid or mentally ill person would conduct themselves in such a manner. Be sure to understand that I am not passing this off as fact, only my opinion.
I've thrown down the gauntlet. I have given her an invitation to check me out till her heart's content. She is free to review the small mountain of research I've done involving this argument and she is free to post her conclusions here minus my real name. The only condition I have is that she is honest and ethical in doing so, both traits I feel she doesn't possess due to her adolescent age.
|
|
| gibreel |
|
Apr 14, 07, 01:09AM
| #370 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Posts: 9
|
Quoting: rat289, Post #369 I've seen this type of person before. Usually they turn out to be a kid trying to play in the adult world. I highly doubt she holds the job of editor as she claimed in a post. I'd even be willing to go as far to say she is more than likely a high school student playing around.
I'm inclined to believe likewise. There are of course worse conclusions that may be drawn from her irrational fears and unfounded anger - some forms of psychosis for instance. But "adolescent" seems more likely.
I think from the most recent discussion it is very obvious that she lacks basic comprehension skills. She's skilled with words the manner of a plumber - knowing where all the stops and commas go, but without understanding.
I'm signing off here too.
Bye.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 01:14AM
| #371 |
|
Rat, you're just upset because you know, deep down in that black heart of yours, that I am a better writer. It must be difficult for you to know that you've been labeled "washed up."
I also see that you are a SNIVELLING COWARD, having TWICE ignored posts 364 and 368. I'm not shocked at all, considering the fact that you have NO DEFENSE for the proof of fraud contained therein.
By the way, that was a cool, calculated tactic in telling everyone that you are "done responding" so that you can conveniently avoid having to respond to posts 364 and 368.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 01:16AM
| #372 |
|
Gibreel, you're an incredible loser. Go write some more essays to help children cheat. Your parents must be proud.
LOL.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 01:19AM
| #373 |
|
Hmmm, I'm sure it's pure coincidence that both Rat and Gibreel signed up for this forum on April 12, immediately attacking me and defending EssayWriters.net.
|
|
| paperchasefraud |
|
Apr 14, 07, 04:37AM
| #374 |
Joined: Apr 6, 07
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
|
My last post to tie ends . . .
You are absolutely correct Rat in your analysis—that is exactly how I meant it.
Quoting: rat289, Post #366 The part he is agreeing with me on is with my fight agianst your assault against a company without any substantial evidence.
And additionally, there are substantial documentary requirements before an LLC application can be approved by the State—one of which are IRS forms properly filled out and submitted. And by the way, Rat to support your independent and objective assessment, the laws also allow foreign LLCs, too.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #373 Hmmm, I'm sure it's pure coincidence that both Rat and Gibreel signed up for this forum on April 12, immediately attacking me and defending EssayWriters.net
Quite speculative—mere conjectures! With you, your world seems to have been reduced to two factions only. BUT there is the wide-middle consisting of independent minded and objective people who are NOT content with 'tainted' information rammed down their throats by yourself and by others. Anyone who seems to oppose the faction you are affiliated to is subject to your baseless and unwarranted suspicions.
Why the hot-brand 'ESL'? More absurd is the label—'ESL with poor grammar skills'—why not a label UNQUALIFIED WRITERS? You see, US Supreme Court ruled that in order for a classification to be not violative of the equal protection clause, it must be reasonable and proper (McDONALD v. BOARD OF ELECTION, 394 U.S. 802 (1969) A classification was "suspect" if it was based on a group's race, ethnicity, or religion-essentially the "discrete and insular minorities"(United States v. Carolene Products Co.) http://www.supremecourthistory.org/05_learning/subs/05_e.html
Why the label of your so called 'foreign sites and foreign writers'? How does this look like with concepts of globalization and Foreign governments' bilateral agreements for outsourcing of labor. Who are you to dictate and interfere with the capitalist's prerogative to choose and select their personnel?
Rat, perhaps she is motivated by deep-seated anger and hate yet it is also possible that she is only working for whatever token is given to her to fight the 'cause' as dictated by others.
Verily, those who are fearful and have doubts, do your own investigation and research—for truth is right at the tip of your noses. The so called 'self-appointed watchdogs' need some watching to do too.
|
|
| pious |
|
Apr 14, 07, 12:29PM
| #375 |
Joined: Mar 10, 07
Posts: 73
|
Rat, you say you're not with Essaywriters. But why all the interest in defending the site's business interest, of all things? You even allowed yourself to be drawn into a nasty debate with Amy.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 02:22PM
| #376 |
|
paperchasefraud, are you actually telling me that you MEANT to type "Rat" instead of "Amy"? How is that possible, considering the fact that I--ME, MYSELF, PERSONALLY, AMY--am the one who stated that it is EASY TO OPEN AN LLC ONLINE? Rat is the one who stated that it is "impossible," which is an utter lie to which he FAILS to admit. So, how could you possibly have stated that you "agree with rat" that it is easy to open an LLC online when he stated the EXACT OPPOSITE, unless that was an error on your part? (If you meant something else, you should have italicized or bolded "you.")
By the way, are you also a coward? Why ignore posts 364 and 368? Where's your legal diatribe of non-applicable, legal jargon to defend their irrefutable fraud?
