| joneszr |
|
Oct 5, 08, 01:57AM
| #1 |
Joined: Sep 12, 08
Threads: 18
Posts: 83
|
Apparently this site seems to be run by a John Paulson. THe email address is
john.academichelp@googlemail.com.
Anyone has REAL experiences with this site? It seems like a FRAUD all the way.
|
|
| writerneeded |
|
Oct 6, 08, 01:37PM
| #2 |
Joined: Oct 2, 08
Posts: 18
|
Had given them a paper on Economics to write on. I am pasting the paper below:
Monetary Policy
The purpose of this study is to have a look into the factors which affect monetary policy. The study also involves bringing to light the role of a central bank in stabilizing an economy and economic indicators like unemployment, poverty, interest rates and inflation.
Role of the Phillips Curve
Phillips curve shows the inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation. (Phillips Curve), where Nairu stands for non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment. The PC, which is the long red line, changes in the long run because of the change in expectations and thus only a single rate of unemployment was consistent with the inflation rate. If the unemployment rate stays behind the red line inflationary expectations will rise, which will take the short term PC upwards as indicated by B.
Economists attribute this inverse correlation to the errors that people make while forecasting price levels. These forecasting errors of public were manipulated by the economists to generate better performance of economy. As discussed by Hall Robert below:
The benefits of inflation derive from the use of expansionary policy to trick economic agents into behaving in socially preferable ways even though their behavior is not in their own interest.... The gap between actual and expected inflation measures the extent of the trickery.... The optimal policy is not nearly as expansionary [inflationary] when expectations adjust rapidly, and most of the effect of an inflationary policy is dissipated in costly anticipated inflation. (Qtd in Rational Expectations)
Having understood the Phillips curve and the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, we will now try to find a balance between unemployment and inflation. How much is inflation inversely related to unemployment? To what extent is the trade-off existent? We will also look at the possible causes behind the inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation.
As discussed above, Phillips curve is the historical inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation. Higher the unemployment, lesser the inflation and lower the unemployment, higher the wages paid to the labor of the economy, which results in a better flow of currency within the economy, which eventually leads to inflation. American economist Irving Fisher pointed to the same kind of Phillips curve inverse relationship long back in the 1920s, whereas, Phillips' original curve described and showcased the behavior of money wages and for this reason some economists believe that the Phillips curve should be called the "Fisher curve." (Phillips Curve)
In the years after his 1958 paper, many economists in advanced industrial countries believed that Phillips' results showed a permanently and stable relationship between inflation and unemployment. One of the critical implication of this concept for government policy was that governments could control unemployment and inflation within a policy. They could tolerate a pretty reasonable rate of inflation on the higher side, as this would definitely lead to lower unemployment because there would be a trade-off between inflation and unemployment. For example, monetary policy (deficit spending) could be used to stimulate the economy, raising gross domestic product and lowering the unemployment rate. So the governments always had this choice to manipulate this pay-off and make things favourable in the economy. Consequently, this would lead to a higher inflation rate, the cost paid to have a lower unemployment rate. (Phillips Curve)
One would notice that there are several other reasons behind the fact that the unemployment rate can actually go down without much change in the interest rate scenario. Unemployment rate basically depends on many other factors like, there can be a slowdown in the rate of growth of labor supply, which can be directly responsibe for the unemployment rate to come down, if there is not a pick up in demand for labor. The unemployment rate in the UK had actually climbed up because of the fact that the labor supply in 2005-06 picked up because of inward immigration, which the country witnessed. The anomaly got corrected in late 2006 when the labor supply saw a decline. Though the present scenario is not very favorable because the workforce still remains a plenty, but given the fact that its rate of growth has fallen down, we have witnessed unemployment rates stabilizing pretty fast, however, it remains to be seen, as to how long the scenario does not change, as there is plenty of inward immigration prevalent in the economy.
