Countdown till Close down: Will it EVER happen? ^____^

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 01:35AM | #121

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

You denied being a fraud for quite some time. After going back and forth, you finally broke after I cornered you

Err.. was this in one of those dream sequences of yours? :p

learner:

cost of loosing to a scabies infested WARTHOG.

You have one too many "o"s and I'm sorry about your disease. I hope that you get to afford a cure soon through whatever job it is that you do (which isn't academic writing, I hope >.<). I'll be praying for you.

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 01:37AM | #122

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Anyone wanna take a guess why WB's so affected by this thread?

Edited by: learner May 31, 09, 01:46AM | #123

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

EW_writer:

You have one too many "o"s and I'm sorry about your disease.

OOO....The sissy boy with a foul mouth and predilection to vulgarities has a real reedy ego.

May 31, 09, 01:49AM | #124

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

Err.. was this in one of those dream sequences of yours? :p

The content of the following link proves that, on January 14, 2008, EW_writer denied being a fraud and also denied that consumers have rights:

http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/9_406_0.html#msg5328

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 01:52AM | #125

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

Anyone wanna take a guess why WB's so affected by this thread?

Anybody want to take a guess as to why EW_writer tends to make false accusations in the form of questions? That way, after I pummel him with facts and prove that his accusation is false, he can conveniently claim that it was "only a question." Not clever in the least.

May 31, 09, 02:00AM | #126

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

September 17, 2008:

EW_writer:

Let's say it, I do benefit from essaywriter.net's practice of fudging the truth about my identity. Because they tell customers that they hire American writers, more customers tend to order.

May 31, 09, 02:01AM | #127

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

learner:

OOO....The sissy boy with a foul mouth and predeliction to vulgarities has a real reedy ego.

I don't get how my statement is supposed to say anything about my ego. Still.. you really shouldn't use large words if you can't spell them right. It makes you look like you're trying too hard (and that you're having trouble reading that thesaurus you're holding :p).

Oh.. and who's in the picture, Mike? Your bff, or just your bf? :p

WritersBeware:

The content of the following link proves that, on January 14, 2008, EW_writer denied being a fraud and also denied that consumers have rights:

http://www.essayscam.org/Forum/9_406_0.html#msg5328

Err.. in that thread, I still openly admitted to being an ESL writer writing for American consumers under the guise of being American. What did I lie about?

WritersBeware:

I really am just curious as to why you're taking this thread so seriously when I'm just making a count. Is it affecting you that much that you've been contributing evidences against essaywriters.net for over 700 days now and yet the site is still as strong as ever?

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 02:02AM | #128

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

EW_writer:

Let's say it, I do benefit from essaywriter.net's practice of fudging the truth about my identity. Because they tell customers that they hire American writers, more customers tend to order.

Cool. So what was I lying about? It's not like I was stating something that wasn't plainly obvious... o.O

May 31, 09, 02:03AM | #129

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

September 17, 2008:

EW_writer:

I fake my address to my clients all the time . . . it's not like "honesty and transparency" is the middle name of the term paper writing industry.

May 31, 09, 02:06AM | #130

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

EW_writer:

I fake my address to my clients all the time . . . it's not like "honesty and transparency" is the middle name of the term paper writing industry.

Yes I do. I didn't lie about that.

Edited by: learner May 31, 09, 02:10AM | #131

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

EW_writer:

BOY, YOU DEFINATELY MUST BE THE MOST SOUGHT AFTER WRITER IN THE THIRD RATE PORN BUSINESS. WHY DON'T YOU GIVE UP THIS PSEUDOINTELLECTUALIST FACADE AND REVEAL YOUR REAL VOCATION. WE WILL CERTAINLY MAKE CONCESSIONS FOR YOU BY DECLARING PORN TO BE A VALID FORM OF POPULAR SELF EXPRESSION. AND NEXT TIME YOU READ MY MESSAGES, KEEP A GOOD DICTIONARY BY YOUR SIDE. SOME ACADEMIC WRITERS ARE REALLY EDUCATED.

