| EW_writer |
|
Mar 8, 11, 07:40PM
| #81 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
Aww... that's the best you can do to keep from answering the simple question, huh? That's alright, keep on denying that you made a mistake. Maybe it will go away.
WritersBeware: Where have you selflessly helped someone?
By pointing out shills and giving clients advice on how to avoid scams? I do those often enough though not always in public.
But hey, I'd say that kicking your ass around in this forum is a public service all by itself.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 8, 11, 07:44PM
| #82 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: But hey, I'd say that kicking your ass around in this forum is a public service all by itself.
Typed like a true child . . . .
EW_writer: By pointing out shills and giving clients advice on how to avoid scams?
LMAO! The only reason why you do so is because YOU want the business. I venture to guess that your "non-public" messages incorporate offering your own writing services, which is why you don't make them public in the first place.
I suggest that you reference the definition of "selfless."
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Edited by: EW_writer Mar 8, 11, 08:31PM
| #83 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: LMAO! The only reason why you do so is because YOU want the business.
That's not true. It's also almost as fun as kicking your worthless a**.
EW_writer: Really, "literally ALL" of my posts? You've never agreed with me on ANY of my posts?
Still no answer.. tsk tsk...
EW_writer: we ALL know here that no matter how much you're proven wrong, conceding is something that retarded brain of yours is hardwired not to do. |
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 8, 11, 08:47PM
| #84 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
WritersBeware: LMAO! The only reason why you do so is because YOU want the business. I venture to guess that your "non-public" messages incorporate offering your own writing services, which is why you don't make them public in the first place. I suggest that you reference the definition of "selfless."
I can't help but notice that you intentionally ignored that . . . .
WritersBeware: EW_writer: Really, "literally ALL" of my posts? You've never agreed with me on ANY of my posts? Still no answer.. tsk tsk...
Answer for what? Can't you READ?WritersBeware: Where have you selflessly helped someone? |
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 8, 11, 10:00PM
| #85 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: I can't help but notice that you intentionally ignored that . . . .
I didn't. I answered with sarcasm. It's sad that you didn't get that.
WritersBeware: Answer for what? Can't you READ?
In what retarded world is this...
WritersBeware: Where have you selflessly helped someone?
...supposed to be an answer to these questions?
EW_writer: Really, "literally ALL" of my posts? You've never agreed with me on ANY of my posts?
You're as pathetic as you are hilarious.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 9, 11, 12:32AM
| #86 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
You know perfectly well what I mean, so stop trying to deflect. In order for your question to be at all legit, you have to first prove that you selflessly help people. I'm sorry that you are finding it so difficult to highlight any examples amongst your almost 2,000 posts.
STOP IGNORING:WritersBeware: You have already failed once to provide a valid example. Try again. You have almost 2,000 posts—it can't be that difficult to show an example or two, can it? |
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 9, 11, 03:20AM
| #87 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: In order for your question to be at all legit, you have to first prove that you selflessly help people.
Why is that? You do love making your own rules, don't you? :P Just makes you look that much sillier.
WBitch can't answer the question below with a simple yes or no...
EW_writer: Really, "literally ALL" of my posts? You've never agreed with me on ANY of my posts?
...and we all know why. ^______^
Say.. here's another question. Don't you ever get tired of losing? :p
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 9, 11, 03:51AM
| #88 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
Hey here, I'll make it simple for you. Do you disagree with this post that I made a few days ago?
EW_writer: Yes, it is. If you write crappy papers you're not supposed to get paid.
4writers is a BIG SCAM, writers beware!!!!!!!!
Best of luck trying to get out of the latest hole that you dug for yourself. ^_____^
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 9, 11, 12:30PM
| #89 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: Hey here, I'll make it simple for you. Do you disagree with this post that I made a few days ago? EW_writer: Yes, it is. If you write crappy papers you're not supposed to get paid. 4writers is a BIG SCAM, writers beware!!!!!!!! Best of luck trying to get out of the latest hole that you dug for yourself. ^_____^
Whether or not I "agree" with 1 out of 100 of your statements is irrelevant. Plus, what in the hell does that have to do with helping people? Nice try, idiot.