Benefits and Costs of a Nominal Anchor
There can be a lot of nominal anchors which can either be price based or quantity based. A few examples of price based targets can be encompassing the Exchange Rate, Price of gold, Prices of specific commodities, or the Inflation Rate. Quantity based anchors on the other hand can be Monetary Aggregates and Nominal Income. All the anchors have their own advantages and disadvantages. Exchange rate targeting is a monetary policy under which the value of the domestic currency is fixed to that of a low inflation country like the US. This kind of pegging is desirable when a country either seeks more integration with its neighbors or does not have its own monetary policy framework. The backdrop of such a policy, however, is that the pegging country loses the use of monetary policy against any domestic shocks which might be different from that of the anchor country. Exchange rate pegs also leave countries open to domestic currency attacks and any major depreciation of the domestic currency can lead to a severe financial crisis because it might increase the country's liabilities in domestic currency. (Monetary Policy Strategy, Mishkin S Frederic)
Central Bank's concern on Financial Market Stability
The Central bank comes out with the monetary policy in order to ensure a certain key objectives like, delivering price stability with a low inflation level coupled with an objective to support the Government's economic objectives of growth and employment. Price stability is taken care of, by the Government's usual inflation target of 2%. There is a need to contemplate the crucial and critical role played by price stability in achieving the aforesaid economic stability, and in providing just the right conditions for a sustainable and longer living growth in output and employment. The official rate, which is set by the Central bank, influences many aspects of an economy such as market rates, asset prices including the house prices, expectations, and exchange rate. This gives rise to demand, which is the sum total of domestic plus external demand, which in turn gives rise to inflationary pressure resulting in inflation, another important point shown, which deserves a mention is the relationship between the exchange rate and import prices, or the price paid for imports. As explained above, the stronger the exchange rate the lesser the price paid for imports and the weaker the currency the higher the price paid for imports. (How Monetary Policy Works)
Any decision is taken after considering the condition of the whole economy and all sections of the society at large and there are several other methods to tackle the prices of properties, but it will always be better to increase the rates at a slower but steady pace, rather than giving a monetary shock. Rising Inflation, if not tackled properly and at the right time may create a cycle, wherein the inflation keeps rising due to no change in interest rates.
Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy
The Bank of England has a monetary policy and it uses the same to regulate mechanism of the economy. Like when it decides to change the interest rate, the government is trying to check the overall expenditure of the economy. A change in interest rates is mostly used to contain inflation, which is the result of lavish expenditure by the country. The bank sets a fixed interest rate at which it lends money to financial institutions and depending on this interest rate, individual banks and other financial institutions set up their own interest rates, which apply to the whole economy. This step is of indispensable importance to the economy, as this is very widely used to contain inflation. The only purpose behind such a step is just to contain undue inflationary levels prevailing in an economy. The point to be noted here is that, this interest rate set by the Bank of England is so effective and powerful that it chips in greatly to regulate the whole economy. It affects the stock and bond prices and also influences the asset prices throughout the country. This interest rate also regulated the savings in an economy, which eventually results in capital formation and reinvestment. It is note that when interest rates are high, people prefer to invest money in government deposits that are less risky in nature than the stock markets and similarly high interest rates boost up the savings. Lower interest rates make asset and real estate prices go up, as people start ignoring conventional saving instruments and make use of the high growth ventures like shares and houses, which pushes up their prices. Interest rate change also affects exchange rates, as an increase in the interest rate in UK will yield better returns to the investors compared to their overseas ventures. The diagram given below explains better
The above diagram explains the concept of system regulation. It shows that the official rate, which is set by the Bank of England, influences many parts of an economy such as market rates, asset prices including the house prices, expectations, and exchange rate. This gives rise to demand, which is the sum total of domestic plus external demand, which in turn gives rise to inflationary pressure resulting in inflation, another important point shown, which deserves a mention is the relationship between the exchange rate and import prices, or the price paid for imports. As explained above, the stronger the exchange rate the lesser the price paid for imports and the weaker the currency the higher the price paid for imports. (How Monetary Policy Works)
Activist Monetary Policy
The purpose of a Monetary Policy as explained earlier should be to promote maximum sustainable output at highest employment levels with a low inflation. Activist Monetary Policy is a policy under which the Central Bank focuses on the output fluctuations while setting their policy. This kind of policy is likely to produce worse outcomes for inflation as well as output fluctuations. This strategy can also false communication with regard to the Central Bank's strategy besides leading to an inappropriate Monetary Policy. The Central bank should focus on the long run price stability which is achievable only through maintaining a low and stable inflation, which needless to say, results in maximum economic output. Price stability is clearly the most important thing while setting up a policy and price stability is more a long run phenomenon as opposed to setting up the output fluctuations right, which is a short term concept. The more a Central bank cares about the output fluctuations the more time it will take to bring about price stability in the economy. Output fluctuation is no doubt looked into seriously as it is a very important indicator, but designing a policy keeping just the output fluctuations in mind can be disastrous.
