Please quote anything that I have typed in this forum that you claim is a lie so that I can further prove to everyone the extent of your lies and fabrications.

^______^ (too busy to engage but just couldn't help responding :p)

Hahaha Ew_writer and your post is appreciated =D. WritersBeware is still getting paid and will lose her salary if she doesn't defend essay town or essay fraud with great care. Hmm i wonder what amount is she being paid :/ or may she herself is the owner of EssayTown woah that makes her a millionaire. Ermm Can i friendshyp you WritersBeware *blinks* lol. Sigh just go on and on WritersBeware but i am still wondering as to why the topic about the defaming suit against EssayTown was deleted. Hmm *rolls eyes*

You are a world-class moron. I already addressed your imbecilic ramblings and false accusations.

I suggest that you improve your English skills.

do you mean this link

http://www.axact.com/truth/

and this one

The Federal District Courts Dockets REVEAL:
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-njdce/case_no-3:2007cv05491/case_id- 208337


AXACT (PVT.), LTD. v. STUDENT NETWORK RESOURCES, INC. et al
Case Number: 3:2007cv05491

Hey, strugglingstudent, you're BEGGING to get sued. Neither of those pages even mention essaytown.

This is weird, funny but weird. So, who is Axact? Which companies do they own? What defamation of them is occuring? Axact is clearly based in Pakistan, so if they own companies that claim to be based in the U.S., and are claiming that pointing out their lie is defamation, then that is really funny, in a very sad way.

P.S. Nothing in those documents talk about essayscam or essaytown. So folks are posting them on this forum why?

I already pointed our that fact numerous times, but do they care? No. Their goal is to defame by any and all means possible, not to relay truthful information.

The answer to your questions is simple: they are desperate crooks who seize upon even the most remotely related or completely unrelated information in an attempt to manipulate facts and intentionally distort reality with the goal of smearing the reputation of basically any organization or company that stands for honest business practices, including essayscam.org, essayfraud.org, and--their favorite target--essaytown.com.

Strugglingstudent, in particular, really needs to watch her step. Indeed, she has already admitted her place of employment and her role therein. Any attorney can easily obtain the necessary information to prosecute her.

Oh yes i'd definitely contact you for tuitions you fool lol. Anyways i am not interested in a 50 year old lady ^o).

Hmm...Lavinia i don't know i didn't bother to read the whole stuff. What i really found fishy was the way the topic was deleted =S i mean within seconds ? in a jiffy. Like in 15 minutes MAX ? :S i mean i have seen previous topics getting deleted but i don't know there is something more to it i bet. This 50 year old lady is upto something and i bet she is a billionnaire already. Hmm call her the new Bill Gates lol.





Ahh and yeah Ms/Mr/Mrs (whatever it is) WritersBeware i'd love getting sued =D lol idiot..

And besides i have other things to do then to write proper english OVER HERE =p lol you fool now dont give me your crappy rules and regulations :p lol does anybody here wonder as to how has she read all the rules over here hrmm *rolls eyes* fishy...i bet no one else has done that.. Now i bet she d say "ESSAY SCAM DOES NOT ALLOW CRAPPY ENGLISH, THEREFORE YOU SHOULD AVOID IT OR YOU'D BE SUED". Ahh well thank you =p ta ta till den ;)

Oh that is so funny lol

I think you will find (as Lavinia pointed out in some long ago post) that it is impossible to sue someone who posts on a forum as the person cannot be identified by the username.

To say they could chase me at work is also laughable lol What are they going to say to me lol ' we have reason to believe that you go on essayscam as strugglingstudent' lol and my response in the words of WB is 'where's your proof?' lol

Thanks for giving me a laugh with your outrageous suggestion. Oh and by the way if you could read the whole court transcript (which costs $0.08 per page) you would find that the 2 companies mentioned are cited in the full text. The second link I posted takes you to the court hearing etc but does not contain the 2 specific companies in the header of the case as the suit was brought against STUDENT NETWORK RESOURCES, INC. et al with these 2 companies being part of the et al.

WOW! You are ignorant. You can be tracked to the very chair from which you have submitted your libelous garbage. A subpoena--delivered to all necessary parties along the chain of your contacts--can and will garner the appropriate evidence and tracking information. You can believe whatever you like, but you are CLEARLY not the one with a tech background.

If you'd pull your head out of your a** and stop intentionally skewing the truth, you would acknowledge that STUDENT NETWORK RESOURCES won the case in decisive fashion because it was a completely fabricated and bullsh*t complaint. The plaintiff's own attorneys DUMPED the plaintiff--and the judge withdrew the case (against the Plaintiff's will)--because the defendant's initial evidence delivered to the plaintiff's attorneys was so devastating. The Plaintiff's attorneys even wrote a letter to the judge in which they stated, in so many words, that the Plaintiff lied to them and withheld crucial evidence that--if known prior to filing the frivolous complaint--would have led their law firm to refuse to file the frivolous suit in the first place! What--did you miss that part?


A. If you could read at all, you would have noted that I already stated that I have read the original complaint--and all other documents on the docket--from top to bottom.

B. I) Essayscam.org is not mentioned at all. II) Essayfraud.org was the focus of the suit, and it proved every accusation to be not only false, but intentionally fabricated. III) The irresponsible plaintiff from Pakistan fooled his attorney into listing Essaytown.com and 3 other completely unrelated, innocent companies as being "owned by Essayfraud.org" apparently because those 4 companies posted EssayFraud.org logos on their sites.