Oh, and if you want to play semantic games, you go right ahead. You have almost 2,000 posts. In how many of them have you selflessly helped to protect consumers?
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 9, 11, 04:16PM
| #90 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: Whether or not I "agree" with 1 out of 100 of your statements is irrelevant.
It is relevant when considering your argument that:
WritersBeware: Literally ALL of her posts involve attacking me or asking for people to help HER with her money issues. Pathetic . . . .
To which I responded with the following questions:
EW_writer: Really, "literally ALL" of my posts? You've never agreed with me on ANY of my posts?
WritersBeware: Oh, and if you want to play semantic games, you go right ahead. You have almost 2,000 posts. In how many of them have you selflessly helped to protect consumers?
WBoooooooring! Hahahaha!!! Even if I never helped anyone (and I'm NOT saying that I never did), it is completely irrelevant to the questions I posed above.
EW_writer: Yes, it is. If you write crappy papers you're not supposed to get paid.
So you don't agree with me on the above post? Hmmmm.... figures. ^_____^
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Mar 9, 11, 04:39PM
| #91 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
it's time that someone used this board for something useful.
|
|
| pheelyks |
Writer |
Mar 9, 11, 04:44PM
| #92 |
Joined: Jan 20, 09
Threads: 8
Posts: 3,796
|
editor75: it's time that someone used this board for something useful.
Like, using real information to come to rational conclusions?
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Edited by: editor75 Mar 9, 11, 06:48PM
| #93 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
sure. let's start with some real information. for someone who ******* so much about people not reading threads, did you read this one?
I don't see any real information anywhere here. anyone have some?
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Mar 9, 11, 06:51PM
| #94 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
if you need a prompt, my first question is: who wrote the DND list?
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 9, 11, 06:55PM
| #95 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: So you don't agree with me on the above post? Hmmmm.... figures. ^_____^
Oh, my bad—I stand corrected. I have severely misjudged EW_writer. She has apparently contributed 1 post in which she does not either attack me with personal propaganda or seek selfish advice about her personal money issues. Let's all give EW_writer a huge round of applause for "winning" (just like Charlie Sheen).
LMAO!
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 9, 11, 06:58PM
| #96 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
editor75: if you need a prompt, my first question is: who wrote the DND list?
Nobody wrote it, you f*cking clueless buffoon. Site owners submit their own URLs. So much for your obvious, shady attempt to attack the character of the moderators of this forum.
If you are a business owner and wish your websites to be AUTOMATICALLY included on the Do Not Discuss (DND) list you may add your domain here.
|
|
| editor75 |
|
Mar 9, 11, 07:48PM
| #97 |
Joined: Dec 18, 10
Threads: 6
Posts: 999
|
WB, has it ever struck you that the same mods whose asses you're kissing put half of your posts in the garbage?
so, let me get this straight... companies submit their company names to an anonymous internet message board's unnamed and unknown moderator. and, the purpose of the forum is to get information on the names of fraudulent companies. no wonder everyone's so frustrated.
|
|
| Eat A Dick |
|
Mar 9, 11, 07:48PM
| #98 |
Joined: Mar 9, 11
Posts: 3
|
WritersBeware: "winning" (just like Charlie Sheen).
*uck yeah!
I love Charlie Sheen.... I love his *itches too.
Coke is bad ace!
EAD
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 9, 11, 10:16PM
| #99 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: I have severely misjudged EW_writer. She has apparently contributed 1 post in which she does not either attack me with personal propaganda or seek selfish advice about her personal money issues.
Sigh... you just keep coming back for more.