May 31, 09, 02:10AM | #132

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

September 16, 2008:

EW_writer:

I work for essaywriters.net. . . . I believe that there is nothing wrong if my employers fraudulently tell my clients that I'm an American writer because like everyone here is fond of saying, nationality shouldn't matter. :P What do you have to say to that? :D

May 31, 09, 02:12AM | #133

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

October 15, 2008:

EW_writer:

WritersBeware:
Oh, and by the way, I only mention your country of origin because you LIE about it on EssayBay.

Hell yeah, I do.

OxbridgeResearchers

May 31, 09, 02:14AM | #134

Joined: May 2, 09
Threads: 6
Posts: 939

EW_writer:

Oh.. and didn't one of those in your list actually agree with me when I said that the lurking clients here would all come rushing to me if they knew my essaybay identity? :p Clearly that at least means that I'm not fraudulently posing as a writer where that person is concerned.

EW, what I said was the people would come if they found out who you really were and not if they found out your essaybay ID. I also said that I have never ever come across anybody who sells themselves as short as you do.

EW - I believe that your primary purpose on this forum is to goad WB and try to discredit her (something of a marketing technique for essaywriters). The only problem is that you cannot dscredit her and, to date, have not. The reason is not just that she talks about sites which we all know to be trash but because she publishes evidence ... she is credible.

If any of you recall, I personally clashed with WB twice. The first time was when discussing the *****/SNR case. The Westlaw case I'd accessed discussed the ruling against SNR - WB said it wasn't true and we clashed ... a couple of days ago, I stumbled across the New Jersey case and, guess what ... she was right. The ruling had been against *****. Love or hate WB but, at least admit that she is CREDIBLE.

At the end of the day, why is everybody so bothered by what she says? Chacha claimed that according to WB and others on this forum, ALL companies in the industry were scammers. Not true and that was never stated nor claimed. A great many are and isn't it the purpose of this forum to call them out/expose them?

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 03:39AM | #135

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

OxbridgeResearchers:

I live in the third world. The favorable exchange rate allows me to be easily contented.

OxbridgeResearchers:

EW - I believe that your primary purpose on this forum is to goad WB and try to discredit her (something of a marketing technique for essaywriters).

They (EW) don't even know who I am (at least I hope they don't considering how honest I am about them). My primary purpose on this forum is to goad WB. Period. ^_^ Like I said, I don't have anything against any of her evidences on who's pretending to be who. I don't even have anything against her credibility. I can even say that short of claiming that all of ew's writers are crappy (which is untrue because of me and a few others), WB can pretty much say ANYTHING about the site and it wouldn't bother me. Sure, I'd snap back every now and then but that's more for sport rather than anything else. I just like to make her angry over and over again. It seems so fitting for her to be treated that way. It's grown to be quite a hobby. >.< Do you understand me now? :)

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 03:48AM | #136

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

learner:

From your violent reaction.. I'd say he's your bf. ^__^ Don't worry.. people here accept you for who you are. ^_^

Edited by: learner May 31, 09, 06:25AM | #137

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

Dear EW, somebody wants to thank you from the heart of his bottom, for being such an accomplished member of his species. FOR SPECIAL EFFECTS, PLEASE ENLARGE THE PICTURE.

May 31, 09, 06:58AM | #138

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Sigh... dude, if your intention is to piss me off you're certainly not doing a good job of it. C'mon man.. I'll sure you can do better than posting a picture of yourself (your bf is lucky to have you by the way, you seem to have very pronounced features). Please.. please do a better job.. XD You're botching it up so much that I'm beginning to feel like pretending to be angry just to give you some satisfaction. >.<

Day 772 still. ^_^

May 31, 09, 07:51AM | #139

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

Hee Ew! Here's a HAIKU that I wrote for you-----

He goes on and on
Boring the life out of all members
Somebody- Please tell him to shut his a-s hole of a mouth!
Will you!?!?!?

I HOPE YOU WILL APPRECIATE THE JESTURE?