Educate yourself.

Sorry, but I don't speak Neanderthalian.

And I know that to be absolute nonsense. If this were true then we would not encounter the difficulties we do in tracing the authors of child pornography and e-crime. Wake up and smell the roses. There are people out there with sophisticated programs that can provide spoof IP addresses and with the advancement of wireless technology, internet cafes and wifi hotspots our job is becoming even more difficult. You only have to look at the rapid increase in computer related crime to realise that the policing of the internet is becoming untenable.



Just where have you supposedly stated that you have read ALL the documents. In this thread you stated that the 2 pages mentioned did not name essayfraud you did not state that you had read the whole transcript. You tried to state that essayfraud was not mentioned in the link I gave but have now back peddled and admitted that they were.

Oh and as for your claim that I am defaming essayfraud by posting the link I was merely directing posters back to the original link so they could decide for themselves what they believe. The link can easily be accessed by a google search and therefore is in the public domain. I DID NOT at any point say what the outcome of the case was but that the links posted had contained allegations against essayfraud (a fact you do not deny).

If, as you say, this action was binned, why were the moderators on here so quick to delete the link. Surely they would welcome posters accessing the link, paying the fee and reading the full judgment as this would prove that the claim had been brought vexatiously, if what you say is indeed the case.

I'm not referring to others. I'm referring to YOU. For example, have YOU used "sophisticated programs that can provide spoof IP addresses" for every one of your 164 posts here? I highly doubt it.


Got glasses?

http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/12_578_0.html#msg7874


I suggest that you brush up on your debating skills because you are resorting to flat-out lies. Please quote for me precisely where I stated that ESSAYFRAUD is not named in the suit. What I have opposed is lostsaad's ignorant and intentionally false claim--with your support--that essaytown was a named party. That is blatantly false, and if you don't acknowledge such--having admittedly read all of the documents and rulings--then you are guilty of defamation.


Nice try. You clearly suggested, via your intentional quote of lostsaad, that Essaytown is a named party and defendant in the suit. That's defamation. Your track record of attacks will communicate to any judge that your defamation is no accident.


I find it funny that you fraud supporters vilify me and make false accusations against me, simply because I point out all of your lies.

Actually yes I do :) My son (who is a computer technician) has installed such programs on all the computers in the house as (according to him) it makes it more difficult for hackers to compromise your computers security if you are using a spoof IP address. I think that is what they call a home goal lol



Nope I don't think you will find I did. Lostsaad was asking about the deleted post. The link I referred him to was the link listed by the originator of the allegation that Essaytown and Essayfraud were in collusion. As mentioned above anyone could find the link by a google search. In the search engine all I put was essayfrand and essaytown and defamation and the link was given. Are you suggesting that google should be sued for allowing the link to remain. lol

In an intentional and calculated fashion, you introduced your reference to the frivolous and defeated suit by including the following quote:

That's defamation.


You're a bold-faced liar. The Justia page that you maliciously referenced in wrongful association with essaytown does not appear for the keywords you claim:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=essayfraud+and+essaytown+and+ defamation&btnG=Search

Why do you insist on lying at every turn? What is your obvious, vested interest in defaming essayfraud and essaytown (two entities that have NEVER been proven to have engaged in ANY wrong-doing or fraudulent activity)? Why do you constantly attack legitimate entities but not type a word against the dozens of sites that are VERIFIABLY FRAUDULENT?

My advice to you would be to cease your defamation campaign.

Nope I'm not lying I typed in essayfraud and essaytown and defamation and got this link

http://writing-world.blogspot.com/2007/10/essayfraudorg-promotes-buying-ess ays-at.html

from there you scroll down and you find the justitia link

it's not rocket science.

As for defaming it was lostsaad that said the post naming essaytown had been deleted. the link I put in was the same link given in the original post I DID NOT SAY COMMENT ON WHETHER THE ALLEGATION WAS TRUE OR NOT I MERELY REPRODUCED THE LINK AS FOUND IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED ABOVE - no go eat your own words as I have proven how I found the link.

You intentionally neglect to explain why you purposely--and without solicitation--introduced your link to the Justia listing with lostsaad's defamatory claim that essaytown was a named party. ADMITTEDLY, you had already read every page of the documents, which clearly prove all of the accusations from both lostsaad and the plaintiff to be 100% false and defamatory. Therefore, your willing attempt to perpetuate and further lostsaad's defamation is irrefutable. (Your willingness to defame is also clear from your admitted inclusion of "essaytown" in your keyword search.)

The defendant's willingness to defame is a crucial aspect of any ruling for monetary damages in a defamation suit. Again, I suggest that you publicly retract your defamation before you become more involved than you would like.

Yawn here we go again back to threatening me with some supposed defamation suit lol

Lostsaad could have found the link for himself in the same way that I did. All I provided was the link to save him the effort.

How do you intend to pursue me for defamation? such a claim can only be brought by the person harmed by the defamation (if there really is any such defamation) so unless you are claiming to be the owner of Essaytown then you really do not have a leg to stand on.

I suggest you do some research on the law of defamation given that I am not the author of the justitia link or the axact link. I am just an interested observer who gets a kick out of pushing your buttons lol