| yusuf |
|
Edited by: yusuf Sep 21, 10, 06:03AM
| #1 |
Joined: Sep 21, 10
Threads: 1
Posts: 2
|
I have registered with a company by the name of freelancercareers.com which seems to be promising, well i dont believe so. previously i had registered with essaywritters.com, which most people believe is a scam, i forgot my password and reported, surprisingly the new login and password was sent from freelancercareers.com? I am confused; is this another associate of essaywritters.com. somebody advise.
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Sep 21, 10, 07:10AM
| #2 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
Yes - it is.
|
|
| yusuf |
|
Sep 21, 10, 08:01AM
| #3 |
Joined: Sep 21, 10
Threads: 1
Posts: 2
|
@WRT,
have you ever worked with them? just how is this a scam, do they provide good work to the buyer or dont they pay thier writters? just advise.
|
|
| mbanciu |
|
Nov 7, 10, 03:08PM
| #4 |
Joined: Nov 7, 10
Posts: 1
|
Hi,
I have registered with freelancercareers.com a month ago and I did get the first payment for the first payroll of october.
There are always orders on the panel and so far, I really am satisfied with them. I also received bonuses for satisfaction survey completed by clients.
It does seem promising.
YUSUF, how are things for you so far?
I'll keep you updated.
Bye.
|
|
| jwolfe2 |
|
Nov 7, 10, 03:47PM
| #5 |
Joined: Jan 22, 10
Threads: 7
Posts: 79
|
mbanciu: I have registered with freelancercareers.com a month ago and I did get the first payment for the first payroll of october.
^ he's talking about working for $3 per page at essaywriters
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Nov 7, 10, 03:54PM
| #6 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
You've got to admit that they overpaid :)
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Nov 7, 10, 03:58PM
| #7 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
WRT: You've got to admit that they overpaid :)
Indeed . . . .
mbanciu: I have registered with freelancercareers.com a month ago
You have the ability to simultaneously exist in both the present and past?
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Nov 8, 10, 12:43AM
| #8 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
WritersBeware: You have the ability to simultaneously exist in both the present and past?
As we are living in a world where this character actually found work as a writer, anything is possible.
Welcome to the TWILIGHT ZONE ...
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Nov 8, 10, 12:50AM
| #9 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,678
|
WRT: Welcome to the TWILIGHT ZONE ...
Speaking of sci-fi, did you hear that "Being Human" is getting a US version on Syfy Channel?
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Nov 8, 10, 01:17AM
| #10 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
Really?! I must admit to liking your versions more :)
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Nov 18, 10, 09:55PM
| #11 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
My (simple) question about freelancercareers.com is in two parts: (a) do they really pay? (b) do they pay on a timely basis?
NB: If you do not understand the essence of the question, do not waste your (precious) time replying to my post. To clarify, I am not interested in knowing how much they pay; I already know that.
|
|
| oxipital |
|
Dec 4, 10, 11:30PM
| #12 |
Joined: Dec 4, 10
Posts: 3
|
Merged topic:
Freelancercareers.com
Does anyone have any information on the company? Do they pay according to their schedule? I realize their payoff isn't that high, which is fine. But, I've already written six papers for them and I'd like to make sure I'm not pissing in a hole here.
Thanks kindly.
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Edited by: rwaimba2 Dec 6, 10, 02:16AM
| #13 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
@oxipital what I can confirm is that the company (if it is a company) does not pay its writers (I have proof if you want one).If you refer to my previous post, you will see I was also asking the same question as you are. Please do not work for them. I know they have a large supply of orders, but I guess it is because they swindle their writers out of their earnings. I have worked for them and got very positive feedback from customers (I also have proof of this), but when it came to the time to honour their part of the contract, they just started playing PR stunts (need I say I have proof?). The organization is a.k.a essaywriters.net=writers.ph. Their support calls from two locations, kent and Newcastle; both in Wilimngton,DE.
|
|
| oxipital |
|
Dec 9, 10, 10:59AM
| #14 |
Joined: Dec 4, 10
Posts: 3
|
I'd like to see that proof if possible, thank you kindly.