May 31, 09, 08:12AM | #140

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

Err... I don't think Haikus are supposed to be that direct and plain but ok, I appreciate the gesture. ^_^ Forgive me if I don't make one for you. :( I gotta finish 2 more CVs and a pending essaybay project tonight.

May 31, 09, 11:17AM | #141

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

Dear Ew and other writers, I think now I can afford to express the serious side of my personality. Sorry EW, I have nothing serious against you or your ideology. I had to just synchronize with the vibes at this forum, so I picked you up to start a good natured bantering. What I have learnt at this forum is that here we have a whole range of writers interacting with eachother. Some are exceptionally talented with English being their first language, like WB and OR. Then we have writers like EW, who hail from a third world country and have ESL credentials. Then there are those like me who are from a relatively better doing country, though again being an ESL. What are all of us trying to do with our lives. I will tell you. WE ALL ARE TRYING TO MAKE A LIVING OUT OF THE EDUCATION AND SKILLS THAT WE MANAGED TO ACCRURE AMIDST THE GOOD OR BAD OPPORTUNITIES THAT CAME OUR WAY. Writers like BW and OR are lucky being from developed countries where freelancing business is more organized and regulated, not denying the fact that they are exceptionally talented writers with English being their first language. But they need to understand that why are writers like EW willing to work for much less or are hesitant to reveal their nationality. Eventually it is a free market and there exist customers for both good or bad writers. Hence the basic objective of this forum should be to come out with ideas that could make this industry more organized at an international level. For Example there could be an international body of freelance writers, that could come out with a grading system for the freelance writers. Definately writers like OR and BW would enjoy the top rating in such a situation. Still writers like EW and Learner would be happy with their relatively lower grades, but with an opprtunity to earn a living in their own little world. Belive me there is enough work in the market to accomodate hoards of reasonably if not exceptionally talented freelancers.The essay writing companies are able to take advantage of the freelancers and the minimally talented people are able to enter the writing business, because there exists no single body of freelance writers that could organize and regulate this vocation.

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 11:46AM | #142

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

learner:

Still writers like EW and Learner would be happy with their relatively lower grades, but with an opprtunity to earn a living in their own little world.

While I did admit to having English as a second language, to living in the third world and to hiding my identity and nationality to clients, I never admitted to being second rate to anyone. ^_^ I charge relatively lower rates NOT because my work is inferior. Rather, it's because I can afford to offer competitive prices since I live in an area where the cost of living is much much lower.

Day 773, people. Have a good night!

May 31, 09, 11:52AM | #143

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

In that case, EW I was talking only about myself. An international body of freelance writers will not only enable the writers like you to charge the premium market prices, bearing the top ratings, but will to a great extent end up this business of scams and scamsters. Infact the genuine essay writing companies will prefer to employ writers accredited to a credible body, which they can trust. Besides it will move the competition more in the realm of capability and quality, then being based on one's nationality.

humble

May 31, 09, 11:55AM | #144

Joined: Feb 11, 09
Threads: 2
Posts: 288

learner:

Then there are those like me who are from a relatively better doing country

India
LOL :D

How could you say that without knowing which country EW is from?

Edited by: learner May 31, 09, 11:56AM | #145

Joined: May 30, 09
Posts: 59

Dear Humble, I know EW is from Burundi.

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 12:25PM | #146

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

I never admitted to being second rate to anyone.

You don't have to "admit" anything. I'm a better writer (even while intoxicated, with a hangover, while sleeping, with the flu, etc.). Your jealousy is ugly.

Day #[insert EW_writer's age in days] of EW_writer being an inferior writer to me.

OxbridgeResearchers

May 31, 09, 02:26PM | #147

Joined: May 2, 09
Threads: 6
Posts: 939

EW_writer:

My primary purpose on this forum is to goad WB. Period. ^_^ Like I said, I don't have anything against any of her evidences on who's pretending to be who. I don't even have anything against her credibility.