EW_writer: Interesting how you had to post that on the thread. It almost seems like well... perhaps we all know what it almost seems like. ^___^ My two cents on Amon? He will not write you "model" dissertations, just "model" essays on "How to be anything you want to be." Plus, he will refuse your order if his spider-sense tells him that you have ordered too many papers for your own good already (not that you'd want to order one from him to begin with but hey... maybe that's precisely what he wants you to think) I think he's been trying to establish his presence in this forum as a ploy to draw potential clients' attention. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that the way he does it is so darn tacky. :)
Amons Essays
EW_writer: So what's your point in this barely understandable jumble of words? Are you trying to justify your fraudulent actions (selling accounts) by claiming that the actions of companies, writers, and students are also ethically questionable? You can justify your actions all you want. What's clear based on what is happening at the moment is that your kind (account-selling, incompetent riffraff) will soon be gone from this industry.
Uvocorp account Up for sale
EW_writer: Preposterous! Nurture beats nature any day. LOL!!! Seriously though, your English sucks. Do you disagree?
Kenyan Writers
So which of these other posts do you disagree with? ^______^
|
|
| somewriter |
|
Mar 10, 11, 12:51AM
| #100 |
Joined: Jun 4, 10
Threads: 14
Posts: 149
|
WritersBeware: LMAO! That's my "terrible" and "rude" first response to Somewriter? Again, LMAO! You're both so very weak and desperate.
It's at least as rude as my question about you that you referred to when saying I attacked you. Mine was no worse than yours, especially considering that yours came first and was unprovoked. You seem to think that typing "LMAO" makes your lies come true.
pheelyks: Somewriter: Your original statement was that the posts had been deleted. If what you actually meant at that time was that the digital information creating the posts had been deleted while new digital information making new posts that exactly duplicated those original posts was created, you should have said so.
Actually, as has been made clear in at least one previous post, this is not a matter of the digital information being deleted. I have never said that, and made clear that I do not know whether the digital information would have been copied, i.e. whether having two tokens of the same type would involve them both being based in the same digital information or whether it would involve each being based in separate information (in which case the two instances of the information could also said to be two tokens of the same type). Even if it is just one instance of digitally stored information, it seems this piece of information could be the ground for two qualitatively identical posts. So once again, you haven't understood what I've been saying and have overlooked statements that clearly contradict your assessment of my argument. Whether the piece of stored information was one or two, the duplicate posts are two, not one. Surely even you can understand that distinction.
pheelyks: No rational person would have read your original comment and assumed you were making ontological and metaphysical arguments about the nature of digital information. I didn't "shift focus," it just took you awhile to reveal yourself as a douchebag who likes to argue about things of no practical value whatsoever. Go **** yourself.
First, you have no business making assumptions about rational people. Second, making my "original comment" was not "making ontological and metaphysical arguments" and I never said so. Making an assertion is quite different from making an argument. You said the statement was false, so I argued that it was true. As with any other statement, arguing that it is true involves establishing truth conditions as well as showing that those conditions obtained in the situation in question. That is exactly what I was doing. That a statement's being true implies certain things about the world is just what it is for a statement to say something about the world.
You obviously have no response to my last post or the majority of my post before that. The best you can do is try to misconstrue what I've been doing and point out flaws in the misconstrued version. As with your continued whining that it's just semantics, I'm not surprised to see you committing the straw man fallacy over and over, as that is another common strategy of the pseudointellectual.
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 10, 11, 02:33AM
| #101 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: So which of these other posts do you disagree with? ^______^
You simply echoed positions that I made clear ages ago. Plus, you proved yourself a hypocrite at the same time, as you previously got on my case numerous times for mentioning geographical origin and/or "race," as well as highlighting particular members' lack of writing skills.
Next.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Edited by: EW_writer Mar 10, 11, 02:41AM
| #102 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: You simply echoed positions that I made clear ages ago.
Wow.. more WBullshit. Why am I not surprised?
WritersBeware: as you previously got on my case numerous times for mentioning geographical origin and/or "race,"
In which of my posts did I berate anyone because of their geographical location/race? Please don't try to make it seem that my posts and positions are similar to yours. It's creepy.