As I have stated 1,000,000 times previously, my position has NOTHING--now, open your eyes and READ--to do with prejudice, racism, or geography. If I were "racist," I'd admit such. An "ESL writer with poor grammar skills" is ANY person of ANY skin tone or ANY religion (from Pakistan, Germany, Spain, India, Ireland, Sweden, etc.) who uses flawed grammar, syntax, word use, spelling, punctuation, etc. when writing in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE. As a general rule, they tend to work for much lower wages than qualified, native English-speaking writers from America or Great Brtitain because it is more difficult for them to get work as a result of their flawed skills in English language writing. The fact that these less-than-qualified writers accept a FRACTION of the compensation that American or British professionals makes them very attractive to the foreign companies, like bestessays, whose owners are also ESL. Here's the key: do these "foreign sites" admit that they hire "ESL writers with poor grammar"? NO, they don't! In fact, they blatantly LIE to the American public that they hire "ONLY native English-speaking writers." WHY DO THEY LIE? They know perfectly well that average, American customers do not want to hire a researcher with WORSE writing skills than themselves! So, the crooks at EssayWriters.net hire STUDENTS and ANY ESL WRITER WITH A KEYBOARD, as long as he or she will work cheaply, and then EssayWriters.net turns around and lies to the public--on bestessays.com and superiorpapers.com--that ALL of their writers are "native English speakers with a Master or PhD degree."AGAIN, WHY DO THEY LIE? Lying enables BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com to charge a lower fee to clients than any of the legitimately-operating companies based on American or British soil. Do they care when customers complain about the terrible grammar in the final product? No.
paperchasefraud, can you please show me--IN ANY ONE OF MY HUNDREDS OF POSTS--where I have stated that globalization or outsourcing should stop?
I have clearly and consistently referred to "foreign sites." Why? All of the fraudulent sites in question just happen to be "foreign sites." Is that MY fault? Show me ONE American company in the industry that contains purposely deceptive statements in their copy, and I'll be HAPPY to tear them apart, too!
The simple fact is the owners of American companies know that they can't get away with such blatant misrepresentation, deception, bait-and-switch tactics, and false advertising because they live on American soil and are bound by American laws and possible penalties. The owners of the foreign companies in question--bestessays.com, superiorpapers.com, essayrelief.com, masterpapers.com, etc.--have no such boundaries or fears.
IS THIS EXPLANATION OF MY TERMINOLOGY CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU, paperchasefraud?
I'm sorry if people have interpreted my statements as prejudice. From this point forward, there should be no such misinterpretation.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 04:18PM
| #377 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #376 paperchasefraud, are you actually telling me that you MEANT to type "Rat" instead of "Amy"? How is that possible, considering the fact that I--ME, MYSELF, PERSONALLY, AMY--am the one who stated that it is EASY TO OPEN AN LLC ONLINE? Rat is the one who stated that it is "impossible," which is an utter lie to which he FAILS to admit. So, how could you possibly have stated that you "agree with rat" that it is easy to open an LLC online when he stated the EXACT OPPOSITE, unless that was an error on your part? By the way, are you also a coward? Why ignore posts 364 and 368? Where's your legal diatribe of non-applicable, legal jargon to defend their irrefutable fraud?
You are so stupid it isn't even funny. Keep splitting those hairs, somebody may think you're right sooner or later.
Quoting: pious, Post #375 Rat, you say you're not with Essaywriters. But why all the interest in defending the site's business interest, of all things? You even allowed yourself to be drawn into a nasty debate with Amy.
Pious, I get all bent out of shape whenever somebody is passing false information about anything, one or business. Writer's love to argue, just one of my personality traits as my jumping in posting this shows. And I agree with you; this was a nasty debate and I shouldn't have let myself to be drawn into it. When I saw the nasty way she talked to ESL writers I was angered; that sort of prejudice shouldn't be left unchecked. I have a question for you.
What is the difference anyway if I were associated with them? Have I not been truthful and accurate with my statements? Have I not corrected myself when they were wrong? If I were associated with them why did it take me so long to locate the LLC? Wouldn't I have been able just to make a call to ask my "boss" (Amy, the quotes around boss mean that I am speaking hypothetically and not literally; however, I'm sure you'll find a way to twist this into me admitting to being invested). More importantly, wouldn't I have access to records involving Amy and what they "did" to her and publish that information to show her true motives? Why would I limit my defense to just this company, why not the parent company and all the companies they own or manage? I mean there are so many holes in the entire argument that I have any involvement with this company. Don't be as blinded as Amy is to the truth; don't give in to her tactics of misdirection.
I find it funny how she's arguing with someone who she used as proof to support her claim with what they meant in the words that person posted. Given a choice between believing someone who wrote something and someone who merely read and interpreted that writing, I would side with the author every time; surely they know what they meant when they were writing it.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #376 By the way, are you also a coward? Why ignore posts 364 and 368? Where's your legal diatribe of non-applicable, legal jargon to defend their irrefutable fraud?
Amy, I have addressed the points in both those posts on more than one occasion with you and on more than one thread. I'm sorry if you either didn't see them because they proven you wrong or distorted by you, yet again or you didn't understand my reply. You had four points for your claims I addressed over six points... it's been covered; however, keep implying that I didn't, for sure someone will believe you that my "ignoring" them makes everything I said a lie.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #376 How is that possible, considering the fact that I--ME, MYSELF, PERSONALLY, AMY--am the one who stated that it is EASY TO OPEN AN LLC ONLINE? Rat is the one who stated that it is "impossible," which is an utter lie to which he FAILS to admit. So, how could you possibly have stated that you "agree with rat" that it is easy to open an LLC online when he stated the EXACT OPPOSITE, unless that was an error on your part?