Works Cited
"How Monetary Policy Works" bankofengland. 23 Sep.2008. Bank of England. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/how.htm
Mishkin S Frederic, "Monetary Policy Strategy" Google Book Search 23 Sep 2008 http://books.google.co.in/books?id=XZTH1rghL94C&pg=PA501&lpg=PA501&dq=nomin al+anchors+in+the+conduct+of+monetary+policy&source=web&ots=PL2VRyCx0U&sig= sXVaHKa6kst4WSsfBOvMLBl91zw&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PP A478,M1
"Output and supply" bankofengland 23 Sep.2008. Bank of England
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/inflationreport/ir07feb3.pdf
"Phillips Curve" tutor2u 23 Sep. 2008. Tutor 2 u.
http://www.tutor2u.net/economics/content/topics/inflation/philips_curve.htm
Sargent J. Thomas, "Rational Expectations" The Library Of Economics And Liberty. 23 Sep.2008 The Library Of Economics And Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/enc/RationalExpectations.html
USD 160 for this quality in 3 days is not a bad deal I would say... These guys can actually write some papers...
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Edited by: FreelanceWriter Oct 11, 08, 03:15AM
| #3 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
I don't do Economics, but purely from a writing perspective, I gotta say that's a pretty poorly written paper. The first sentence alone contains both inapprorpiate language for an academic paper ("have a look"??) as well as an obvious grammatical problem (it's "that affect," not "which affect" in that instance).
However, the bad sentence award of the day goes to this gem:
Unemployment rate basically depends on many other factors like, there can be a slowdown in the rate of growth of labor supply, which can be directly responsibe for the unemployment rate to come down, if there is not a pick up in demand for labor.
At least 7 specific problems in that sentence alone.
Honorable mention to this runner up:
"This gives rise to demand, which is the sum total of domestic plus external demand, which in turn gives rise to inflationary pressure resulting in inflation, another important point shown, which deserves a mention is the relationship between the exchange rate and import prices, or the price paid for imports."
Google isn't an appropriate academic source either, much less Google book search.
The writer has no clue when commas are (and aren't) required and most probably isn't even a native English speaker; there's not a chance in hell that was written by a Brit.
Please scan the hard copy showing the profesor's comments...probably needed to go to a second red pen.
|
|
| writerneeded |
|
Oct 11, 08, 09:46AM
| #4 |
Joined: Oct 2, 08
Posts: 18
|
I dont give a damn about... I got the piece in USD 160 and that too within 42 hours. The content was good and precise and I got 2:1...
|
|
| venus |
|
Oct 11, 08, 11:39AM
| #5 |
Joined: Oct 6, 08
Threads: 5
Posts: 45
|
writerneeded: I dont give a damn about... I got the piece in USD 160 and that too within 42 hours. The content was good and precise and I got 2:1...
You are a writing site owner, I can sense! Of which in particular?!
|
|
| venus |
|
Oct 11, 08, 11:44AM
| #6 |
Joined: Oct 6, 08
Threads: 5
Posts: 45
|
Hey, Freelance Writer! Enough of racism! Structure your argument within the framework of writing capacity regardless of race!
"The writer has no clue when commas are (and aren't) required and most probably isn't even a native English speaker; there's not a chance in hell that was written by a Brit."
And what are Brits anyway? People who cannot even write their own paper and seek out the help of writing sites without knowing that the piece of work they are jubilant about is a work of an ESL writer?
C'mon! Grow up!
A big LMAO!
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 01:02PM
| #7 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
writerneeded, you clearly own or are associated with that terrible "service." The jig was up a long time ago, crook.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Oct 11, 08, 01:06PM
| #8 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
Venus, FreelanceWriter did not mention a single word about race. Being a "Brit" has absolutely NOTHING to do with skin color or ethnic background.
FYI, "writerneeded" is NOT a customer or a Brit. He is the ESL writer who owns or is associated with that terrible "service." He is so horribly unqualified that he posted that paper (senseless drivel) in an effort to "impress," not realizing that it is total garbage.
|
|
| writerneeded |
|
Oct 11, 08, 03:15PM
| #9 |
Joined: Oct 2, 08
Posts: 18
|
I have not seen a bigger bimbo than you. Frankly, are you a "school" drop out? M sure they would have thrown you out because of your habit of messing up with people.
The paper is a total garbage? Do you know how to spell economics? Have you ever heard the term monetary policy? FYI, it is something Bernanke comes out with every year. Do you know who he is? Lol.... If you were to write a paper, you would only write the history of people whom you call crooks without any proof because you cant contemplate anything else besides that. The (so called) thing between your ears would not take it.
