Countdown till Close down: Will it EVER happen? ^____^

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Day 779. Life is good. :D

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Hoho! It's on its way there. Day 780. ^_^

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

EW_writer = criminal apologist (who couldn't out-write me even if a blender accident were to leave me with no fingers) for his fraudulent employer in Ukraine

Detailed PROOF of his employer's FRAUD:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/403368/voir_dire.html

Bottom line—don't believe a single word that ANYONE types if it is not accompanied by verifiable evidence from REPUTABLE, third parties. EW_writer will NEVER post evidence of ANY kind because he CAN'T. He's a criminal and admitted agent of one of the most fraudulent, deceptive companies in the industry. In this forum, he has flat-out stated that customers have no rights, a belief that is clearly reflected in the fraudulent business operations of his employer.

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

To that, any legitimate member will attest, based purely on available evidence, his admissions of fraud/deception, and his past comments.

I do not reveal my true identity/location to clients. I work for a website that masquerades as an American company. There, happy? ^_^

WritersBeware:

EW_writer's words of criminal wisdom: "Customers have no rights."

That never came from me. Maybe you ought to read my post again and attempt to understand it better? :)

EW_writer:

I'm betting that the people who are actually paid to do hatchet jobs on writing sites over the net are very few. Most of the individuals who set out to destroy a site's reputation are site owners themselves who do not need to get paid to be properly motivated to make attempts at ruining the competition. Still, I believe that there are "professionals" who have above-average writing skills that some companies use to take on the perpetual duty of launching campaigns to mar the competition. These select few devote a ridiculous amount of time gathering "evidence" while hiding behind some practically unbelievable cover story such as being some sort of successful philanthropist just making contributions for the common good. In order to make the cover story believable to lesser thinkers, these people utilize their above-average writing skills to make them look credible.

The battle fought in the message boards which are the battlegrounds of these professional hatchet workers is far more simple than they make it appear. They boldly proclaim that they are out to take down particular sites by presenting one supposedly damaging evidence after another but in a span of years, these evidences fail to do anything. If people would look into why this is so, one thing would become apparent. This is that all these evidences are virtually unverifiable unless actual authorities move in to verify them, something that authorities would not do because what they are really concerned about is not that some writing sites are off-shore or that these sites lie about where they are based but rather the fact that writing sites provide homework that students submit for credit. Anyone can verify this by trying to find any evidence that the United States government has actually made any attempt at all to bring down off-shore companies for being off-shore and lying to their clients about it. Despite the overwhelming evidences and confessions made on this message board, no official move has been made because this matter is simply a non-issue. Instead, what people would find are academic institutions trying to get the government involved in clamping down on writing sites in general that provide homework to students. But if this is the case, does it mean that professional hatchet workers are fighting a lost cause? The answer to that is no, because the actual cause of these people is not actually to close certain sites down but to make it seem like these sites would not provide quality work for students by making legitimacy equate to quality. In effect, what these people constantly do is create straw men. In logical fallacies, straw men are arguments constructed to look like they are relevant to the issue when in fact they are not. Hatchet workers construct straw men and then tackle and destroy them, making the illusion that they have won legitimate arguments when really, all that they have one are arguments that they themselves created. Thus, when unsuspecting students looking for a place to buy homework read these people's work, they are automatically made to feel that the sites that hatchet workers point out will scam them out of their money because these sites lie about their location and their writers' academic qualifications when these two have virtually no proven correlation with writing competence (how many great writers actually have MAs or PhDs?).

Still, there are occasions when these professionals are forced to cease their efforts and bluntly speaking, are made to shut up. These occasions occur when they commit mistakes that make them look inept or that invariably hurt their employers' interests. For example, if such a person establishes himself or herself as an excellent writer, proving that he or she is also prone to mistakes and hammering on these mistakes constantly would make the person's employers pull the hatchet worker out temporarily to let the issue die down without the worker ever addressing it properly. Another example is when a hatchet worker inadvertently presents solid evidence pointing out that it is more likely for students to get caught cheating if they buy from the companies that the hatchet worker supports. These things are likely to get the worker suspended for some time and perhaps seriously penalized.

The bottom line is, customers should always be wary of what they read on the internet regardless of how well it is written or how convincing it seems. They should focus on the key questions when looking for a writing service rather than being lured to watch the straw man spectacles that hatchet workers offer. Would the service provide me with papers written in the quality that I desire? Would I be safe in using the papers that I buy for whatever purpose I have? These are the only questions that matter.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

EW_writer:

That never came from me. Maybe you ought to read my post again and attempt to understand it better? :)

Do you REALLY want to go there, crook? (Please type, "Yes.")

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Day 782. I'm still waiting, numskull. ^_^

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

The content of the following link proves that, on January 14, 2008, EW_writer denied being a fraud and also denied that consumers have rights:

To those reading:
Don't take this loon's word for it. Click the link and read the posts.

It's still day 782, people. ^_^

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

Heck, I'll make it easier:

Read the post if you want to know the true story. It's day 783 of WB's worthless efforts. ^_^

Joined: Feb 11, 09
Threads: 2
Posts: 288

Break!

25% of India's population with highest IQs
is greater than the total population of the United States. WOW!

take a look at this

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

1. Where's your proof that I have been personally trying to get your filthy employer shut down for 783 days?

2. Where's your proof that I have addressed and OUTED only your filthy employer in the last 783 days?

Hahaha.. what proof? You've been claiming time and time again how "damaging" the evidences that you post are. C'mon moron, these antics of yours are getting more and more pathetic, making it all the more apparent how totally worthless you are both as a poster on this message board and as a person. ^_^

Day 783 of WB's failure, folks. :D

Humble, I'll watch the clip later (got a resume and a disso to complete within the next 3 hours). What pheelyks says about the population difference between the two countries is correct though. Ratios rather than actual quantities can provide a better comparison.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

Apparently, you missed the questions. Here they are again:

WritersBeware:

1. Where's your proof that I have been personally trying to get your filthy employer shut down for 783 days?

2. Where's your proof that I have addressed and OUTED only your filthy employer in the last 783 days?

Good luck, simpleton. (Telling people to "look for themselves" isn't an answer, COWARD. Man up or shut up.)