Yet another example of you seeing only what you want and misinterpreting something someone said. I NEVER said it is difficult to register an LLC, which I've proven to be true, I never said it wasn't easy. When you posted that anybody can file and LLC online in 30 minutes I did tell you that it is impossible to do so. I was just about to clarify my point but after seeing the forms from bizfilings you need in either state to file I would love to meet the person who can fill in all that information in under and hour let alone half that time. I suppose if they used the same half-assed research and detail to truth and acuracy they could, but most of us don't work that way.
Quoting: rat289, Post #347 There is no way at all to get that documentation to the in 30 minutes as you claim.
Quoting: rat289, Post #345 By the way, I, or anyone else on the planet, can open an LLC in 30 minutes at BizFilings.com. Amy you're grasping at straws here. That is a state website. That LLC is registered by the state and on the states computer. If you've had any dealing with state government you know nothing takes 30minutes to do... and you're certainly not going to get them to fudge a date. Also, I can tell you from personal experience that you can't file and LLC on line. They require actual documentation.
These are all of the mentions I made that in any way can be interpreted as me attesting to the ease or difficulty in creating LLC's. Where exactly do I say they are difficult? Please, point it out to me without using your wild imagination in interpreting my words.
Why would I? I've done it. All you need to do is fill out the paperwork, send it in and wait. Learn to understand what you read before trying to pick it apart sweetheart. What you are doing here is trying to develop credibility by getting hung up on a semantic. What relevance is there even IF your interpretation is the right one? In your eyes if you are right it will prove the rest of my argument wrong. In truth, the rest of his statement is true. Don't get your underwear in a bunch, nobody has taken away the fact that you did in fact say setting up an LLC is easy, just as I said that the existence of an LLC brings a certain level of legitimacy to the company.
Quoting: pious, Post #375 As I have stated 1,000,000 times previously, my position has NOTHING--now, open your eyes and READ--to do with prejudice, racism, or geography. If I were "racist," I'd admit such.
The last person to know they are prejudice is a person who is so. If you were able to insert such objectivity into your life we wouldn't be having this debate at all*.
*Subtext definition: Since you are incapable of understand true meaning out of a statement I will spell it out. That sentence means if you were able to be objective enough to determine you weren't prejudiced you would be able to be objective enough to view the facts and admit YOU ARE WRONG!
Ok, I know, she drew me into this again. I meant to reply to pious but couldn't help pointing out more of her ridiculous comments. Sorry, my bad.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 04:21PM
| #378 |
|
Quoting: rat289, Post #377 Quoting: Amy1978, Post #376 By the way, are you also a coward? Why ignore posts 364 and 368? Where's your legal diatribe of non-applicable, legal jargon to defend their irrefutable fraud? Amy, I have addressed the points in both those posts on more than one occasion with you and on more than one thread. I'm sorry if you either didn't see them because they proven you wrong or distorted by you, yet again or you didn't understand my reply. You had four points for your claims I addressed over six points... it's been covered; however, keep implying that I didn't, for sure someone will believe you that my "ignoring" them makes everything I said a lie.
You're a filthy liar! You have NEVER addressed this NEW evidence in 364 and 368! Coward.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 04:31PM
| #379 |
|
Since rat is a coward and award-winning spinner, here is my point once again:
"An "ESL writer with poor grammar skills" is ANY person of ANY skin tone or ANY religion (from Pakistan, Germany, Spain, India, Ireland, Sweden, etc.) who uses flawed grammar, syntax, word use, spelling, punctuation, etc. when writing in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE. As a general rule, they tend to work for much lower wages than qualified, native English-speaking writers from America or Great Brtitain because it is more difficult for them to get work as a result of their flawed skills in English language writing. The fact that these less-than-qualified writers accept a FRACTION of the compensation that American or British professionals makes them very attractive to the foreign companies, like bestessays, whose owners are also ESL. Here's the key: do these "foreign sites" admit that they hire "ESL writers with poor grammar"? NO, they don't! In fact, they blatantly LIE to the American public that they hire "ONLY native English-speaking writers." WHY DO THEY LIE? They know perfectly well that average, American customers do not want to hire a researcher with WORSE writing skills than themselves! So, the crooks at EssayWriters.net hire STUDENTS and ANY ESL WRITER WITH A KEYBOARD, as long as he or she will work cheaply, and then EssayWriters.net turns around and lies to the public--on bestessays.com and superiorpapers.com--that ALL of their writers are "native English speakers with a Master or PhD degree."AGAIN, WHY DO THEY LIE? Lying enables BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com to charge a lower fee to clients than any of the legitimately-operating companies based on American or British soil. Do they care when customers complain about the terrible grammar in the final product? No."
Are the ESL writers who work for EssayWriters.net bad people? No.
Are they potentially more or less intelligent than me or any other qualified, American/British writer with a Master or PhD degree from an American or Brtitish university? No.
Are they at fault because EssayWriters.net purposely mislabels their qualifications to the public? No.
Is the average ESL writer's skills in the English language inferior to mine? Yes.
Are my skills in the Pakistani, Indian, German, or Swedish language inferior to those of qualified, native speakers of those language? Yes, of course!