Only an immature person like you can rebuke a deep macro economic policy paper just because it has a few mistakes here and there.
You need treatment asap. Btw, you are quite good at provoking people but believe me everyone will soon realize that it is just another way to keep the site kicking. Employ depressed, melancholic, frustrated with life bimbos to provoke people.
I sincerely wish you good luck and a faster recovery. Good bye...
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Edited by: FreelanceWriter Oct 11, 08, 03:36PM
| #10 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
Thanks, WB.
Venus, my only point was that Brits generally have much better grammar than American native speakers. That lousy paper is written in English replete with grammatical mistakes that nobody who learned English in the UK would ever make. Last I checked, "Brits" includes individuals of all races and ethnicities, all of whom would be equally insulted by any inference that the posted paper was written by them.
|
|
| writerneeded |
|
Oct 11, 08, 03:50PM
| #11 |
Joined: Oct 2, 08
Posts: 18
|
I never meant it was in perfect language or it was written by a brit. I just said I got value for money and frankly I dont mind those small mistakes. As long as there is no blunder in grammar, m fine with it.
Nobody has time to go through a paper word by word. It is the concept which does the talking...
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Oct 11, 08, 04:14PM
| #12 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
writerneeded: The paper is a total garbage?
Yes, the paper is "a total garbage," just like your grasp of the English language.
writerneeded: As long as there is no blunder in grammar, m fine with it.
Either you haven't read the paper or you don't have even the remedial skill necessary to recognize the gluttonous amount of grammatical errors.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 11, 08, 05:46PM
| #13 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
FreelanceWriter: Please scan the hard copy showing the profesor's comments...probably needed to go to a second red pen.
ROFLMAO!!! ^__^
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 11, 08, 05:59PM
| #14 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
writerneeded: Only an immature person like you can rebuke a deep macro economic policy paper just because it has a few mistakes here and there.
While I am usually inclined to agree with anyone who puts the "immature" tag on WB, your description of your work as "a deep macro economic policy paper" is just plain preposterous. Even if we disregard all of the grammatical errors and all the lapses in proper academic word choice, it's still nothing more than a poorly stitched rag doll of a paper. There is no synthesis of ideas. You're just throwing what you got from the internet into a distasteful mix of poorly written paragraphs hoping that in all the confusion, the paper might pass as something acceptable to a grader. While that might have worked in this case based on your story, it's hardly what I'd call "deep" writing.
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Oct 11, 08, 05:59PM
| #15 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
EW_writer: Either you haven't read the paper or you don't have even the remedial skill necessary to recognize the gluttonous * amount of grammatical errors.
(^_-)
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 06:16PM
| #16 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
FreelanceWriter: (*number* of errors)
You know, when you attempt to correct ME, it will only come back to bite you in the ass.
FYI, "gluttonous AMOUNT" is perfectly correct, and I dare you to prove otherwise.
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Edited by: FreelanceWriter Oct 11, 08, 06:41PM
| #17 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
WritersBeware: You know, when you attempt to correct ME, it will only come back to bite you in the ass.FYI, "gluttonous AMOUNT" is perfectly correct, and I dare you to prove otherwise.
That said, the problem had nothing to do with gluttonous, but if you really want to be nitpicky about it, "gluttonous" does imply the taking, hoarding, or the consumption of something. A large number of grammar problems isn't really something one would characterize as "gluttony," you know?
The original comment was simply a reminder (on a thread discussing grammar) that amount only applies to things incapable of being counted individually, such as money, water, food, pride, etc. For anything capable of being counted individually, such as dollars, water bottles, hot dogs, mistakes, or good natured jokes, it's always number, not amount.
(Still) no offense intended though.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Oct 11, 08, 07:14PM
| #18 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
FreelanceWriter, I did not quote you.
Mod, there is something wrong with the quotation system. I highlighted text posted by EW_writer and clicked on the "Quote" link. The system then incorrectly inserted FreelanceWriter as the source of the quote. Can you please fix this problem?
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 07:30PM
| #19 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
FreelanceWriter: That said, the problem had nothing to do with gluttonous, but if you really want to be nitpicky about it, "gluttonous" does imply the taking, hoarding, or the consumption of something.
That is not SOLELY the case. The definition of "gluttonous" revolves around a person, place, or thing that engages in or enjoys ANY activity "to excess." The word is most commonly used in connection with the over-consumption of food/drink, but that is NOT the sole function.
