CNN doing a good job, BestEssays.com got an "F"

I'd love to explain the simple lessons of the course to you and how your previous posts show how much of an idiot you are, but those lessons don't come free and the latter is pretty evident to everyone reading this thread.

Care to name someone who is honestly on your side?

2) Writers who work for EW, A-R, etc are criminals: I disagree. Some are highly qualified and, unfortunately, are being discriminated against. Due to either nationality or geographic location, their applications are rejected by what we call the "legitimate" companies. They are left with no choice at all. I doubt that any of them (I am referring to the truly qualified ones and not the multitudes whose hands should be severed for ever daring to write in English) enjoy the working conditions they are subjected to - fines, low wages, delays in payments, etc. Unfortunately, they really do not believe that they have anywhere else to go and many need the money. So, I believe they are victims ....

While maintaining that the writers are not criminals (the good ones, the qualified ones are not; the others ....)

Once again, my statements regarding the skill-level and legal culpability of EssayWriters.net's writers, in general, do NOT apply to you. Get it? I always have and always will maintain that you are a criminal. Your ongoing activities—in this forum and elsewhere—in support of EssayWriters.net's illegal practices seal your fate in the eyes of the law.

Your statements mean what you want them to mean, and you change what you want them to mean when you need to.

We all know it.

God.. you get one opinion that doesn't agree with you and you go ballistic.

Qualified ESL writers - not criminals. They are trying to make the best of a bad situation - not offered any real opportunities with the legits and, therefore, go through any open doors.

OR, I get what you're typing, but my point is that, by legal definition,

I hope you guys don't mind.

we have not only broken the law, but we have also committed crime against the "Constitution".

Really? Who is "we"? Show some balls and name names. Does your "we" include widely respected members like OR, pheelyks, or FreelanceWriter?

I believe that, in the "Constitutions" of countries like the USA and the Philippines, proper education is a basic human right. Depriving students of this is actually a human rights violation. When we do students' homeworks or exams for them, we deprive them of the ability to learn properly. This, to me, is tantamount to depriving them of their education. It seems to me that by doing this, we have not only broken the law, but we have also committed crime against the "Constitution".

EW operates in the USA, Ukraine and the Philippines. All these countries contain this basic right in their "Constitutions" (I am not sure about the other countries). To me, this says that EW is committing a crime; and if I knowingly participate in it, I am a criminal too.

I've been in jail for three years now. the food sucks and everyone is an *******. it sure is lonely here in the big house. I have a plan to bust loose, though-- I got this rock hammer, and every day...

I like your point. Perhaps I was too hasty in judging the kind of service we provide. In my judgement, I may have "thrown the baby out with the bathwater".

However, I don't regret leaving EW. They just didn't feel right to me.

I don't regret leaving EW.

They just didn't feel right to me.

I got this rock hammer, and every day...

All companies are guilty of this, not just ew.

We provide models. Some of us very very clearly (in large print) advise students NOT TO SUBMIT the work as their own. In so doing, they would not only be misusing our services and violating their institution's academic integrity policy but, they would be CHEATING THEMSELVES. Research work provided is supposed to be used as a model. Students can use the same sources we have, the same argument and structure. They, however, have to rewrite it in theor own words and, importantly, add their voice to it ... include class lecture material, etc. We do not sell homework - we provide academic research assistancy services.

Yeah, sure. ^_^ FreelanceWriter, pheelyks, and OR, do you think that WB is right in calling me and other competent ESL writers who work for ew and ar as freelance writers, criminals? Wait, OR already gave her answer (no, right?), so that leaves pheelyks and FreelanceWriter. Well?

As I said earlier, the law is clear - you are right. This was just my opinion. The law, however, imposes a certain obligation upon employees/service contractors/freelancer - if the company is fraudulent and you have knowledge of that but continue to work with them anyways, you become an accomplice.

Your statements mean what you want them to mean, and you change what you want them to mean when you need to.

Quote me, liar. I changed nothing. I made a statement that applies to EW's writers, in general, not to YOU.

I contend, specifically, that an unqualified, ESL writer who is aware that the "company" intentionally misrepresents his/her location, skills, and experience is a willing accessory to the calculated fraud campaign and crimes of that company.

"competent ESL writers who work for EssayWriters.net and Academia-Research.com" are not certain criminals in the eyes of the law until after they become aware of the companies' fraud and knowingly continue to promote and enable the companies' illegal practices.