Could I ever, in good conscience, allow my employer to falsely label my skills to the public as a "native Indian-speaking writer" in order to rip people off? Absolutely not!
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 04:33PM
| #380 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #378 You're a filthy liar! You have NEVER addressed this NEW evidence! Coward.
Whatever Amy. I went through all 15,000 plus words I've posted on this topic and found several instances where I did. I'm sorry if it wasn't to your satisfaction... again, you're acting like a drowning man clinging to a block of wood in a desperate attempt to save their life... do you get that or do you need me to define the sub-text for you?
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 06:35PM
| #381 |
|
Again, you're a side-stepping coward. You haven't addressed 364 and 368, and I will prove it by posting EssayWriters' actual ad and its URL:
**********************
Job Description:
A research company is looking for efficient, responsible, creative and ambitious people to work in one of the leading companies in the industry. EssayWriters.net holds a five-year experience in operating in the research industry and is entitled to produce genuine and exclusive pieces of writing and content.
Whether with experience or with burning desire to improve writing skills and find the ways to achieve your goals, EssayWriters.net will gladly welcome writers, journalists, content writers, and college students possessing research and writing skills on our impressively large and friendly team.
EssayWriters.net gives its employees a wonderful opportunity to grow and improve. With the unique system of bonuses, developed by our HR department you have many opportunities to get additional rewards for excellent work.
Being an employee of EsayWriters.net, you get a wide choice of assignments to work on, two times a moth payment and endless opportunities to increase your level of writing. For more information please visit our site essaywriters.net and hurry to join a friendly team.
Warm regards,
EssayWriters.net
**********************
http://www.thejobspider.com/job/view-job-1946503.html
Rat, please direct me to the exact posting in this forum in which you defend the blatant fraud in this particular job posting.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 07:30PM
| #382 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #381 Again, you're a side-stepping coward. You haven't addressed 364 and 368, and I will prove it by posting EssayWriters' actual ad and its URL: ********************** Job Description:
Are you freaking out of your mind?? How in any way, shape or form is this fraud? Bad grammar in a couple of places but no fraud. Reading this a normal person would deduce that they are looking for writers with or without experience. They are claiming to be one of the leading companies not the leading company which isn't either a lie or unethical... it's argumentative at best. Since you've proven an inability to process and define OUR native language I'll take a few moments to define it for you.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #381 A research company is looking for efficient, responsible, creative and ambitious people to work in one of the leading companies in the industry. EssayWriters.net holds a five-year experience in operating in the research industry and is entitled to produce genuine and exclusive pieces of writing and content.
Hi reader, we are a research company and are looking for some writers. We need you to be responsible, creative and ambitious. If you are you may get a job with us, a leading company in the industry with five years experience in the research industry. We aspire (a common mistake to those foreign to our language is replacing aspire with entitled) to produce genuine and exclusive pieces of writing and content.
As I pointed out what you have here is some poor grammar and a word that easily gets confused in translation. But you know about that confusion because you did the professional thing and researched it.
A side note... I think I know what they did to you. They fired you, didn't they? You're work was sub-standard because you fail to research. You have shown an impressive level of careless research in this thread. If I had to put money on it I'd put it here. Let's go on...
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #381 Whether with experience or with burning desire to improve writing skills and find the ways to achieve your goals, EssayWriters.net will gladly welcome writers, journalists, content writers, and college students possessing research and writing skills on our impressively large and friendly team.
Those with experience or a desire to improve their skills are welcome to apply. Whether you are a writer, journalist, content writer or college student you are welcome to apply and as long as you prove to have good RESEARCH and writing skills you will be able to join our friendly team.
Again, what this is saying is if you don't have the skill-level to satisfy customers you will be shown the door.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #381 EssayWriters.net gives its employees a wonderful opportunity to grow and improve. With the unique system of bonuses, developed by our HR department you have many opportunities to get additional rewards for excellent work.
Here at Essay Writers you'll have opportunity to grow and improve. We have a unique system of bonuses and rewards for excellent work.
The rest of that block is a failed attempt to punch up the translated point.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #381 Being an employee of EsayWriters.net, you get a wide choice of assignments to work on, two times a moth payment and endless opportunities to increase your level of writing. For more information please visit our site essaywriters.net and hurry to join a friendly team.
As an employee (which technically should be contractor; another grammatical/translation gaff and hardly criminal) you will have a wide choice of assignments and payment twice a month. The second to last sentence is just rehash from a few blocks above. The last sentence... For more information please visit our site then apply... because we have a highly difficult system to navigate here in order to be paid.
I think that last line is what tripped you up. Your propensity to not research things probably led you to NOT read all the rules and regulations, and if you did you probably only saw what you wanted to; just as you ahve done in trying to prove them to be crooks in this thread.
The fact of the matter, as I said before about this... you have nothing here. You can't compare a help add to an advertisement add. By its nature advertisement is to bring you in the door and leaves you there at your own risk. From there they are required to provide all relevant information and it is YOUR job to read it and understand and if you don't understand it, to ask questions that will help you understand. They say ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law just as ignorance is no excuse for getting taken.
I'm sure if we knew the whole story a complete investigation would find YOU not the company to be at fault for your woes. Learn how to understand what you read before you try putting stuff out there for people to read. You are a complete and utter HACK. I'm sorry you don't possess the common sense needed to see the error of your ways. I'm sorry your prejudice blinds you from seeing facts that are in front of your eyes. You're a battlestar fan, I surprised you understand and are able to follow such a complicated show but then again... you may only get it on one level, you may not understand the underlying story lines and character arcs.
