| WritersBeware |
|
May 15, 11, 11:26AM
| #81 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
If I were to list all of the legit companies in the industry, would that mean that I "work for" all of them, too?
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 11:41AM
| #82 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
I'm not here to answer your "hypothetical" questions or argue with you, unless you can put your cards on the table first. you're lying about not working for ET. you're lying because you know that admitting it would seriously torpedo your credibility as an objective third-party "scam buster." what you may not know is that you're just building sand castles... your childish tantrums, ignorance of empirical research skills, and misplaced vulgarity have already destroyed your credibility.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 15, 11, 11:44AM
| #83 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: your childish tantrums, ignorance of empirical research skills, and misplaced vulgarity have already destroyed your credibility.
There are far more open appeals for assistance from WB and I than there are for you. In fact, I can't recall a single person posting to ask your specific advice about a company, how to go about finding a decent company, or anything else. If you're going to harp on empirical research skills, you should try engaging in some empirical research: from what can be objectively verified, WB and I both have far more credibility than you with others who come to this forum.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
May 15, 11, 12:12PM
| #84 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
editor75: your childish tantrums, ignorance of empirical research skills, and misplaced vulgarity have already destroyed your credibility
Um, that's all you, buddy. Again, if you'd like to debate me on the issues, let's do it. If not, just STFU, loser.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 03:00PM
| #85 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
WB: again, I don't debate cowards who won't lay their cards on the table. if you'd care to come clean, we can have a discussion. it might be fun-- maybe you'll try to cinch another argument using urbandictionary.com; maybe you'll use wikipedia this time. in any case, it's not going to happen unless you admit what most (including your new toady pheelyks) here already know: you work for ET.
WritersBeware: just STFU, loser.
it's nothing to throw a tantrum about. aren't you proud of your job? haha.
pheelyks: There are far more open appeals for assistance from WB and I than there are for you
going by your number of posts, that's totally possible. but I wouldn't want to call the average customer in this industry a very good judge of my empiricism... would you?
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware May 15, 11, 03:51PM
| #86 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
editor75: WB: again, I don't debate cowards who won't lay their cards on the table. if you'd care to come clean, we can have a discussion.
Fu*k you, c***sucker. Stop wasting forum space with your useless, cowardly posts. Here are the facts:
1. You have copied an ignorant accusation from previous morons, each of whom failed miserably in proving that accusation
2. I have directly challenged you to prove the accusation. You refuse to do so because you are a little b*tch who's not man enough or smart enough to back-up his claims.
3. I do not work for ET. If you want to continue your propaganda campaign by claiming otherwise, you should at least have the guts to state why it is—EXACTLY—that you have come to that ignorant position. Why is that so difficult for you?
In summary, you are an insignificant, petty being that can't prove its accusations
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Edited by: editor75 May 15, 11, 04:00PM
| #87 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
WritersBeware: who's not man enough
au contraire, mon frere.
WritersBeware: I do not work for ET.
the truth will set you free.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
May 15, 11, 04:07PM
| #88 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
That's what I thought, fairy.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 15, 11, 04:15PM
| #89 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: but I wouldn't want to call the average customer in this industry a very good judge of my empiricism... would you?
You missed the point entirely. You stated that WB's credibility has been eradicated by her posts. I pointed out that many people still find her (and me) to be very credible sources of information, while the same cannot be said for you. Your empirical abilities suck because you make statements that are clearly refuted by empirical facts.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 04:26PM
| #90 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
very ladylike...
pheelyks: Your empirical abilities suck because you make statements that are clearly refuted by empirical facts.
fact: WB works for ET. care to refute?
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 15, 11, 05:06PM
| #91 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: fact: WB works for ET. care to refute?
I have never seen anyone post any evidence supporting this assertion. I understand the inference, but this is specifically NOT an empirical fact because it is NOT something that can be demonstrated through direct observation--unless you're aware of something I'm not. And to pre-empt, please do not tell me it's up to me to "prove" that WB doesn't work for ET--that's called proving a negative and it's logically impossible We've been over this before.
You're also ignoring the fact that your previous assertion is plain wrong--I know you think that you "win" arguments by changing the subject whenever you can't even pretend to proceed in a logical manner anymore, but that really isn't the way it works for most people.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 05:11PM
| #92 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
I don't position myself in this forum as any sort of provider of services. I was politely ignoring your point (at least you didn't accuse me of not reading it), but if you're going to call me on it, I'm going to call it what it is... moot.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware May 15, 11, 05:14PM
| #93 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
pheelyks: please do not tell me it's up to me to "prove" that WB doesn't work for ET--that's called proving a negative and it's logically impossible
Can you grasp the concept now, editor75 (aka, "Mr. Clueless")?
editor75: I don't position myself in this forum as any sort of provider of services.