Ok ... that's one step forward. You admit that WB is credible and that her evidence stands up ... Therefore, you recognise that the woman has something worthwhile to say. It is precisely because of this that I don't understand why you are trying to goad her. Leave out the `fun' part ... you are infinitely more intelligent than that. So why are you trying to goad and discredit a person whose evidence is solid? By doing so, you really are playing into the hands of the scammers, most of whom would give an arm and a leg to shut her up.

learner:

Some are exceptionally talented with English being their first language, like WB and OR.

Some ESL writers are exceptionally talented ... flawless English, a real flair for words, etc. I, personally, do take on ESL writers and have no qualms about doing so. I do not, however, ask that they degrade themselves by posing as American or British and I do not tell my customers that all are American and British. I guarantee flawless language skills, irrespective of nationality.

What I object to is (regardless of nationality) the entrance of poorly-educated, linguistically challenged individuals into the industry. They give both the industry and the real writers a bad name. Does it even stand to reason that someone like Chacha proclaim himself a professional writer and demand payment for his WRITTEN work? I would similarly object to a poorly educated, linguistically limited English person working as a writer - and, believe me, there are many of those. So, as far as I am concerned (and I am sure WB would agree because she has emphasised this point on multiple occasions), the debate is not over nationality but over academic and linguistic qualifications.

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 03:05PM | #148

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

Right, right, and right again.

The sole reason that geographical location and native language are issues at all—and I am compelled to highlight them in this forum—is because the Ukrainian owners of Universal Research and their ilk lie about BOTH in order to fool American customers into ordering! Indeed, EW_writer has admitted such:

EW_writer:

Let's say it, I do benefit from essaywriter.net's practice of fudging the truth about my identity. Because they tell customers that they hire American writers, more customers tend to order.

This is both IMMORAL and ILLEGAL!

OxbridgeResearchers

May 31, 09, 03:31PM | #149

Joined: May 2, 09
Threads: 6
Posts: 939

WritersBeware:

This is both IMMORAL and ILLEGAL!

Presisely! Deception is unequivocally immoral, as is deliberately depriving customers of the right to choose (by not giving them the correct info). From the legal perspective, it is outright consumer fraud.

And should we just use a tiny bit of logic here, we'll find that any who so blatantly lie about who they are and their writers' qualifications do not have the best intentions in the world. If the Ukranians (and all other scammers) were remotely serious about fulfiling their contractual obligations towards their customers, they would not have to conceal their identities. They are hiding behind false personas because they believe that doing so will protect them from legal charges by making it more difficult to tie them to the countless charges of consumer fraud they are bound to face one day (soon, I hope).

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 04:35PM | #150

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

OxbridgeResearchers:

My name is EW_writer, and my defense to the indefensible is that our customers DESERVE to get cheated. What's wrong with that? ^_^

Day #[insert my age in days] of me being an inferior writer to WritersBeware.

May 31, 09, 07:03PM | #151

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

I'm a better writer (even while intoxicated, with a hangover, while sleeping, with the flu, etc.). Your jealousy is ugly.

You don't even know what a t-test is and you think that using 7 samples already constitutes as reliable evidence. >.< Go write about Shakespeare while I write about Oh, I don't know... modeling airplane emissions using nonlinear regression models based on the Weibull distribution. The point is, WB may be an excellent spell and grammar checker, but her input here on several occasions prove that she has no clout at all where it comes to conducting quantitative researches. ANYBODY can write about the works of Wordsworth and seem credible so long as their English is straight but not everybody can write a thorough, statistically sound paper on a complex topic no matter how good they are in spinning words. Only a math major who is also an excellent writer can do this and well... that's what I am. ^_^

Hey WB, what's the derivative of e^cosx? Yeah... I thought so. Shut up. :)

OxbridgeResearchers:

So why are you trying to goad and discredit a person whose evidence is solid? By doing so, you really are playing into the hands of the scammers, most of whom would give an arm and a leg to shut her up.

That's where I disagree with you. You seem to still be fixed into this idea that what she's doing here is actually affecting the business of established off-shore companies such as essaywriters.net. I've been with the company for years and orders have never dwindled away from normal levels during the peak seasons. In fact, last season there were more than usual (around 500 daily with many paying over $10/page).

