WRT: You are, evidently, retarded. You have the termerity to claim that those in support of this proposal are "scammers"? How is that even possible? Those unwilling to support it are the questionable ones. The proposal is all about devising a strategy to ensure that companies do not lie to customers and do not cheat their writers; it is about ensuring honesty and constructively confronting the negative image the industry has acquired due to the practices of people like you.
And those who are proposing this move? who are they? are they honest? have they not cheated on their customers? don't they lie? the negative image that this industry has taken is because of this forum --- because of dirty tricks of ppl like you and WB who come here to malign their competitors and resultantly are also damaging the industry.. Why is to that only ET is endorsed as a genuine company on this forum? despite the fact that there many legitimate services offering good quality work to their customers.. show me an evidence where you have endorsed a service to whom you are not related in any sense? probably there will be few thread......
|
