Libel - a false, published statement, whose intent is malicious

Dummies, you know who you are. Given your horrifyingly low IQ levels (sad but true), I will try to make this as simple as possible:

What does libel mean? Libel is a false, published statement, whose intent is malicious. It must be directed at a living person and/or entity. Now, there are a couple of problems with your "Libellers and Liars" mantra:
a) You are neither persons nor business entities but abnormal creatures which crypozoologists find fascinating;
b) A forum user name cannot libel another forum username. Usernames cannot scream `libel.'

Let me give you an example: Researcher, otherwise known as the Imbecile, cannot run off to its lawyer and say "WRT `libelled' me, Researcher, on essayscam." For it to be libel, it has to be false, malicious and directed towards an ACTUAL living person or entity. Researcher is a handle and not an actual person (yes, it is a creature but besides that – the legal name by which that creature goes, has not been mentioned).

The dummy dumb dumbs may counter the above by arguing that we libel business entities – competitors. Again, this is not true:
For the statement to be considered libel, it has to be both malicious and false:
a) Stating that essaywriters is dishonest is not libel. It lies about its writers' qualifications, about its nationality and its quality of service.
b) Stating that essaybrunch.com is a horrifyingly rotten choice of a name for an academic research website is not libel – it is a well-reasoned opinion.
c) Stating that masteressay.com is a low quality website which is Pakistani, not British, is not libel. You see, the statement is not false.
d) Stating that priorityessays, classaessays, academicawriters, etc "borrowed" their webcopy from masterpapers, academia-research and Academic Answers, is not libel. Until the end of November, this statement was true and the evidence is widely available. Hence, it is not libel.

Now that we have explained (in Simple Simon terms) what libel is not, let's see what it is:
It is naming a specific company and insisting that it is a scam and cheap-quality website and not providing any supporting evidence. Making the statement, in itself, is not libel but doing in spite of the complete lack of evidence, is. When made with malicious intent, it is libel and when made by a competitor for the purpose of harming economic interest, it is damn serious.

What can the named and targeted company do? It can obtain a court order, demanding the revelation of the poster's IP and proceed to take that person to the cleaners. Let us assume that a proxy IP is used. Simple ... when an IP is detected as a proxy, the proxy provider is forced to cooperate, as are the email providers (when any sign on to a forum, they provide an email address). Significantly, people connect to proxies through their ISP and, interestingly enough, cheap proxy connections drop all the time without the user even really knowing. The point is – electronic traces exist and it is not at all difficult to identify the poster. Costly, yes but, difficult, not really ...

Some assume that because they are not located in the United States or the UK (UK court rulings are enforceable throughout much of the Commonwealth), they are safe. Not very true. Yes, you may escape having to pay damages, etc but, your websites will be taken down, your domains will be cancelled, search engines will comply with a ban against you and your hosting provider will cancel your hosting account. In other words, as a business, your online presence will be annihilated, completely obliterated ...

Conclusion: when you criticise a website, make sure that you are not promoting false and malicious statements.

WRT - Amen! :)

What a great piece of research...........

Let me give you an example here MF... You are a piece of cun* who has been born as Eunuch and lacks the ability to even defend himself... idiot.... libel me and i will fuc* ur As* in the court of law.... do you dare that? idiot.... Aussie.......

Idiot.... this is what you have been doing... but you failed to harm the economic interests of your competitors. once you do that you will know all the legal terms in greater details when your lawyer will get your as* out of a remote jail in Australia because till than your competitors would have gotten you to the tooth....

Did you see the dummy's well-thought out response? Sad ...

That would be a challenge as I've never been to Australia :)
Would you consider this libel: Researcher is an Imbecile. If you do, you would be wrong. It is an opinion which any well-reasoned person would agree with. If you want to take this farther than that, no problem. Give me your real name and post proof that it is your real name - as in an ID - and I will call you an Imbecile :) Ball is in your court ...

idiot..... this is what I asked you for..... post your address here and I will let you know how law works in UK.. idiot.. com'on dare it.. post your address....... show the world who you are.......