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Dec 11, 10, 04:24AM
| #15 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
oxipital: I'd like to see that proof
Just PM me, I will let you in on where you can access this after I anonymize it. I cannot possibly post it here, the site does not seem (to me) as being impartial. I would be dumb to expect it to handle any evidence presented without a possibility of distortion.
|
|
| AmonsEssays |
|
Dec 11, 10, 05:43AM
| #16 |
Joined: Dec 8, 10
Threads: 2
Posts: 201
|
Just PM me, I will let you in on where you can access this after I anonymize it. I cannot possibly post it here, the site does not seem (to me) as being impartial. I would be dumb to expect it to handle any evidence presented without a possibility of distortion.
No disrespect, but that's silly. Yes, not everyone is objective anywhere. But if you HAVE the evidence, how can it be DISTORTED? The evidence would kept, untampered with, and any distortions could be dealt with. This seems to be special pleading...
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Dec 11, 10, 08:29AM
| #17 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
Evidence cannot be tampered with, just as Amons has correctly pointed out. Post screen shots and blacken out your name, if you want. The site mods will hardly waste their precious time photoshopping and distorting your 'evidence.'
|
|
| AmonsEssays |
|
Edited by: AmonsEssays Dec 11, 10, 01:32PM
| #18 |
Joined: Dec 8, 10
Threads: 2
Posts: 201
|
Especially since he has a copy on his side in the first place, so that means he can easily repost it if it got photoshopped. That would instantly discredit this entire site. No one else here is afraid of posting long e-mail interactions, and I don't think there's evidence ANY have been tampered with.
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Edited by: WRT Dec 11, 10, 03:22PM
| #19 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
That's exactly the point. If people are so suspicious of this forum and believe the administrators involved in some kind of grand conspiracy to silence them, why do they come here?
As Amons pointed out, there is no evidence to suggest that the mods tamper with posts so why would they 'distort' whatever 'evidence' you post?
Many here know that certain sites are less than honest. That, however, does not mean that any claims made against these sites will be accepted without question. If you say you have 'evidence,' show it. If you don't, then move along ...
|
|
| AmonsEssays |
|
Dec 11, 10, 07:01PM
| #20 |
Joined: Dec 8, 10
Threads: 2
Posts: 201
|
And if they DO come here, while thinking this place is unremittingly hostile to them, wouldn't they have an interest in DISCREDITING this place? Post the material to a blog too. If it gets changed here, you have incontrovertible proof that the people here are dishonest. There are numerous ways of sharing evidence that aren't some kind of backroom PM.
Of course, it does seem this is another tendril of the EW.net machine, but hey. Was still a silly argument ;)
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Dec 12, 10, 07:26PM
| #21 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
If, AmonsEssays: how can it be DISTORTED?
was a genuine question, then why would you suggest this.
AmonsEssays: any distortions could be dealt with.
From this, it is hard to tell who will deal with the distortions (if there were to be any) unless you meant this:
AmonsEssays: so that means he can easily repost it if it got photoshopped
or this:
AmonsEssays: Post the material to a blog too
In that case, the posting here would defeat its initial purpose.
WRT: The site mods will hardly waste their precious time photoshopping and distorting your 'evidence.'
Probably you know them better; I don't.
AmonsEssays: some kind of backroom PM.
Does this mean that a PM is ineffective? If so, what would be the purpose of having it on the site? I guess sharing could easily qualify.
AmonsEssays: wouldn't they have an interest in DISCREDITING this place?
Probably, but in this case, the deduction is wrong.
For instance, wouldn't they also have a reason to trend carefully?
WRT: If you don't,then move along ...
This is a wrong conclusion, but still, there could be a valuable advice in the second part. I will consider it.
Accordingly, if it is impossible for Oxipital to get his or her answer via my suggested method, s/he can continue working for them. That way s/he will be ABSOLUTELY sure if they pay or not.
|
|
| AmonsEssays |
|
Dec 12, 10, 09:43PM
| #22 |
Joined: Dec 8, 10
Threads: 2
Posts: 201
|
rwaimba2: In that case, the posting here would defeat its initial purpose.
Ummmmmmmm... HOW, exactly?
You would post information.
The information would be tampered with.
You would then prove that the information WAS tampered with by virtue of having your own version of the data.
You would not only have proven your original point, but ALSO proven that this site was hostile and dishonest. You would have destroyed years of amassed credibility at once. That's better, from some people's perspective (certainly from the perspective of someone who alleges dishonesty or hostility here), than just posting the original evidence.
By your reasoning, it would be redundant to post the same article on the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The blog post would also get you more exposure for your evidence.
This is so transparent and obvious, I wonder why there's so much prevarication...