OxbridgeResearchers:

What I object to is (regardless of nationality) the entrance of poorly-educated, linguistically challenged individuals into the industry. They give both the industry and the real writers a bad name. Does it even stand to reason that someone like Chacha proclaim himself a professional writer and demand payment for his WRITTEN work? I would similarly object to a poorly educated, linguistically limited English person working as a writer - and, believe me, there are many of those. So, as far as I am concerned (and I am sure WB would agree because she has emphasised this point on multiple occasions), the debate is not over nationality but over academic and linguistic qualifications.

I agree that the super crappy writer who plagiarizes should be shut out of the business. However, I also see learner's point that there is a market for both "good" and "bad" writers. I've had some clients who after receiving their work, asked for me to revise the work and make grammatical errors here and there to make it more like something they've actually written. These are mostly ESL students whose writing skills are very poor and who would not want to submit a perfect paper. I believe that the market does purge the totally useless ones easily enough. Even if they do get hired by say essaywriters.net, they almost never get paid (that's why they come running here). At essaybay, it is very rare for a client to accept a first time writer, and I always warn clients to talk to their writers first so that they can at least see if the writer can speak at the level of English that they require them to write in.

WritersBeware:

This is both IMMORAL and ILLEGAL!

Oh, but isn't selling homework also an immoral and academically condemnable act? Let's not play the morality card because as how I and humble and even OR explained, what we're all doing, writing homework for students, is in the morally gray. Now as for legalities, you say that the operation of essaywriters.net is illegal. Ok, so be it. It is illegal. Now what? :) I'll work as a writer for the sites that pay well enough and that accept me for as long as I want to.

WritersBeware:

and my defense to the indefensible is that our customers DESERVE to get cheated. What's wrong with that? ^_^

Customers care about output. They don't care who writes that output so long as the output is good. I'm not cheating anyone because I give them well their money's worth. :)

Day 773 still, people.

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 07:22PM | #152

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

Day #[insert EW_writer's age in days] of EW_writer being an inferior writer to me.

Day #[insert WritersBeware's age in days] of WritersBeware still thinking that arithmetic is all she needs to write quantitative research papers (6/7=0.86! Oh my god.. 86% of students DO NOT use the papers that they buy to cheat!!! Eureka!). ^__^

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 07:39PM | #153

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

Typed like a true apologist and criminal . . . .

EW_writer:

ANYBODY can write about the works of Wordsworth

Gee, I bet that not even Nostradamus could have predicted that you'd respond with that excuse-laden nonsense. Unlike you, I am not a street-walking writer, so I've never had the slightest need or desire to advertise my areas of writing & research expertise in this forum. In fact, I've been particularly mindful to NOT post any of that information so as to AVOID people asking me to help them. Unlike you, I'm not here to sell my abilities—or my soul. So, in summary, you're "talking out of your *ss" yet again.

"Me sucky sucky writer. Me so ornery. Me write you long time."
- VW_writer, 1968

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 07:45PM | #154

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

You just don't get it, do you? The LEGAL EVIDENCE that I posted—from a US FEDERAL COURT CASE—may be the ONLY credible, real-world evidence that is available on the matter. As small as the sample size may be, it is more than sufficient to prove you to be a clueless liar. (It also trumps the grand total of zero/0%/none/0/zip/diddly-squat/goose egg/hill of beans/nada/zilch evidence that you have posted.)

Boston University couldn't prove that "all students who buy example papers cheat," even after filing a lawsuit and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and research costs, yet you still insist that you're correct. Sad.

Edited by: EW_writer May 31, 09, 08:01PM | #155

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

You just don't get it, do you? The LEGAL EVIDENCE that I posted—from a US FEDERAL COURT CASE—may be the ONLY credible, real-world evidence that is available on the matter.

Your report didn't even say how credible the 6/7 number was taken by the courts. >.< The fact that one company presented it as evidence doesn't mean that it was valued highly by the judge or jury. Did Boston lose because of that particular piece of evidence? Did it say so in your report? :p See how that cookie crumbles? They use statisticians as resource persons in court cases too. I know because I've served as such once. ^_^

EW_writer:

ANYBODY can write about the works of Wordsworth

Why can't you complete the quote? Oh yeah.. because it would mess up what you want to write about it.