Imbecile - aren't you the one who wants to sue me for libel? OK, post proof of your ID and I will call you an imbecile using your real name. Even an imbecile such as yourself can understand that ...

Spamming scammer - stop recommending your low-quality sites.

Loser.

Actually, its hilarious! ;)

On second thought - you are right :) Be happy!

Must be a full moon! The little doggies are barking MAD again! Who let the dogs out? WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF! Should be put down really...

Leson for the RETARDS:

LIE = an untruth

Such as accusing posters of being those they are not WITHOUT EVIDENCE and worse, accusing innocent people as being alleged scammers! That is also defamation and a hate campaign of cyber bullying.

Accusing legitimate and trustworthy websites of being scams. That IS libel actually.


DISHONESTY = criticising, abusing, maligning, disparaging other website essay websites but NOT revealing that you are doing that because those websites are your own websites competition! It is ONLY because of posters like me that we now know that:

WB and Phleeksie = EssayTown

WRT the lapdog = an Australian essay site owner and spammer scambag!


But I agree - IT IS HILARIOUS! And BOY is WRT annoyed! HA HA HA! Such fun winding up the DINGO!

Go lick mummy's hole now, rover. Din dins!

SOOOOOO FUNNNNNYYYYYY!!!!!

Glad that you've finally faced up to what you really are :) Congrats, kiddo!

Not at all :) I find you rather interesting. Never came across a psycho before.

Cyberbullying ... eh? You have really given yourself away! We really know who you are now - absobloodylutely not a shred of doubt :)

That was so frigging stupid of you :):)

While I am not sure how you define things Down Under, I highly doubt Australia is an exception to the norm.

You've made the `cyberbullying' accusation on several occasions. Do you even know what cyberbulling is? Apparently not. Being such a kind soul, I will explain it. Pay attention and you may learn something:
Cyberbullying is the deliberate and repeated engagement in hostile behaviour, as expressed through hurtful language and malicious, false clams. Often involving cyberstalking, cyberbullies target a single individual, a business entity or group of people. Its intent is to harm the target of the attacks. Harm ranges from the psychological to the economical.

Should you accuse any here of cyberbullying, you have to establish that
1) The attacks targeted you, as in your real world identity;
2) The attacks were completely unprovoked;
3) The attacks involved the propagation of false and malicious rumours and statements;
4) The attacks continued despite your having removed yourself from the forum within which they occurred
5) The alleged cyberbullies stalked and harassed you

Now, calling you a `Melissa' or refusing to believe that you are British, are not acts of cyberbullying because
1) If you are, Melissa from Australia, the claims are factual and, therefore, neither malicious nor false
2) If you are not Melissa from Australia, that means we do not know who you really are and, therefore, have not attacked you (as in your real world, legal, identity) at all. Cyberbullying is not even an issue.
3) You were the instigator of the attacks (look back to the May 2009 posts)
4) You stalked at least two forum members
5) You never made an attempt to leave the forum but, instead, whenever one of your usernames was banned, you came back with another
6) Any and all criticisms were made on the basis of verifiable and undeniable evidence: violation of copyright laws, engagement in the torte of passing off, among others. Calling you, or anyone else, out on those is not cyberbullying at all. Why? Simply because incontrovertible evidence supports the accusations as truthful.

You, on the other hand, are involved in both cyberbullying and cyberstalking.

FYI – in a formal legal setting, people are judged by real, not imaginary, laws. No judge will allow you to define cyberbullying or libel as suits you. This is the real world and in the real world you can be charged with
1) Cyberbulling
2) Cyberstalking
3) Defamation
4) Libel
5) `passing off'
6) Racism
7) Publicly supporting terrorism on numerous occasions

In both the UK and the US, all these are terribly serious. We are talking about real world laws, laws as they actually are, and not about laws as you imagine them to be.

Now THAT is a reasoned response!

Moronic coward, you refuse to IDENTIFY those sites. A nonexistent entity cannot be libeled. A nonexistent entity cannot sue for libel.