As for treading carefully: Again, WHY? This site can discredit them, posted information or otherwise. At least with posting here, you can counter that issue. And that's still immaterial to the fact that, if you have evidence that you have a copy of, you need not be afraid of tampering.
As for PMs: If you have a problem with a company, it should be out in the open, given that that's the point of the site... PMs are for different things.
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Edited by: rwaimba2 Dec 13, 10, 04:26AM
| #23 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
AmonsEssays: By your reasoning, it would be redundant to post the same article on the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.
Wrong. I fail to understand how you (although I have read about your practice to delete names of persons to whom you are responding/quoting, I feel by using the active I do not come out as "personalizing" arguments) draw such a conclusion.
From various threads here, let me give you an example, (http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/12/essayscam-org-essayfraud-orgs-purpose-19 7/) hardly can one establish the credibility of the site. I have not found any reason to accuse the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal of lacking credibility. I premise my arguments, you fail to identify how my premise is based on false logic or my conclusion a wrong deduction.
AmonsEssays: I wonder why there's so much prevarication...
I wonder which truth I am avoiding here. I guess you could be familiar with some saying to the effect that a lie told over and over, could sometimes become a truth, off course, depending on the recipient. So your version of truth may not be so apparent to me.
Finally, I could post some information I have watered down here. But as I have noted, I have removed various aspects that may affect whether this is evidence or "evidence." To clarify my earlier point, I will never, for instance, post detailed information here that includes order IDs, topics covered, payment values, or any other information that has the potential to reveal, for instance, the customer's identity. I have provided the reason for not doing so, if you care to read between the lines. But here's is some where I have removed substantial information.
Code Topic Additional files Uploaded documents Payment status
- -----------------
2 view
November 17 2010 22:32 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -------------------
4 view
2 view
November 20 2010 3:50 Order is sent to customer not paid
- --------------------
5 view
2 view
November 22 2010 19:17 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -----------------------
4 view
2 view
November 12 2010 13:27 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -----------------------
1 view
November 11 2010 14:41 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ------------------------
1 view
October 29 2010 21:10 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ------------------------
1 view
November 2 2010 15:22 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ------------------------
2 view
2 view
November 4 2010 22:21 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ------------------------
5 view
3 view
October 23 2010 19:00 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -------------------------
1 view
1 view
October 23 2010 10:05 Order is sent to customer not paid
- --------------------------
1 view
October 26 2010 3:44 Order is sent to customer not paid
- --------------------------
4 view
3 view
October 19 2010 10:14 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ---------------------------
4 view
2 view
October 16 2010 20:15 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ---------------------------
1 view
October 1 2010 7:39 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -----------------------------
4 view
1 view
September 19 2010 17:39 Order is sent to customer not paid
- -----------------------------
4 view
1 view
September 7 2010 14:05 Order is sent to customer not paid
- ------------------------------
2 view
September 3 2010 16:42 Order is sent to customer not paid
Ok, and when I said I have received positive feedback from customers, I can exemplify this (I have similarly deleted the name appended to the sign off)
Dear Writer!
You have been given a bonus for "Very satisfied" survey submitted by the customer to the order you completed.
Thank you for your efforts!
Keep up a good job!
Best regards,
Need I say, neither have I received the principal amount nor the bonus for clarity sake?
|
|
| rwaimba2 |
|
Edited by: rwaimba2 Dec 13, 10, 04:56AM
| #24 |
Joined: Nov 18, 10
Posts: 22
|
Found out that the link I posted is not working, but here it is essayscam.org and essayfraud.org's purpose (?)
and in case it does not work, the title was essayscam.org and essayfraud.org's purpose. This could be "old", and perhaps old references have been surpassed by subsequent events. But here is another Official reason from the moderator for enabling abuse and libel
Basically, hardly any thread here goes to completion without the subject matter being lost in the course of "arguments."
|
|
| WRT |
Company Representative |
Edited by: WRT Dec 13, 10, 11:17AM
| #25 |
Joined: Sep 29, 09
Threads: 14
Posts: 1,850
|
It is more than apparent that you failed to grasp the subject matter. The thread you referenced was about a very specific case of libel, involving a known individual - an individual who employed various usernames to attack and libel all industry competitors.
The mods kept the thread (as they did with others) in their untampered form for legal purposes. These threads proved invaluable evidence against the individual in question. Although she no longer operates in this industry (her sites were taken offline), she comes here from time to time to attack one and all.
Now - how is that even relevant to the argument you're trying to make against this forum.