You call me a coward? I've offered you a chance to check me out and you've taken a pass. I've requested you post your story... the true one... and still you avoid it. As you told me once before... take a look in the mirror honey and perhaps you'll see how ugly your actions make you look.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 08:28PM
| #383 |
|
Yes, you are a coward. Where's your proof that I "got fired" by EssayWriters.net? LOL, nice try! I don't work for chump change, buddy.
I apologize for branding you incorrectly. You are a "clueless coward." You're battling to the last man for a fraudulent company about which you know a grand total of nothing! You have no clue how their sites interweave and work hand-in-hand to rob writers of due income (for reasons they often claim involve poor grammar) and deceive customers by using bait-and-switch tactics (customer orders what he/she is led to believe is a document written by an MBA-holding American, and receives a poorly written document by an ESL STUDENT. You don't see (or choose not to acknowledge simply because you can't stand to agree with me) how they twist wording to fool customers.
Here's a simple, 3-tier breakdown of how EssayWriters.net works:
1. EssayWriters.net is a "company" that hires just about anybody with a typewriter, including ESL STUDENTS. Other posters here have proven that EssayWriters.net will hire even the most unqualified writers. (You can search for these posts, if you'd like.)
2. EssayWriters.net owns BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com. Both BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com offer writing services to the public, with the main source of business coming from misled, American consumers. Now, numerous people here have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that EssayWriters.net hires unqualified writers and ESL STUDENTS to write the papers that deceived, American consumers order from BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com. In fact, EssayWriters' own employment ads (http://www.thejobspider.com/job/view-job-1946503.html) prove the fact that they hire ESL STUDENTS! They openly ASK for amateur students!
3. BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com falsely advertise to the public that they hire "only" or "mostly" native English-speaking, "certified" writers with Master or PhD degrees. But guess who really writes most of the papers. That's right--ESL writers without master degrees and amateur students. Why can't EssayWriters just be honest and state that "We hire mostly ESL writers and students, but we do have a small number of native English-speaking Americans on staff"? Why do they continue to lie after receiving so much heat? Well, if they don't continiue to lie, they know that they won't get orders from the vast majority of American customers! Their income will be cut in half over night!
"Our company cooperates only with certified writers, MD holders, professors, researchers and editors. All of them are native English speakers . . . ."
- bestessays.com HOME PAGE
"Our writers have received education and have gained experience in many fields. Most of them hold Master and PhD degrees, they are world-recognized and highly in demand."
- http://www.superiorpapers.com/faq.php
"Native English professionals"
http://www.superiorpapers.com/term_paper_writing_services.php
Dozens of ESL writers (including STUDENTS and others with only BA degrees or LESS) who currently work or formerly worked for EssayWriters.net have posted in this forum.
What takes the "hypocritical cake" is that these sites actually have the gall to CRITICIZE other companies for hiring ESL ("foreign") writers (http://www.superiorpapers.com/term_paper_writing_services.php)! Man, you talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Rat, aren't you going to accuse THEM of being prejudice racists for calling out the factual weaknesses of ESL writers? Let's see you justify their calculated hypocrisy, rat! Boy, I can't wait. I just know that this will be your best work yet!
Now, RAT, how can you look at these purposely contradictory statements at EssayWriters.net and BestEssays/SuperiorPapers and, with a straight face, state that this does not constitute intentional CONSUMER FRAUD? (Set aside your obvious resentment towards me and answer honestly, as if your mother were asking the question.) I don't want a diatribe. I don't want any topic-switching, focus-switching, or side-stepping. I want a simple answer to this very focused question.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 14, 07, 09:50PM
| #384 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: rat289, Post #382 A side note... I think I know what they did to you. They fired you, didn't they? You're work was sub-standard because you fail to research. You have shown an impressive level of careless research in this thread. If I had to put money on it I'd put it here. Let's go on...
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 Yes, you are a coward. Where's your proof that I "got fired" by EssayWriters.net? LOL, nice try! I don't work for chump change, buddy.
Example 1 of your poor reading comprehension skills. You missed the word that puts this entire block in the context of an OPINION – "think". Chump change? I doubt you work in the industry at all. I bet "would you like fries with that" is a common phrase for you. No professional writer would misinterpret as much text as you have in this thread alone.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 I apologize for branding you incorrectly. You are a "clueless coward." You're battling to the last man for a fraudulent company about which you know a grand total of nothing!
I know nothing but yet I have managed to churn up more facts than you have. Just because you have a computer and can spell "google" doesn't mean you are researching. There are avenues you have to take to get to the truth because the truth is seldom in the contents of a webpage and your failure to understand that is the cause of this entire debate. Case in point would be the numerous times you screamed they had no LLC on file; one of those "avenues" led me to discover that they do in fact have an LLC on file. I could go on... but what's the point... you won't accept the amount of mistakes you've made no matter the evidence.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 You have no clue how their sites interweave and work hand-in-hand to rob writers of due income (for reasons they often claim involve poor grammar) and deceive both customers by using bait-and-switch tactics (customer orders what he/she is led to believe is a document written by an MBA-holding American, and receives a poorly written document by an ESL STUDENT. You don't see (or choose not to acknowledge simply because you can't stand to agree with me) how they twist wording to fool customers.