So... do you still want to deny that you were WRONG about the statement below?
WritersBeware: Literally ALL of her posts involve attacking me or asking for people to help HER with her money issues. |
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Edited by: WritersBeware Mar 10, 11, 02:54AM
| #103 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: In which of my posts did I berate anyone because of their geographical location/race? Please don't try to make it seem that my posts and positions are similar to yours.
Ah, so you are claiming that I have done so, without any direct connection to proving the person's fraudulent nature? Go for it . . . .
EW_writer: So... do you still want to deny that you were WRONG about the statement below? WritersBeware: Oh, my bad—I stand corrected. I have severely misjudged EW_writer. She has apparently contributed 1 post in which she does not either attack me with personal propaganda or seek selfish advice about her personal money issues. Let's all give EW_writer a huge round of applause for "winning" (just like Charlie Sheen). LMAO!
Are you deaf, dumb, AND blind?
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 10, 11, 03:13AM
| #104 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: Ah, so you are claiming that I have done so,
I claimed nothing.. you did:
WritersBeware: Plus, you proved yourself a hypocrite at the same time, as you previously got on my case numerous times for mentioning geographical origin and/or "race,"
WBoooooooring. ^____^
WritersBeware: Are you deaf, dumb, AND blind?
Oh, so that's what you admitting that you were wrong looks like. LOL!!! I just wanted to make it clear that I have made not 1, but a whole bunch of posts in this forum that have nothing to do with you, and I have made many that you cannot disagree with.
|
|
| Eat A Dick |
|
Mar 10, 11, 10:42AM
| #105 |
Joined: Mar 9, 11
Posts: 3
|
WritersBeware: Are you deaf, dumb, AND blind?
no, they just can't talk....LMAO!
Like the balls on your chest...LMAO!
EAD
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Mar 10, 11, 01:54PM
| #106 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: a whole bunch of posts in this forum that have nothing to do with you
Yeah, as I clearly stated, they have to do with your personal money issues.
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 10, 11, 02:37PM
| #107 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: they have to do with your personal money issues.
sigh.. so which among these posts have to do with my personal money issues?
EW_writer: I think he's been trying to establish his presence in this forum as a ploy to draw potential clients' attention. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that the way he does it is so darn tacky. :)
EW_writer: So what's your point in this barely understandable jumble of words? Are you trying to justify your fraudulent actions (selling accounts) by claiming that the actions of companies, writers, and students are also ethically questionable? You can justify your actions all you want. What's clear based on what is happening at the moment is that your kind (account-selling, incompetent riffraff) will soon be gone from this industry.
EW_writer: Preposterous! Nurture beats nature any day. LOL!!! Seriously though, your English sucks. Do you disagree?
You just keep coming back for more, WBitch. ^____^
|
|
| WritersBeware |
|
Mar 10, 11, 02:46PM
| #108 |
Joined: Apr 19, 07
Threads: 152
Posts: 8,669
|
EW_writer: sigh.. so which among these posts have to do with my personal money issues?
Three posts? Is that your idea of "valid sample size" from a total population of nearly 2,000? LMAO!
H
Y
P
O
C
R
I
T
E
|
|
| EW_writer |
|
Mar 10, 11, 02:57PM
| #109 |
Joined: Jul 2, 07
Threads: 27
Posts: 2,239
|
WritersBeware: Three posts? Is that your idea of "valid sample size" from a total population of nearly 2,000? LMAO!
Sigh... now you're being desperate. Remember, the argument that you were defending was:
EW_writer: Literally ALL of her posts involve attacking me or asking for people to help HER with her money issues.
There are two things that are going against you here. The word "ALL," and the stupidity of actually placing "Literally" before it. ^___________^
Oh, but it's so cute how you try to bring up statistical principles into a discussion.. like an infant trying to say her first word. ^______^ "Stataaa... stataa..."
Hahaha!!!!
|
|