You have now proven yourself to be both an idiot AND a liar. The main reason why you joined this forum was to put forth some incredibly naive, unrealistic "ideas" for business owners. Obviously, you are—or at least believe that you are—a service provider. I'm not at all surprised that you can't find steady, high-paying work with one of the reputable companies in the industry. Cry me a river.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
Edited by: pheelyks May 15, 11, 05:17PM
| #94 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: I don't position myself in this forum as any sort of provider of services
You do present yourself as a voice of "reason" capable of making objective judgments about others, and claiming that others are not trusted while implying that yourself are. The facts prove you wrong. You might think the fact that your arguments make no sense and aren't based in reality is moot, but I think it's pretty relevant.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 05:30PM
| #95 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
pheelyks: The facts prove you wrong.
well, thanks for chiming in again, pheelyks. here's fact #1-- I wasn't addressing you.
fact #2 (absolutely!)-- WB works for ET.
ergo, fact #3-- WB is a liar.
how's that logic? I don't see where your dog is in this fight, unless you're recognizing WB as your colleague, in which case, the dog would be you-- WB's lap-dog.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware May 15, 11, 05:36PM
| #96 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
editor75: fact #2 (absolutely!)-- WB works for ET.
editor75: ergo, fact #3-- WB is a liar.
Moderator, this has gone on long enough. I have openly challenged this cretin to prove his accusation. He refuses to do so, yet continues to state as fact what is obviously his lame, propagandistic fascination. There's no sense in me or anyone else attempting to rationally debate with this nutjob. Therefore, I request that you take whatever action necessary to prevent him from posting the propaganda any longer. His comments have no basis in reality, serving only to poison the forum and mislead people who come here seeking reliable, truthful, verifiable information about essay scams, which I have provided since April of 2007.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 15, 11, 05:59PM
| #97 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
the mod isn't going to help you, WB. try telling the truth.
WritersBeware: people who come here seeking reliable, truthful, verifiable information about essay scams
they find the biased, subjective, half-crazy, and often racist assumptions of an ET propagandist.
shame on you.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
May 15, 11, 06:16PM
| #98 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
WritersBeware: Moderator, this has gone on long enough. I have openly challenged this cretin to prove his accusation. He refuses to do so, yet continues to state as fact what is obviously his lame, propagandistic fascination. There's no sense in me or anyone else attempting to rationally debate with this nutjob. Therefore, I request that you take whatever action necessary to prevent him from posting the propaganda any longer. His comments have no basis in reality, serving only to poison the forum and mislead people who come here seeking reliable, truthful, verifiable information about essay scams, which I have provided since April of 2007. |
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 15, 11, 06:19PM
| #99 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: I don't see where your dog is in this fight
Some of us just like things to make sense. like when you call assertions that have no empirical evidence "facts," it bugs me.
You've made it clear you can't hold up in a real argument, based on actual facts and adhering to the basic rules of logic and rationality. That makes continuing rather pointless.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Edited by: editor75 May 15, 11, 06:23PM
| #100 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
pheelyks: That makes continuing rather pointless.
don't let the door hit you on the way out.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 15, 11, 06:27PM
| #101 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: don't let the door hit you on the way out
How incredibly apropos
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 16, 11, 11:36AM
| #102 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
kel merde, comme de coutoume.
|
|
| MeoKhan |
Writer |
May 16, 11, 12:09PM
| #103 |
Joined: Jan 9, 11
Threads: 4
Posts: 1,118
|
Droit!
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 16, 11, 01:13PM
| #104 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: kel merde, comme de coutoume.
Spelled incorrectly and useless. How surprising.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 16, 11, 04:00PM
| #105 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
Lache-moi la grappe.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 16, 11, 04:06PM
| #106 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: Lache-moi la grappe.
Incorrectly used. I don't speak French either, but at least I don't pretend....
|
|
| editor75 |
|
May 16, 11, 04:30PM
| #107 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
pour vous, merde d'or.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
May 16, 11, 04:40PM
| #108 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
editor75: pour vous, merde d'or.
Frère Jacques, frère Jacques,
Dormez-vous? Dormez-vous?
|
|
| TREETOPS |
|
Edited by: TREETOPS May 17, 11, 12:53PM
| #109 |
Joined: May 17, 11
Threads: 4
Posts: 28
|
insults over what?
|
|