EW_writer:

ANYBODY can write about the works of Wordsworth and seem credible so long as their English is straight but not everybody can write a thorough, statistically sound paper on a complex topic no matter how good they are in spinning words.

That's better.

Hey WB, what about my question? I'll make it easier for you. Can you explain how to get the derivative of lnx with respect to x using the four-step rule?

Oh.. lil' WB can do her English well but can't do her math beyond MDAS.. Now that's sad. ^_^

Edited by: WritersBeware May 31, 09, 08:30PM | #156

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

EW_writer:

Did Boston lose because of that particular piece of evidence?

LOL, yes, in fact, BU did lose largely because of that evidence!

"Because BU found just one student plagiarist, the federal court ruled there was no way the university could possibly prove its claim . . . ."

SOURCE:
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=31843&CFID=8419205&CFT OKEN=27456135

EW_writer:

Hey WB, what about my question? I'll make it easier for you. Can you explain how to get the derivative of lnx with respect to x using the four-step rule?

Have I ever claimed that my expertise is in statistics or mathematics? Nope. Perhaps, you need a reading tutor?

WritersBeware:

Unlike you, I am not a street-walking writer, so I've never had the slightest need or desire to advertise my areas of writing & research expertise in this forum. In fact, I've been particularly mindful to NOT post any of that information so as to AVOID people asking me to help them. Unlike you, I'm not here to sell my abilities—or my soul. So, in summary, you're "talking out of your *ss" yet again.

May 31, 09, 09:20PM | #157

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

"Because BU found just one student plagiarist, the federal court ruled there was no way the university could possibly prove its claim of $75,000 in losses from each company--the amount necessary to qualify the case as a federal matter."

That still doesn't make your 86% generalizable for the industry in general. The Paper Store may have gotten away with it but as you can read:

"Two of the companies BU originally sued have settled, paying damages and promising not to sell papers to BU students in the future. Two other firms closed their web sites and have not responded to the lawsuit."

Which means that while The Paper Store escaped out of a technicality, many other companies did not because...

"17 states--including Massachusetts--have made it illegal to sell research material knowing or having reason to believe that it will be submitted for academic credit."

and they wouldn't have done that if the practice was becoming so prevalent. ^_^ Hey.. thanks for the evidence. I'd have been too lazy to look for that. :D

WritersBeware:

Have I ever claimed that my expertise is in statistics or mathematics? Nope. Perhaps, you need a reading tutor?

Oh, but you've tried to sound that way, haven't you Ms. General Statistics and now, Ms. 86%?

May 31, 09, 10:01PM | #158

Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 144
Posts: 8,394

You are obviously CLUELESS about American law, which does not at all surprise me, since you so blatantly ignore and violate the laws that govern your operations.

EW_writer:

"Two of the companies BU originally sued have settled, paying damages and promising not to sell papers to BU students in the future. Two other firms closed their web sites and have not responded to the lawsuit."

Mr. Clueless, those two companies were "small time players" who folded fairly early on simply because they could not afford attorney's fees.

EW_writer:

Which means that while The Paper Store escaped out of a technicality, many other companies did not because...

"17 states--including Massachusetts--have made it illegal to sell research material knowing or having reason to believe that it will be submitted for academic credit."

Nonsense. The very REASON why essay sites are LEGAL is because of those laws! The laws afford legitimate, example research sites to sell their works for research purposes. Educate yourself, PLEASE.

EW_writer:

Ms. 86%?

Again, I am quite certain that EVERY legitimate member in this forum will tell you that you lost the argument—AGAIN. You know it, as well, which is why you have posted another thread to distract people.

May 31, 09, 10:09PM | #159

Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,171

WritersBeware:

I doubt that sincerely. I don't think anybody here believes your claim that 86% of students who buy papers from sites do not submit those papers or substantial parts of those papers as their own.

Day 773.