"dear," I absolutely hate this type of essay order

I am going to win my dispute on your order with my company, and take your money.

I prefer to just contact the customer directly to ask whether they want to order more pages or choose fewer sources before I write the paper.

RustyWriter is as crooked and vile as they come.

i know what you mean about the 'dear' comments.

hey address everyone as "dear..."

I prefer to just contact the customer directly to ask whether they want to order more pages or choose fewer sources before I write the paper. Most of the time they end up thanking me for letting them know it was a problem and they order more pages for the order.

Tried to game the system, rob the writer and when he failed, went ballistic.

I am going to win my dispute on your order with my company, and take your money.

sure does.

WRT

their

only a moron would pick up orders he purportedly 'hates.

Are you also a proponent of Ebonics?

do you feel superior to black people because you speak middle-class English?

and I don't have to be bright, when I'm this pretty

Moronic "educators" like you make certain students feel that they are NOT equal and do NOT have the inherent ability to perform and succeed.

I just pictured you

things are getting a little weird,

As much as you'd like to make it a race issue, it's not. It's a state-of-mind issue. Blacks and whites alike staunchly opposed Ebonics, which is why it failed. Educators should not dumb-down, REWARD ignorance, and/or justify poor performance by leaning on students' imaginary crutches! Moronic "educators" like you make certain students feel that they are NOT equal and do NOT have the inherent ability to perform and succeed. You breed failure.

Ummmmm, this is an abusive and inaccurate statement. American English from the perspective of the Brits is "dumb[ed]-down". There is healthy disagreement among educators and cultural anthropologists as to the value of Ebonics and "black English". Certainly, it is a discrete cultural form that has existed for centuries and impacted conventional language.

[NEGATIVELY] impacted conventional language.

Ummmm, keep your abrasive, incendiary opinions to yourself.

Anyone who thinks that Ebonics has "value" is an idiot. Tell me—if a kid grows up speaking Klingon in his/her household, should he/she be coddled by his/her teachers and told that his/her ignorant, uneducated form of communication is acceptable in the business world and professional life?

Yes. Accusations of "abrasiveness" followed by the word "idiot", when the correction itself was very respectful and not personal. Perhaps a review of "ad hominem" is in order.

Ummmmm, this is an abusive and inaccurate statement.

That doesn't make their language, the way they talk to each other, any less valid.

it is arbitrary power that makes people insist that "ain't" isn't grammatical or "proper English"

WRONG. Thank goodness that you're not teaching my kids. My kids actually have standards and aspirations above and beyond mediocrity. Your approach explains why the American educational system has become a joke.

Any credibility that you had just flew out of the window. The correctness of "ain't" is arbitrary? Funny—I'll give you that much. However, I'm also going to have to ask you to prove your assertion. For what words is "ain't" a contraction?

In any respect, that's not what I said. And you probably won't teach your kids much, no offense. I don't mean that you are unintelligent or are incapable, but rather that peer groups are far more connected to the way people learn language. My argument is that a language form, a dialect, that is perfectly coherent to the people who speak it, and is different from another language, is clearly a fully-formed dialect. This is the simple DEFINITION of a dialect. You may have your own value judgments about whether or not that language is GOOD, but then I have to wonder: How is that different from saying that Yiddish isn't okay, or Arabic, or whatever else? Yes, people should learn a "common" language, a shared way of communicating. The Chinese have done this for millennia by having "dialects" that are really different languages but a shared written script. We can do this here by having a shared language, which is a median of all the regional dialects (Brooklyn, Boston, Southern, black, Californian, etc.), and then letting people speak to each other as they want.

This is how languages evolve. Slang, borrowing from other languages... "Dude" and "yo" are part of the common lexicon now. That's just what happens.

"Ain't" or "aint", however you wish to spell it, is a perfectly legitimate word

forum troll

When a customer orders a professional paper in the English language from who he/she is led to believe is a qualified, native English-speaking writer with a degree from an American university, the issue is black and white. There is no gray area in formal academics. There is correct and there is incorrect—period. Your assertions about matters not directly tied to the essay industry have no place in—or relevance to—this forum.

We're not dealing with schoolyard slang. This is a forum about formal, professional, academic writing.

What's your business URL again? I'm sure that customers will just love your stance.

LMAO! You showed up here and immediately began sh*tting all over many different members in multiple threads. Wake up—you're the 20-post TROLL.

Unless you have something of value or substance to state about the professional essay industry, I'm not going to waste my time.

This does not mean that British English is an illegitimate dialect, clearly. Same thing for Ebonics.

Oh, and for the sake of potential customers: I will never use the word "ain't" except in a relevant quotation.

You mean, AFTER I made a correction to a point

VERY nice triple post, by the way.

Nice quadruple post, by the way.

I seriously recommend you take some kind of tranquilizer or calming agent...

Ebonics is an ignorant, illegitimate form of English that has absolutely NO place in either academia or the professional/corporate world. That is a fact.

If it is a "perfectly legitimate word," why would you only use it when/if quoting someone else? Why do you go out of your way to avoid using perfectly legitimate words?

You made no correction. In order for one to have made a correction, one must have made an opposing statement that is, indeed, correct. You did not do so. What you made is a calculated, "ummmmm-based," smartass, wholly incorrect attack on both my personal view and that of the overwhelming majority of Americans.



Why, by the way, do you feel the need to manually delete the username from quotes? Like your introduction to this forum, that's a little rude and controlling of you, isn't it?

Are you trying to make some sort of point? It's a forum, control freak.

Really? Why are you now making that distinction when your personal cash flow is on the line? In case you've forgotten your own quote, here it is:

I seriously recommend that you f off. You're going to love my review of your half-ass site (backed by your ignorant assertions in this thread, of course).