I compiled a corpus of about 300 RANDOM WB's threads/posts from the archives.
Less than 5%. Interesting sample size.
I then subjected her opinions to thorough CONTENT ANALYSIS
Which of course you'll have no problem posting here in their raw form.
scientifically acceptable deductions.
...and no doubt you'll be providing citations regarding the scientific acceptability of these deductions.
I rarely make such sweeping conclusions without the backing of CREDIBLE data that is interpreted via acceptable scientific methodologies.
I rarely trust such information unless someone backs it up with, you know, actually providing the information. It sounds lke you've done a lot of research here; I wonder why you wouldn't post the results....