FreelanceWriter: The original comment was simply a reminder (on a thread discussing grammar) that amount only applies to things incapable of being counted individually, such as money, water, food, pride, etc.
One of the definitions of "amount" is "a number." Regardless, I did not take the time to count every error; therefore, from my personal experience, the "number" of errors remained indefinite, so I could not quantify the breadth/extent of errors as a "number."
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Edited by: EW_writer Oct 11, 08, 08:49PM
| #20 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
WritersBeware: I highlighted text posted by EW_writer and clicked on the "Quote" link. The system then incorrectly inserted FreelanceWriter as the source of the quote. Can you please fix this problem?
WTF? You're not taking your meds again. >.< It was FreelanceWriter who corrected you and based on his justification, I'm inclined to agree with him. You were referring to a discreet quantity (errors) and therefore "number" rather than "amount" would be the more appropriate term to use. Your justification that the two are synonymous is simplistic and off-tangent since we're not taking about grammatical correctness here but more of writing style sophistication. Your second excuse that the number of errors is infinite also cannot fly since even if the said number is infinite which is highly doubtful to begin with, the quantity is still discreet. "Amount" is a more appropriate term for continuous quantities such as sugar or sunlight.
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Oct 11, 08, 09:03PM
| #21 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
EW_writer: One of the definitions of "amount" is "a number." Regardless, I did not take the time to count every error; therefore, from my personal experience, the "number" of errors remained indefinite, so I could not quantify the breadth/extent of errors as a "number."
Listen WB, I was not trying to embarass you by mentioning your own grammar error in a post where you were criticizing someone else's grammar. But you're now embarassing yourself by making up these convoluted excuses instead of simply accepting that you used the wrong word. MISTAKES are capable of being counted individually. It doesn't matter whether or not their exact number is actually KNOWN. Just the same as you would refer to a huge sack of copper pennies as containing a large NUMBER of coins but a large AMOUNT of copper.
Same goes with "gluttonous": it makes no more sense to refer to a "gluttonous number of mistakes" than to a "gluttonous amount of rain."
It's no big deal. Everybody makes mistakes occasionally, even you.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 09:03PM
| #22 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
EW_writer: You're not taking your meds again.
First of all, FU.
Secondly, my mistake. The "(^_-)" signature of FreelanceWriter's post made me think it was you.
Thirdly, did I type "infinite"? No. I typed "indefinite," meaning that--since I did not take the time to count--it was IMPOSSIBLE for me to determine a "number."
amount
1. the sum total of two or more quantities or sums; aggregate.
2. quantity
3. the full effect, value, or significance
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=amount
I could not personally quantify a particular number because I did not take the time to count. I used "amount" as a means to communicate my focus on the general significance and breadth of the errors. End of story.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 11, 08, 09:42PM
| #23 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
FreelanceWriter: Listen WB, I was not trying to embarass you by mentioning your own grammar error in a post where you were criticizing someone else's grammar. But you're now embarassing yourself by making up these convoluted excuses instead of simply accepting that you used the wrong word. MISTAKES are capable of being counted individually. It doesn't matter whether or not their exact number is actually KNOWN. Just the same as you would refer to a huge sack of copper pennies as containing a large NUMBER of coins but a large AMOUNT of copper. Same goes with "gluttonous": it makes no more sense to refer to a "gluttonous number of mistakes" than to a "gluttonous amount of rain." It's no big deal. Everybody makes mistakes occasionally, even you.
Why do you keep using my name when you quote the retard? >.<
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Edited by: EW_writer Oct 11, 08, 09:51PM
| #24 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
WritersBeware: First of all, FU.
Not on your life. :P
WritersBeware: Thirdly, did I type "infinite"? No. I typed "indefinite," meaning that--since I did not take the time to count--it was IMPOSSIBLE for me to determine a "number."
Well woop-dee-doo to that. :P Even if the number is indefinite, the quantity is still DISCREET. ^_^ Thus, "number" is still more appropriate. XD Sadly, your writing skills do not extend to scientific realms of the trade which is why you fail to see my point. >.<
WritersBeware: I could not personally quantify a particular number because I did not take the time to count. I used "amount" as a means to communicate my focus on the general significance and breadth of the errors. End of story.
This is crap and everyone can see the amount of b*llsh*t you're making with the number of times you keep defending yourself. So there. :D
Haha!
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 09:52PM
| #25 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
FreelanceWriter: I was not trying to embarass you
You didn't.