You won't name the sites because you know that I will easily be able to PROVE truthful any and all original accusations.

You're supposed to use moron spelling: `libelled'! Why must you spell correctly?!

Psycho, WB is openly rejecting your redefinition of the English language, your liberal and highly imaginative interpretation of law and your rewriting of history. That, in my opinion, is LIBEL!

By the way, lying about any of the following justifies the labelling of a website as fraudulent and untrustworthy:
1) date of incorporation
2) geographic origin
3) quality of service

All of the above are illegal. Hence, should a website claim that it is 10 years old, is British/American or only hires MA/PhD writers from the USA and the UK when it is or does not, it is in violation of the law. Hence, a Pakistani website cannot lie about its geographic origin (hear that, Researcher?) and shout `libel' if any call it fraudulent. The truth is not libel.

Believe it or not, while the United States may not have jurisdiction over a non-resident alien person or entity, an American court ruling has the power to wipe the website/domain in question off the face of the internet.

This is not about non UK and non US websites versus UK and US websites; it is about being honest.

Conclusion: while not disclosing your geographic origin may be unethical, it is not illegal; lying about your geographic origin, however, is illegal. Furthermore, while hiring inept, illiterate morons as writers (irrespective of their nationality) may not be illegal, misrepresenting their qualifications is.

Learn the meaning of libel, morons, before you go around accusing all and sundry of it.

Right.

Researcher—a speck of dust in comparison to $180,000,000-per-year Axact—should probably review the Axact (Pakistan) vs. SNR (US) decision through which Axact LOST all 555 of its essay sites. Guess to where all 555 of those sites now redirect. That's right—they all redirect to ET.

CONCLUSION: It's probably not a good idea to libel and defame a company that already has the knowledge, technical skills, previously successful attorneys, and legal precedent to utterly erase from the Internet all of your existing and future (via permanent injunction) sites.

Moron.. your own site is a ripoff... idiot.. go prove that you are a Russian and EssayTown is a Russian site cheating and scamming its customers since years....... confess that you own and operate this forum otherwise your as* will be rammed in court of law.......

Your desperation is humorous.

Really... Years of relentless rambling and crap on this forum indicates that you are the most desperate creature in this industry because she knows her site cannot attract customers and only way to spam the sit is to libel and defame others.. idiot... you are exposed......

1. LMAO!

2. I do not have a site.

3. I will assume that by "site," you are—as always—referring to and libeling ET. For your information, public records indicate that ET is the most popular, highly-trafficked, successful, strictly commercial site in the entire essay industry. Therefore, your "can't compete" assertion is inherently asinine.

Truth about Essaytown.com visitors
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/essaytown.com

Wow, Imbecile, did you see Essaytown's ranking????? Hardly any can boast such a global ranking! By the way, Imbecile, I understand that you directed us to Alexa in order to see the Indian visitation figures and then build an argument about their writers being Indian. No go. You see, this is the client-end website, not the writer/admin one :

Now, let's see how your site, essaybrunch.com, compares to Essaytown (essaytown is the blue and essaybrunch is the red):

Essaytown vs Essaybrunch

Spellchecker + Researcher = EVERYONE IGNORE

You are such an idiot.... do you think Indians order dissertations from such crappy sites? moron India still is a poor country and no student can afford to offer you $18 per page... you are such an idiot... moron.. the fact is most of its writers as well as its owners are located outside US..... idiot.. accept this fact..

because they expose your fraud on this forum.....

QuelleSurprise, AKA StudentAdvice -
do you need a refresher?

All your names to date (although a few might have slipped by)
Spellchecker
QuelleSurprise
WritersRoom
Asif4444
BullBuster
Cindy Lawrence
Jennifer199
justin coutts
katie71989
LieBuster
OxbridgeExpert
Kevin
Modmuff
Spartacus
SpellChecker
Spotthedonkey
truthprevails

Little girlie boy is crying now :)

PM alliances are very NAUGHTY!