If I am a "liar," as you repeatedly claim, why do you keep ignoring my requests to quote just ONE "lie" that I have posted about your criminal buddies in the Philippines? I'll tell you why: because not a single lie exists!

Are you suggesting that all of the concrete evidence that I have provided is false? The online chat conversations that I posted are false? The bogus mailing address information is false? Am I "lying" about the the fact that they have purposely deceptive advertising? What, exactly, is the "lie"? Provide the quote, dog-eater.

I believe it is YOU who is done, dog-eater. You were done long ago, actually. Everyone here thinks you are a complete joke. Al you do is hurl accusations, while not providing the slightest proof. You're an insignificant parasite.

Writers Beware, will you let joey do this to you? I refuse to believe that you lied about your husband going to manila! Please tell us it isn't so.

I never "lied" about my husband going to Manilla. I never "lied" about anything. My husband is still going to Manilla, as scheduled. He will make the final decision as to whether he wants to sully his business trip just to cripple that piece of garbage. Lucky for Joey, the dog-eater, my husband isn't a vengeful person. I've seen my husband fight; I know what he can do to another human being. In the end, will my husband want to risk prosecution on foreign soil, simply for the pleasure of pummelling a worthless, criminal dog-eater? Well, probably not.

speaking just as a member of the peanut gallery, i don't think WB loses credibility if her husband does not show up to pummel joey to a bloody pulp. i'd be more inclined to think the opposite, that WB's credibility drops only if she elects to let her husband arrange to meet an arrogant *** in a foreign nation at a predetermined time and place, giving said *** the opportunity to show up with 20 of his closest friends in an attempt to make the fight fair. i think any reasonable person would think the same.

Like I said, give me the date and place. You can't and you instead hide behind all sorts of excuses because you know you're backed to a corner and have no way out.



Get real. He only needs to show up. That's proof enough that would humiliate me. He doesn't have to beat me up if he doesn't want to. In fact, you can just show me by giving me a date and place. If I did show up there and met him, that would clear you completely.



Oh thank you for giving me the excuse treat you in the same manner, *****. You know what? I think you and WB are pathetic **** buddies who can't get any fellas to ***. In most cases, that won't be so bad but considering how WB is described to look like, I just shudder at thought of what her partner's mug could be. OMG! Could it be?!? Are you coming to Manila in 2 weeks? Hahahaha!

Excuses. Would I be able to get 20 of my closest friends to come with and and beat the crap out of the hypothetical "husband" if we met in Manila Hotel? What about in Century Park? Like I said, I can get inside any place in the city no matter how posh so the beached whale's hypothetical husband doesn't need to worry about his neck.

The point of the matter is, IF WB wasn't lying, she'd be mad with joy at the opportunity to prove it, but she's not. She has come up with nothing but excuses ("oh my hubby doesn't want to soil his hands"... "oh my hubby doesn't wanna go to jail"... "oh my hubby is a yellow retard who can't fight"). The only way that this issue would go down without it decimating whatever credibility WB has is if she is able to produce her hypothetical husband.

oh no, the fat jokes are coming now! let me go grab a hankie.

Retard, I wasn't making any but here's a joke anyway (it's non-fat).

What do supposedly perfect grammar, poor comprehension skills, and an utter lack of credibility all add up to?











A beached whale who's so ugly, she's a disgrace to all beached whales that ever were and that ever will be. (ok.. so it's not so non-fat)

Everyone, do you know what I find amusing? It's the fact that Joey seems to have no idea that we all view him as the town idiot.

This buffoon's arguments in supporting AccessEssays.com's criminal activities are so unbelievably weak that he is now resorting to making my HUSBAND the focus of his twisted effort to somehow prove my "lack of credibility." Well, I suppose that's all a criminal can do when all else fails. What a complete dolt!

I have a question for you, self-proclaimed dog-eater:

Whether or not my husband decides to accept your challenge, how does that affect the credibility of the undeniable evidence that I have posted about your criminal buddies in the Philippines? Mind you, I have not posted "opinions" or "conjecture" about AccessEssays.com's crimes. I have posted concrete evidence that proves their fraudulent activities.

What you do not seem to understand, little man, is that "credibility" has no bearing whatsoever on FACTUAL information. If an admitted criminal, such as yourself, were to provide verifiable evidence on any given matter, I would be an absolute idiot to suggest that the verifiable evidence does not exist because a criminal presented it. If you were to show me a rabbit and say, "This is a rabbit," should I deny that it is a rabbit because you are a criminal?

A rock is a rock. A shoe is a shoe. A crime is a crime. Verifiable evidence is verifiable evidence. It makes no difference whether a saint or Satan calls attention to any of the aforementioned items--they are what they are. Understand, crook?

You can try with all of your painfully limited might to distract people from the FACTS about your fraudulent acts, but it will never work.

From this point forward, every time you come after me, personally, I will simply repost the FACTS and EVIDENCE against your criminal buddies at AccessEssays.com. So, in the words of good ol' Clint, "Go ahead--MAKE MY DAY."

you know what i find amusing?



i am still cracking up.

You know what's even funnier? I'm fat.

Not!

Right.. like we should believe you.

What's really funny is that the people going to this forum to air out their complaints do not need to suffer either of you anymore because you've proven yourselves to be complete jackasses.

i think it's incredibly stupid for a woman to arrange for her husband to go to a foreign country in order to meet a complete stranger for a pre-arranged physical altercation. joey's response: "you must be fat and stupid!" lol.

joey, we all got that message from your first post. any woman who disagrees with you is fat and stupid. way to continue to prove yourself a sexist moron.

Oh joy... :D

Lavinia, I don't think he called you fat and stupid (he did say you were a jackass). :)

Joey, I must hand it to you. Reading your work is so much fun! ^____^

What "work" is that, EW? Why don't you point out a single piece of EVIDENCE that he provided? Don't hold your breath while trying to find any.

hey EW, is jackass an ad hominem?

what about enabler?

hypocrite?

Say.. guess what today is. :D

You know who can not be trusted?

People who use logical fallacies as the basis of their argument. That would be you.

If you don't know what logical fallacies are or which one you are using, then you probably shouldn't be working in academia.

Oh, and anytime you come stateside, I'll be more than happy to show you how a mountain girl can put your sexist *** right to the floor. I don't need my husband to do that.

You are threatening people over the internet. You are an idiot and should be strung up and flogged in a public square.

Oh, and who gives a rats batootie if WB's husband went to Manila....even if he did, he probably doesn't want to get into a boxing match with this ignorant little twat, especially not if he is a mature adult.