FreelanceWriter: a post where
a post in which
FreelanceWriter: grammar error
grammatical error OR error in grammar
Unless we (qualified writers) want to take the time to closely scrutinize every word of every one of our posts before clicking that "Post Message" button, it's best not to nitpick. Frauds are those whose final, paid product contains embarrassing errors--and they don't even recognize it! Those people deserve to be nitpicked simply to make them recognize that they are ripping-off customers.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 09:58PM
| #26 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
Your constant name-calling serves only to highlight your immaturity and lower standing.
EW_writer: Sadly, your writing skills do not extend to scientific realms of the trade which is why you fail to see my point.
Nice try. This discussion has absolutely NOTHING to do with "science."
EW_writer: This is crap and everyone can see the amount of b*llsh*t you're making with the number of times you keep defending yourself.
Ah, so now you're disagreeing with dictionary.com?
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 11, 08, 10:11PM
| #27 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
I'm not calling you names, you are a retard. :P
Did dictionary.com use the word the same way you used it? :P
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Oct 11, 08, 10:11PM
| #28 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
OK, but you still owe all of us that portion of our lives back that we wasted ever since you couldn't just type the words "Oops...my bad...number of errors...LOL" after a friendly attempt at humor.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 11:12PM
| #29 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
FreelanceWriter: OK, but you still owe all of us that portion of our lives back that we wasted ever since you couldn't just type the words "Oops...my bad...number of errors...LOL" after a friendly attempt at humor.
There was no "error," and I proved it.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 11, 08, 11:13PM
| #30 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
EW_writer: I'm not calling you names, you are a retard.
I'm not going to humor you any more. I'll stick to adult conversations.
|
|
| venus |
|
Oct 12, 08, 10:43AM
| #31 |
Joined: Oct 6, 08
Threads: 5
Posts: 45
|
Ei, Writers Beware and EW_Writer, may I remind you that this thread is for discussions about scams and beng scammed only. Enough of senseless, silly arguments that relate not to these. Let's step up to sensibility.
Cheers!
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 12, 08, 02:26PM
| #32 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
OK, Mr. 15 posts.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 13, 08, 01:30AM
| #33 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
WritersBeware: I'm not going to humor you any more. I'll stick to adult conversations.
:p
LOL... I just love kicking your ass. ^_^
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 13, 08, 01:45AM
| #34 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
EW_writer: I just love kicking your ass.
Too bad it's never happened.
Keep scraping by on that dirty money from EssayWriters.net.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 13, 08, 02:19AM
| #35 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
WritersBeware: Too bad it's never happened.
Tsk tsk... you really should do something about that deteriorating memory. :D
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 13, 08, 02:47AM
| #36 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
Please, remind me. Please direct everyone to this purported "ass kicking." LOL!
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Oct 13, 08, 09:25PM
| #37 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171
|
Sigh.. there we go again. ^_^ Everyone here knows very well how often I kick your sorry ass. No links are necessary, they just need to click on the threads where we've clashed to remember.
Say, I just had an interesting thought...
Oh Lavinia, what can you say about WB's side on our little writing style argument here?
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Oct 13, 08, 09:28PM
| #38 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
EW_writer: Sigh.. there we go again. ^_^ Everyone here knows very well how often I kick your sorry ass. No links are necessary, they just need to click on the threads where we've clashed to remember.
Coward.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Oct 13, 08, 09:37PM
| #39 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,389
|
EW_writer: writing style argument here
Is THAT what you consider an "ass kicking"? LMAO! You're PATHETIC. I already proved that MY use of wording was perfectly valid because of MY personal circumstance. I know--it's beyond your comprehension boundary. I then went on to prove that the person who "jokingly" attempted to correct me typed two, ACTUAL errors!
|
|
| FreelanceWriter |
Writer |
Edited by: FreelanceWriter Oct 13, 08, 11:15PM
| #40 |
Joined: Oct 8, 08
Threads: 3
Posts: 599
|
WritersBewar: I then went on to prove that the person who "jokingly" attempted to correct me typed two, ACTUAL errors!
WritersBewar: I already proved that MY use of wording was perfectly valid because of MY personal circumstance
The only things you "proved" are: (1) you're an exremely pompous and insecure person who takes offense that anybody would even "dare" to suggest that maybe you're not quite the grammarian you think you are, and (2) there are absolutely no limits to the silliness of the self-justifying arguments you will pull outta your ass to avoid admitting you're totally wrong even when it's completely obvious to any objective person that you are.
Those are your "personal circumstances."
|
|