We, as a company, have been attacked on this forum - we responded, the mods never tampered with the evidence posted and we never felt the need to add our names to the DND list.
We - as in the majority here - may know (for a fact) that Yuri is less than honest with his writers. He underpays and provides customers with substandard work. That does not mean that we would simply jump at any opportunity to attack EW - you've made a claim against them but have phrased it in an extremely obscure manner.
How much do they owe you?
Have they given you a reason for non-payment?
If your academic writing and arguments are anything like your posts, it could well be that the customers rejected your work outright.
Again:
1) how long have you been working with them?
2) did they pay you in the past?
3) how much do they currently owe you?
4) did they explain their failure to pay?
We are hardly asking you to disclose your ID, your address or your bank account number ... so, why not simply answer these questions?
|
|
| AmonsEssays |
|
Dec 13, 10, 12:18PM
| #26 |
Joined: Dec 8, 10
Threads: 2
Posts: 201
|
rwaimba2: Wrong. I fail to understand how you (although I have read about your practice to delete names of persons to whom you are responding/quoting, I feel by using the active I do not come out as "personalizing" arguments) draw such a conclusion. From various threads here, let me give you an example, (http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/12/essayscam-org-essayfraud-orgs-purpose-19 7/) hardly can one establish the credibility of the site. I have not found any reason to accuse the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal of lacking credibility. I premise my arguments, you fail to identify how my premise is based on false logic or my conclusion a wrong deduction.
There is no such practice. I simply used the manual quote/quote without including the =username. You apparently didn't read very carefully.
You misunderstand my argument. I am not comparing this site to the NYT or the WSJ. Rather, I was saying that posting your proof twice, once on a blog and once here, would not be redundant, any more than the same article being posted twice, once in the NYT and once in the WSJ, is redundant.
rwaimba2: I wonder which truth I am avoiding here. I guess you could be familiar with some saying to the effect that a lie told over and over, could sometimes become a truth, off course, depending on the recipient. So your version of truth may not be so apparent to me.
No, and your assertions are really strange. My point is that, given that you have the evidence backed up natively on your hard drive AND you could put the evidence elsewhere, there is NO RISK to posting your evidence here, even if you honestly think despite no evidence to support it that posts are tampered with willy-nilly on this site.
rwaimba2: Finally, I could post some information I have watered down here. But as I have noted, I have removed various aspects that may affect whether this is evidence or "evidence." To clarify my earlier point, I will never, for instance, post detailed information here that includes order IDs, topics covered, payment values, or any other information that has the potential to reveal, for instance, the customer's identity. I have provided the reason for not doing so, if you care to read between the lines. But here's is some where I have removed substantial information.
So you need to anonymize it. Great. You can still post the relevant parts...
|
|
| oxipital |
|
Dec 13, 10, 12:45PM
| #27 |
Joined: Dec 4, 10
Posts: 3
|
I'm not entirely clear what the point of all the bickering is, really. And frankly, the evidence posted really doesn't provide much substance, between the lines or not. I'd recommend posting a screenshot of the page with any identifying ID numbers, account information, the like, redacted. I'd PM but apparently I can't without writing 5 useful messages (which I think is a subtle code word for "flames").
Also, did you contact FLC after you got stiffed? How did they respond?
|
|
| kefa |
|
Oct 30, 11, 03:50PM
| #28 |
Joined: Oct 30, 11
Posts: 5
|
freelancercareers.com and its affiliated companies are nothing but just a scam..
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
Oct 30, 11, 05:09PM
| #29 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
kefa: freelancercareers.com and its affiliated companies are nothing but just a scam..
Thanks for reviving a year-old thread with absolutely no new information.
|
|
| kefa |
|
Oct 30, 11, 05:16PM
| #30 |
Joined: Oct 30, 11
Posts: 5
|
Just a reminder. Does that hurt?
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
Oct 30, 11, 05:26PM
| #31 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,836
|
kefa: Just a reminder. Does that hurt?
It doesn't hurt, but it clutters the board with completely irrelevant bullsh*t just so you can get your name out there. That's basically spamming, and it isn't appreciated.
|
|
| dodofax |
Company Representative |
Edited by: dodofax Nov 26, 11, 07:54AM
| #32 |
Joined: Nov 25, 11
Threads: 1
Posts: 11
|
WritersBeware, do u have any good writers can recommand to me? i need writers for my company dodofax.com! we need good english level writers for chinese student eassy and dessertation.
|
|