By generally excluding foreign applications, companies like ET are protecting American consumers by eliminating any possibility that unqualified, overseas, ESL writers will slip through the cracks.

So you finally admit that ET would never hire foreign writers no matter how qualified they are.

You want proof that ET sometimes makes exceptions for exceedingly qualified writers in foreign countries? Contact them and ask. I did. You'll get the exact same answer: "Yes."

As with any company's public employment policy, ET's is in place to let the public masses know the rules concerning which writers can and cannot approach the company for potential employment. However, this public policy has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on whether or not the company privately takes on—from time to time—exceedingly qualified, ESL writers via referral and/or personal connections.

Your statements mean what you want them to mean, and you change what you want them to mean when you need to. It's sad but that's who you are, WB. We all know it. Now, why don't you keep your crappy opinions and let the good people here vote on the matter that you asked them to vote on? ^_^

2. a qualified, ESL writer who seeks out and/or accepts employment as a "professional" writer-for-hire in the English language is NOT inherently fraudulent; however, if that qualified, ESL writer continues to work for a company like EssayWriters.net after becoming aware of the company's illegal activities, the writer becomes an accomplice to the crimes of the company (by willingly helping the company to generate the revenue that enables the company to perpetuate the cycle of fraud through its majority of unqualified, ESL writers).

No, he doesn't. The writer is still just a writer and his activities are still not criminal, period.

Take your defamation tactics elsewhere.

EW_writer, are you going to dispute the law now?

For the record, OR and pheelyks have already acknowledged that I am correct in my assertion that willing accomplices like you are criminals, as defined by the law. I'm quite certain that both FreelanceWriter and exwriter will convey the same message.

Again, the customers reading this thread should be aware that WB's agenda is simply to dissuade you from buying from foreign essay mills.

EW_writer, are you going to dispute the law now?

Why don't you quote them where they said so? Then I can show everyone that you've just quoted them partially to make it seem like they were agreeing with you about me.

. . . WB could be right in saying that you are technically an accessory to fraud. If that is the case, then you are criminal . . . .

As I said earlier, the law is clear - you are right. This was just my opinion. The law, however, imposes a certain obligation upon employees/service contractors/freelancer - if the company is fraudulent and you have knowledge of that but continue to work with them anyways, you become an accomplice.

I remember, in your last reply to me, you said, "Research work provided is supposed to be used as a model. Students can use the same sources we have, the same argument and structure. They, however, have to rewrite it in theor own words and, importantly, add their voice to it ... include class lecture material, etc. We do not sell homework - we provide academic research assistancy services."

I was just thinking... If this is the case, maybe writing companies should take out the "revision request" option from their sites. Since our work should only be used as a "model" for our clients to follow, revising our work upon their request defeats the purpose of, simply, providing a model for them to follow.

Again, just another opinion from my feeble little mind. Uh oh! This is dangerous! Thinking is never a good thing for me. ;)

Dude... I don't think you're that naive.

companies based in the U.S.

"The purpose of Universal Research LLC is to provide unique research that is intended for use in your further works and should be used as a model work."
http://www.bestessays.com/disclaimer.php

"The purpose of Universal Research Inc Limited is to provide unique research that is intended for use in your further works and should be used as a model work."
http://www.superiorpapers.com/disclaimer.php

"The purpose of Universal Research LLC is to provide unique research that is intended for use in your further works and should be used as a model work."
http://www.besttermpaper.com/terms-and-conditions.html

Stop being mean to newbies! Whaaahhhhhhhhh!

Dude... I don't think you're that naive.

1. ". . . we do not make any guarantees regarding your grades and that our agreement is strictly to provide you with an original reference document . . . ."

2. "The research material that we provide to you is available as a unique reference that is designed to assist you in the completion of your assignments . . . ."

3. "The products we provide are reference materials are not intended to be submitted as completed works and are to be used strictly for the purpose of assistance in writing your own assignments."[/b]

EW_writer would have people believe that the preceding quotes are from an American site. IN reality, they are from the "Terms and Conditions" page of BestTermPaper.com, one of EW_writer's employer's sites from UKRAINE.

Companies post those things about "model papers" to protect themselves. In particular, companies based in the U.S. have to make it appear that they don't allow students to submit bought papers for credit on their website because if they did not, they could be held legally accountable in several states.

Did I say that only U.S. sites post such things? No.

EW_writer:

In particular, companies based in the U.S.