And you have no clue what this debate was about. It was about Essay Writers and whether or not you'll get paid by them. YOU tried to make it about the entire web of overseas companies in this field. YOU were the one who wrongfully accused them of criminal action. YOU were the one who had no proof. YOU were the one who allowed her prejudice to shine through. YOU were the one who has lied on more than one occasion in this thread. YOU are the one who doesn't understand both the burden of proof and how business works. YOU, my dear, are the one who is clueless here, not me.
Some examples of racist/prejudice comments by you in this post alone:
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 1. EssayWriters.net is a "company" that hires just about anybody with a typewriter, including ESL STUDENTS.
You made your point of this sentence before tossing in the "ESL STUDENTS". Not to mention... all caps! You never miss a chance to put the term ESL in any derogatory sentence when it comes to skill. More comments:
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 what he/she is led to believe is a document written by an MBA-holding American, and receives a poorly written document by an ESL STUDENT.
This one is borderline, had you not used ESL in a derogatory manner over 200 times in this thread alone I would've seen nothing wrong with it.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 EssayWriters.net is a "company" that hires just about anybody with a typewriter, including ESL STUDENTS.
One more hit on ESL students. "Anybody with a typewriter" is more than enough to get your point across to me. I should also point out that when I say get your point across I'm not implying you are right, I mean that you got what was in your head to the page.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 Now, numerous people here have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that EssayWriters.net hires unqualified writers and ESL STUDENTS Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 Native English professionals "http://www.superiorpapers.com/term_paper_writing_services.php
Do I really need to go on with your racist/prejudiced comments? Are you beginning to see how you're coming across as seriously biased?
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 2. EssayWriters.net owns BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com. Both BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com offer writing services to the public, with the main source of business coming from misled, American consumers.
Proof: Any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something.
Fact: A statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened.
You have proof of you claim? Facts? Evidence to support the libelous claims you've made about this company. I'm sorry but a few copied pages aren't proof. Don't believe me? Do a little research on the burden of proof or take a $100 bucks and talk to a lawyer for an hour about your claims and your proof. I assure you, you have no proof what-so-ever!
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 Dozens of ESL writers (including STUDENTS and others with only BA degrees or LESS) who currently work or formerly worked for EssayWriters.net have posted in this forum. What takes the cake is that these sites actually CRITICIZE other companies for hiring ESL writers ( http://www.superiorpapers.com/term_paper_writing_services.php )! HAH, let's see you explain your way out of THAT, rat!
Yes, dozens have posted. Some claimed not to have gotten paid and others have stated they've gotten paid. You in your bias have dismissed EVERYONE who had anything positive to say about Essay Writers. You've called them representatives of the company, crooks too, out to help the company con writers out of money. You've made these claims with absolutely no facts, just your highly uninformed opinion which is also tainted by your serious prejudice and hate.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 3. BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com falsely advertise to the public that they hire "only" or "mostly" native English-speaking, "certified" writers with Master or PhD degrees. But guess who really writes most of the papers. That's right--ESL writers without master degrees and amateur students.
There is nothing wrong. Nothing what-so-ever with the use of "mostly" in their advertisement. The use of "only" is wrong if they do use writers that aren't native English speaking; however, upon further review they corrected themselves inside their site so no fraud or crime has been commited. In order for there to be a crime there must be damage caused. Clicking on a page isn't damage. If Joe Customer saw they only use PhD writers in their add and goes to the site, reads all the information and learns they use mostly PhD writers, he's been informed, if he decides to do business that is his choice. If he doesn't, he's just out of some time and that is not considered damage. Again your only seeing what you want and ignoring the rest.
AS for the last sentence, they also do have writers with Masters and PhD's working for them. They also have writers with Bachelors, Associates and no degree at all but years of practical experience. Just one more FACT you wouldn't know about because you refuse to research your libelous claims before making them.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #383 Now, RAT, how can you look at these purposely contradictory statements at EssayWriters.net and BestEssays/SuperiorPapers and, with a straight face, state that this does not constitute intentional CONSUMER FRAUD? (Set aside your obvious resentment towards me and answer honestly, as if your mother were asking the question.) I don't want a diatribe. I don't want any topic-switching, focus-switching, or side-stepping. I want a simple answer to this very focused question.
Consumer Fraud: Consumer Fraud Consumer Fraud has a formal definition in the law. It is not the same as "unfair" or a "ripoff".
That statement about what consumer fraud is comes straight from Georgetown University Law. With a straight face, the answer to your question is NO. They are required by law to make available all information relevant to the contract they are entering with a consumer and they do. They are required by law to make all relevant information available to all contractors they are entering contracts with and they do. It's a gray area, a slippery slope, but by definition of the law they are doing nothing wrong.
Your problem, or one of them any way, is that you have no idea about presumption of innocence. If you believe they are creating a violation of law you must file a complaint and surrender whatever evidence you may have. In your case, you have none. Nothing. Again, the webpages you've posted are not conducive to a violation of the law or the legal definition of consumer fraud. Your ignorance of the law and business has led you to run to this forum and start pointing fingers, and why shouldn't you? After all they are owned by the people you hate most – foreigners. Your prejudice combined with you ignorance left you to believe you had very real proof that they are crooks, when in reality you have no such proof.