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

EW_writer:

Hahaha.. what proof? You've been claiming time and time again how "damaging" the evidences that you post are.
C'mon moron, these antics of yours are getting more and more pathetic, making it all the more apparent how totally worthless you are both as a poster on this message board and as a person. ^_^

WritersBeware:

Absolutely ridiculous post.

People shouldn't take statements like this seriously from someone who doesn't even know how to count.

Hahaha!

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

Apparently, EW_writer can't read, because he keeps refusing to answer simple questions in favor of throwing up the childish (yet calculated) smokescreen that I "can't count":

WritersBeware:

1. Where's your proof that I have been personally trying to get your filthy employer shut down for 783 days?

2. Where's your proof that I have addressed and OUTED only your filthy employer in the last 783 days?

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

WritersBeware:

1. Where's your proof that I have been personally trying to get your filthy employer shut down for 783 days?

2. Where's your proof that I have addressed and OUTED only your filthy employer in the last 783 days?

Prove your accusation, you cowardly, filthy piece of criminal trash.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

EW_writer:

I'll just keep answering the same question with this same valid response, thank you very much. ^_^

That's not an answer to my SPECIFIC questions, scumbag. Provide specific answers to JUSTIFY your claim that I have been personally trying to shut down your employer, and ONLY your employer, since the day that I signed up. Will you continue to CHEAT the research just like you CHEAT your clients?

Hurry up, COWARD.

Prediction: You WON'T because you CAN'T. POS!

You lose, as always.

By the way, we're still waiting for you to provide your username at EW and EB. Step up or SHUT UP.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

EW_writer:

WritersBeware:
That's not an answer to my SPECIFIC questions

Oh yes, it is. Any average reasonable person can see that.

Retard, once again, ANSWER the specific questions and provide PROOF to support your defamatory accusations:

1. Where's your proof that I have been personally trying to get your filthy employer shut down for 780+ days?

2. Where's your proof that I have addressed and OUTED only your filthy employer in the last 780+ days?

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Day 784.

Secret words: one & was.

Why? I'll let you know when I get a bite.

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

OxbridgeResearchers:

Can someone please explain why this thread is up to 230+ posts?

A huge portion of the posts are tantrums by WB, who just can't take it that her worthlessness is being exposed on a daily basis.

OxbridgeResearchers:

What's the point of it? Essaywriters/Mizyuk are trash and believe themselves above the law ... why would anyone even begin to dispute that? If Mizyuk weren't feeling the heat he would not have engaged in the change of ownership theatrics ...

There's no hidden agenda, if that's what your asking. I'm just giving the good fer' nothing a**hole something she very much deserves for how she behaves on this forum. ^_^ It's not a chore of nobility, it's a fun hobby. :) I used to do this to people who deserve it on out local message boards. It's good to see someone who thinks so highly of herself be put to shame.

OxbridgeResearchers:

EW - you slammed the company several times, so what's the point of this? As a writer for Mizyuk, you should know (better than anybody else) that you are hardly receiving fair pay for your work. He barely gives his writers a third of what he makes per order (25% would be more accurate) - is that honest or proper? The orders EW has on the board at this moment range from a minimum of $2.64 to a maximum of $9.26. The overall average is $4.8 per page!

Actually, I don't take any order (unless it's REALLY simple) for anything less than $10/page. I did prove in another thread that most if not all American companies hire writers only from a very limited number of locations. Thus, until there are better options for us competent writers who reside in third world nations, we have to stick to the companies that are willing to hire us and at the very least, pays for good work.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

OxbridgeResearchers:

why would anyone even begin to dispute that?

EW_writer has a vested interests in his employer's ongoing ability to commit fraud.

OxbridgeResearchers:

If Mizyuk weren't feeling the heat he would not have engaged in the change of ownership theatrics ...

Bingo.

EW_writer:

very much deserves for how she behaves on this forum

Yeah, that's your FAMOUS excuse for why you do what you do in this forum. You're just mad because I constantly CRUSH you and every, single one of your fraudulent kin who have come here to attack me simply for posting the truth about your underhanded employers. It must make you feel very small to know that all of your COMBINED efforts have never been able to defeat me—or my publication of FACT and EVIDENCE—regardless of how very hard you've tried, and continue to try on a daily basis. Sad. Good job! :)

EW_writer:

good fer' nothing a**hole

Yeah, I'm the one with the "behavior" problem . . . .

EW_writer:

Oh and yeah, it's day 785. ^_^

Since the spineless coward refuses to prove how it's been "785" days or anything remotely close to it, why don't we just skip to a clean 1,000? Yes, sounds good—1,000 it is! EW_writer likes meaningless, hollow numbers.

----------------------------------

PS: I'm still waiting for EW_writer to posts another one of his trusty surveys about who people trust and believe more—me or him. He won't do it because he doesn't want to get b*tch slapped in his own thread—AGAIN. LOL!

PSS: I'm also still waiting for him to post his username at EW and EB so that I can show ample examples of his fraud.

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,393

You're a chicksh*t criminal. You've NEVER stepped up to a challenge. The mod allows you to stay simply because your criminal act is amusing (and continues to help BURY your fraudulent employer further).

Previous thread	Next thread
freelancewritingcenter.com not hiring new writers??	Uvocorp Mistreating Writers