I have no such resentment of you. I only know you by your actions here. I think you're immature and unseasoned. I think you're very bitter towards these people because of something they or someone similar has done to you. I think you are so prejudiced toward ESL writers that the mere thought of them drives you into a state of crazieness. I don't think you have any job in any writing field unless it is putting books away on a shelf. I think you need to understand that making unsubstantiated claims against businesses and people is irresponsible. I'd love to see you on other forums I'm part of because debating with you is fun and for the most part, the main reason I'm still plugging away at this. What you don't understand is through it all I've managed to expose your bias and prejudice, thus reducing your credibility. The fact that I was able to discredit your claims is just sauce for the goose. You will never see you've been stomped but others will and that is all that matters.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Edited by: Amy1978 Apr 14, 07, 11:07PM
| #385 |
|
Another long-winded diatribe in yet another failed attempt to move attention away from the crooks and onto Amy. Just as I predicted . . . .
Ah, so now you're going to suggest that EssayWriters.net does NOT own BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com? Hahahahahah. Pack your bags.
Writers here have stated that when one logs-in to EssayWriters.net as a writer, one can see references all over the place to BOTH of those domains. Don't believe me, RAT? Ask any one of their writers here. Current or past writers for EssayWriters.net, please post your information regarding EssayWriters.net's ownership of BestEssays/SuperiorPapers.
Coward, why don't you answer my question? Are you going to label EssayWriters.net as "prejudice" because THEY purposely and hypocritically degrade the talents of "ESL" and "FOREIGN WRITERS" even though most of their writers are ESL? What, did you conveniently miss that part of my previous post? What a pompous jackass!
From SuperiorPapers.com:
"Fake and Fraudulent Foreign Companies" use "Foreign, Wannabee writers."
- http://www.superiorpapers.com/term_paper_writing_services.php
Now, let the bullsh*t excuses roll in . . . .
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:17AM
| #386 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #385 Another long-winded diatribe in yet another failed attempt to move attention away from the crooks and onto Amy. Just as I predicted . . . .
Yet another long diatribe that answers your questions but you refuse to see that and accept it... just as I predicted! You're replies to my posts are all the same Amy... bla bla bla "they're crooks because you won't answer this question... which by the way I did... THREE TIMES and I assure you there won't be a FOURTH... bla bla bla... they're crooks because I came across this statement in their advert.... Which by the way is perfectly legal.... Bla bla bla... they're criminals because they don't have an LLC on file... which with very little effort I proved they did... so you can stop your rehashing of you four pieces of so called evidence. I'm getting tired of typing long rebuttals in a futile effort to prevent you from twisting any more data in your desperate effort to prove THIS ONE SINGLE company crooked.
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #385 Ah, so now you're going to suggest that EssayWriters.net does NOT own BestEssays.com and SuperiorPapers.com? Hahahahahah. Pack your bags.
I've made no such claims except in your head Amy, it must be a wonderful place there on planet Amy. I'm attempting to narrow the scope of this because in order to cover up the fact you have no proof of anything you've splintered it and have gone all over the place here. Plain and simple my research and argument was on and about Essay Writers and nothing more, other than the LLC which you lied about. The question was about Essay Writers and you were the one who attacked the comments from the representative... you called her a liar with no basis... uncool... You've got two choices here... no three choices... Give up, keep talking in circles with your "evidence" which isn't evidence at all... or take me up on my offer and come check me out... The first would be the wisest, I'm done playing with you on the second and the third will finally prove beyond all reasonable doubt that YOU are full of shit when you say you're not prejudiced.
What you fail to understand is you are so off topic it isn't even funny. The issue here isn't who owns who or who's scamming who. The issue is and always has been if you write for Essay Writers will you get paid. You're the one that has taken this subject on this wild ride because you have a hard-on for this company for reasons you WILL NOT STATE... that is a cowardly action... so look in the mirror. All you questions both valid and invalid have been addressed by me. I have backed down from nothing you've thrown at me... like the lie you told about the LLC you've also backed down more than once when I posed challenges to you... Most rats are afraid of the light... I'm not one of them... you on the other hand are affraid of the light. Unless you're going to post the real and completely true story of what they did to you don't bother posting a reply... it will fall on deaf ears. Who's the coward now?
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #385 Coward, why don't you answer my question? Are you going to label EssayWriters.net as "prejudice" because THEY purposely and hypocritically degrade the talents of "ESL" and "FOREIGN WRITERS"
Nope. Not at all. They're valid in saying that. It is a truism that some ESL drafted work is sub-standard. In advertising they're making a valid claim in an effort to coax business. The difference between their use and yours is they don't spend hours every single day slamming and taking cheap shots at ESL and Foreign Writers. Like I said a post or two ago... if you weren't posting so much hate and intolerance most of us wouldn't think you're prejudice or that your motives are suspect.
Now I'm clearly stating that the above paragraph on a whole or in part is NOT supporting any of Amy's claims. At no time did I intentionally argue that ALL ESL and foreign writers were qualified to write. I need this disclosure because as most of you know... she's going to quote parts of it she can twist into some sort of flip on my behalf... Now Amy, go to bed like a good little girl and have big dreams of being an employed writer and we'll see how you feel in the morning.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Edited by: rat289 Apr 15, 07, 12:42AM
| #387 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
EXTRA, EXTRA, READ ALL ABOUT IT! Amy was put to the test and failed... follow the link... if you dare.
http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/9_187_0.html#msg2124
Oh and just so you know dear... I'm working out the count of how many times you've posted the same or edited versions of the same webpage from their site, the number of times you needlessly took a cheap shot at ESL writers and how many times you twisted the same set of words and "evidence" in order to prove your case.
It'll be fun... trust me... keep an eye out for it, coming soon... a "by the numbers" look at her tactics.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:43AM
| #388 |
|
You are such an incredible LOSER and LIAR. I've had about enough of your EssayWriters.net promos. You'll probably get banned soon enough. How unfortunate . . . .
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:47AM
| #389 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #388 You are such an incredible LOSER and LIAR. I've had about enough of your EssayWriters.net promos. You'll probably get banned soon enough. How unfortunate . . . .
If I get banned it either means you are in the ownership of this site or the webmaster is as clueless and biased as you... face it honey... you've been outed and your big mouth isn't going to get you out of it. NITE NITE
|
|
| paperchasefraud |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:48AM
| #390 |
Joined: Apr 6, 07
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
|
Hey Rat,
Believe me, you are wasting your precious time (on her). Let us leave the proper authorities to deal with it. Class suits when maintained can open memberships to forums by the issuance of subpoena. Perhaps damages, propietary and personal, have been sustained already. Perhaps, diplomatic representations are being made for derogatory remarks against foreign states.
You see, I do not want to be a party to obstruct any investigation. This is my last post as I do not want to further dignify her comments. So perhaps, you can do the same thing.
It is an exercise in futility--she has her personal interests at stake in doing what she is doing. Let her twist all the information . . .in the end, truth will prevail--of course in the proper fora.
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:49AM
| #391 |
|
Drop dead, you filthy piece of EssayWriters.net trash.
|
|
| kissncook |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:50AM
| #392 |
Joined: Apr 15, 07
Posts: 2
|
I have been following this thread for two days now and can honestly say, Amy you have been babbling on and on and going in complete circles both days! I came here to check out this site seriously. At first sight, by reading the forums and some posts I was a little hesitant, but then Rat stepped in and really opened my eyes with some good old fashioned research. Some writers will miss some good opportunities by just listening to the likes of you and taking it as truth when you did little research and only posted what made your stance seem valid. That is very misleading and not fair. You started the gossip but in the end we found out the truth. Thanks Rat! :D
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:50AM
| #393 |
|
paperchasefraud, FU and yoru legal bullsh*t. You want a legal battle? BRING IT!
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:51AM
| #394 |
|
kissncook, you're not fooling anyone. You are rat289. Get a life.
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:52AM
| #395 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: kissncook, Post #392 I have been following this thread for two days now and can honestly say, Amy you have been babbling on and on and going in complete circles both days! I came here to check out this site seriously. At first sight, by reading the forums and some posts I was a little hesitant, but then Rat stepped in and really opened my eyes with some good old fashioned research. Some writers will miss some good opportunities by just listening to the likes of you and taking it as truth when you did little research and only posted what made your stance seem valid. That is very misleading and not fair. You started the gossip but in the end we found out the truth. Thanks Rat! :D
You're welcome kissncook, that's what this was all for... I get a good feeling whenever I shut down someone like that...
|
|
| paperchasefraud |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:56AM
| #396 |
Joined: Apr 6, 07
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #393 paperchasefraud, FU and yoru legal bullsh*t. You want a legal battle? BRING IT!
You have lost your credibility and integrity here--what more in court--where fair rules of evidence apply.
Goodluck to you !!
|
|
| Amy1978 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 12:56AM
| #397 |
|
Sorry, filthy rat. It's painfully obvious that you are "kissncook." The hallmarks of your writing style are present in both posts. You are a thread hijacker, multiple username hack, and an EssayWriters.net stooge. Three strikes, and you're out.
Admin?
|
|
| rat289 |
|
Apr 15, 07, 01:02AM
| #398 |
Joined: Apr 12, 07
Threads: 1
Posts: 167
|
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #397 Sorry, filthy rat. It's painfully obvious that you are "kissncook." The hallmarks of your writing style are present in both posts. You are a thread hijacker, multiple username hack, and an EssayWriters.net stooge. Three strikes, and you're out. Admin?
Yes admin, please check it out... kissncook is a friend of mine.. the one who found this site for me after finding Essay Writers... can prove it too... I have all my IM's from her archived... not to mention other ways the admin can tell if I'm Kissncook... just like the rules of evidence you know nothing about the nuts and bolts of websites.... they know you're IP, they know your ISP, they know your MAC... just to name three and those three don't match, they couldn't... we live in different counties....
But I understand you're desire to get me banned... before me you're BS came across as true... you were a hero to these people... and now... now they know just how full of crap you are... sorry Amy, if the admin is fair and impartial you'll be the one banned for putting them at risk with your libelous comments.
|
|
| paperchasefraud |
|
Apr 15, 07, 01:08AM
| #399 |
Joined: Apr 6, 07
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
|
No use Rat. This seems to be her kingdom and perhaps, other fora too. She plays by her dirty rules. She has been engaged for that.
|
|
| paperchasefraud |
|
Apr 15, 07, 01:12AM
| #400 |
Joined: Apr 6, 07
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
|
I am signing out, Rat. Let her use --her street-level fighting and her foul mouth to fight her 'cause.' It is the only way she knows.
|
|
